Harvey 🇺🇸

5.5K posts

Harvey 🇺🇸 banner
Harvey 🇺🇸

Harvey 🇺🇸

@realharveymark

I trade options and express opinions.

Katılım Nisan 2019
594 Takip Edilen2.4K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Harvey 🇺🇸
Harvey 🇺🇸@realharveymark·
You get to choose your sacrifice; you don’t get to not make one.
English
1
6
50
0
Harvey 🇺🇸
Harvey 🇺🇸@realharveymark·
@CrowdWisdomAlgo You’ve got it. The vol expands with the breach of the short calls sold for yield getting run over requiring cover and roll higher. This becomes a chase as other participants rush in. Modern market mechanics
English
0
0
1
28
Crowd Wisdom Trading
Crowd Wisdom Trading@CrowdWisdomAlgo·
@realharveymark This dynamic explains why dips feel shallow. Retail yield trades dampen pullbacks, forcing vol higher on strength. The unwind tends to be fast once flow reverses, so trend strength matters more than fading.
English
1
0
0
17
Harvey 🇺🇸
Harvey 🇺🇸@realharveymark·
Vol sellers would normally dampen moves as dealers get long gamma but we had earnings and AI Semi enthusiasm with substantive economic development implications. Retail piled in, the overwriters got run over forcing cover and roll. Right tail chase then taking implied volatility higher with the underlying. The kicker comes late each session when leveraged ETFs rebalance. These flows work like short gamma amplifying the directional movement in spot, which frequently means some short calls have to roll higher. When the short call stops rolling higher the potential to cascade lower will be activated. A chunk of hedging demand (buying in this case) goes away then some profit taking removes some more. The flows reverse as participants see cheap downside, gaps and little structural support. Not likely the chaos that people perseverating about bubbles and dotcom are nostalgic for but still 7 handle imo
English
0
0
6
264
Harvey 🇺🇸
Harvey 🇺🇸@realharveymark·
Hedging demand would look like heavy put buying (elevated left-tail protection, high put skew). That’s not what’s happening here. Put skew is historically low. The flows are overwhelmingly right-tail chasing and short-call covering. Once the crash up began into Q2 inflows and then earnings, we saw rapid unwind of hedges and shorts but 1mo realized volatility was elevated (and > ivol) so vol targeting funds, funds that sell vol for yield were sidelined. April 27 began the 1mo rvol smush that brought rvol back below ivol and target vol making vol selling more attractive. When retail buys the dip they choose leveraged ETFs which sell vol for yield. And this is how we get spot up, vol up, melt up.
English
2
0
2
287
Harvey 🇺🇸
Harvey 🇺🇸@realharveymark·
Buy the bubble | Buy the dip
Harvey 🇺🇸 tweet mediaHarvey 🇺🇸 tweet media
English
0
0
2
496
Harvey 🇺🇸 retweetledi
Citrini
Citrini@citrini·
People keep confusing a bubble with “stocks go up and get overvalued”. A bubble is when when a prevailing trend and a prevailing misconception about that trend interact reflexively, each reinforcing the other until the gap between perception and reality becomes unsustainable. A bubble is not when everyone realizes that right now every iota of AI demand eventually, at some point upstream, must move through memory OEMs. Nor is it when estimates continue rising because things are better than expected. And it’s not just when stocks trade expensive to historical valuations. The reason behind the moves in the AI infrastructure layer so far have been simply that we don’t have enough. They’ve been driven by the fundamental reality more than the perception of the future. It’s why the bulk of the most bullish parts of this cycle have been lumpy and centered around earnings season when companies uniformly come out and confirm there’s still not enough. In the bubble, the reality is driven by the market - not the other way around. Everyone keeps saying “people are gonna freak out if it’s not a bubble!”. I think that’s silly, we have a transformative new technology that needs crazy capital to fuel it coming to fruition, that has and always will result in a bubble as long as we have financial markets. But if you want to call the top in a bubble, you need a much stronger view on what the misconception is and what negative catalyst forces broad perception to align with realizing it than you do on valuation.
English
218
368
3.5K
712.1K
Harvey 🇺🇸
Harvey 🇺🇸@realharveymark·
Buybacks, CTAs, Vol Control, crushed 1mo rvol, long gamma grind … 7400. It’s not crazy; it’s modern market mechanics
English
0
0
4
117
Harvey 🇺🇸
Harvey 🇺🇸@realharveymark·
“But not yet” Pretty straightforward scenario with opex flows where following expiration we have a probable window of expansion (range, vol). That puts next week on watch for some reversion. But over next several weeks though they are a risk window there’s systematic inflows like buybacks, CTAs, and as dealers accumulate long gamma we anticipate falling realized volatility lining up resumption of vol control bid. That’s a gamma grind, likely range bound until VIX calls are more attractive than index puts - theta hotel
Harvey 🇺🇸@realharveymark

Go slow with an eye on opportunity. We will get a downside test into May. But not yet.

