Candy

99 posts

Candy

Candy

@realrawcandy

Sleek af | send me memes :)

Katılım Ocak 2025
75 Takip Edilen15 Takipçiler
Candy
Candy@realrawcandy·
last thing i need is negativity.
English
0
0
1
7
Candy
Candy@realrawcandy·
kya be madarchod BOS of ICAI, aukat hai to khud do AFM ka paper. gandu sale chatgpt se chipka rahe hai sab.
हिन्दी
0
0
4
1.1K
Paras Chopra
Paras Chopra@paraschopra·
Been wondering lately that given everyone has a consultant with all the world’s knowledge in their pockets, we should be seeing efficiency rise across the board everywhere. Literally everyone can now get personalised advise on how to serve their customers better, improve quality of their outputs, cut inefficiencies and increase revenue. .. yet, this is nowhere to be seen (especially for small local businesses). Why aren’t we seeing the rate of change accelerate in the world? One possible explanation is inertia, and there’s some truth to that. But perhaps a better explanation is that perhaps advice was never a bottleneck. Maybe implementation was? Or perhaps most businesses are already in their local optima and any change is too risky for them to bear? This, of course, is theory of constraints and it explains a lot: when outputs are a result of many factors, when one factor is made efficient, what holds back output is the slowest changing factor.
English
68
25
444
29.5K
Candy
Candy@realrawcandy·
Good Explanations Are “Hard to Vary” Here’s a simple way to understand a powerful idea from David Deutsch’s book The Beginning of Infinity. A good explanation is hard to vary. That means changing any part of it makes the whole thing stop making sense. A bad explanation is easy to vary. You can change words or details and it still sounds okay—but it doesn’t really explain much. Example with Pop-Tarts Weak explanation (easy to vary): “Pop-Tarts are called that because the name sounds catchy.” You can easily change it to “…because the name sounds fun” or “…because the name sounds cool.” It still feels like it works. This explanation is loose and not very useful. Strong explanation (hard to vary): “Pop-Tarts are called that because they pop out of the toaster when they’re ready and they taste sweet and tart.” • “Pop” matches the toaster action. • “Tart” matches the fruity, tangy taste. If you change even one part—“They jump out of the toaster and taste sweet and