English
2
0
7
771
Harvey 🇺🇸
Harvey 🇺🇸@realharveymark·
Some of you might be more familiar with the shorter version: Boomers like Leveraged ETFs and Target Vol funds that sell volatility (short calls -> dealer long gamma) for yield. Guess what they bought with their tax refund?
Ben Kizemchuk@BenKizemchuk

Using 0DTE calls to manufacture exit liquidity: The current tape increasingly reflects a liquidity-constrained, derivatives-driven regime in which large institutional players may be able to influence the marginal liquidity environment itself. While the typical framework of 0DTE call buying forces dealers into short gamma hedging, the present setup characterized by suppressed volumes, structurally long aggregate dealer gamma, and weak breadth, suggests a more opportunistic strategy is at play. In particular, the role of 0DTE options may be less about outright directional exposure and more about engineering transient liquidity that facilitates discreet inventory reduction. In a tape where trading volume has remained persistently depressed for weeks (eg SPY volume running ~40-50% below its 60-day average), relatively modest notional flows can have an outsized effect on index pricing via ES futures. Under these conditions, even within a broadly long-gamma regime, localized pushes can occur into key strikes, especially when large flows concentrate near-the-money. When these pockets emerge, dealer hedging can become temporarily procyclical, generating short bursts of mechanical upside. This creates an exploitable structure for large funds. Rather than signaling a defensive intent through overt put buying or index selling, a fund can deploy concentrated 0DTE call flow to induce or amplify these short-lived hedging flows, effectively lifting the index at the margin. Crucially, because the impact is expressed primarily through index futures rather than broad cash equity demand, it creates a divergence between index performance and underlying participation. This allows the fund to systematically exit or reduce individual equity exposures into strength, using the derivatives-induced bid effectively as camouflage. The key insight is that the options market, in a thin regime, has become a tool for shaping execution, instead of portfolio insurance. By initiating temporary demand via dealer hedging, funds can manufacture exit liquidity that does not originate from natural buyers of the underlying equities. This helps explain the current market bifurcation: rapid index appreciation toward all-time highs alongside deteriorating breadth, with a significant share of stocks failing to confirm the move. The index is likely being supported by flow-induced futures demand, while underneath, distribution persists largely unchecked. The broader implication is that the market has been increasingly defined by a reflexive loop between derivatives flows and liquidity conditions, where price action has diverged significantly from underlying fundamentals or breadth. While this allows for controlled index levitation in the near term, it also introduces fragility. This is not a stable or continuously scalable strategy. If positioning shifts and dealer gamma flips more persistently negative in a still-thin tape, the same mechanics that currently support the market could rapidly reverse. Notably, there are early signs that the regime may already be evolving, as evidenced by the recent emergence of a spot-up / vol-up dynamic, alongside a tentative rise in implied correlation from depressed levels. At sufficient scale, particularly in 0DTE tenors, continuous call demand can begin to lift implied volatility mechanically, as dealers are forced to reprice optionality higher to accommodate one-sided flow. The shift to a spot-up / vol-up regime suggests that incremental upside is no longer benign, but rather must contend with an increasing demand for convexity. Rising convexity demand itself can become self-fulfilling. Concurrently, the rise in implied correlation indicates that dispersion is compressing. This has typically been a precursor to more directional and less stable index behavior.

English
0
0
5
676
MQ
MQ@MachinaQuanta·
@realharveymark Still seeing too much doom and gloom out there? :)
English
1
0
0
50
Harvey 🇺🇸
Harvey 🇺🇸@realharveymark·
Now that you one-shot your own Bloomberg Terminal powered by Yahoo Finance can I interest you in sub-quadratic sparse-attention architecture
English
1
0
1
315
Harvey 🇺🇸
Harvey 🇺🇸@realharveymark·
You’re looking for Charlie to push out a note but you already know what it will say. You get the sharpe table showing how sold calls were cheeks and now sold puts are wowo and this of course because the AUM in leveraged ETFs is back to growing. Soon we stop for VIX call spreads before we pull up to hotel theta
Harvey 🇺🇸@realharveymark

Dealers have accumulated long gamma. Realized vol smushed, vol control bid easing in. Not long now before Hotel Theta

English
0
0
4
918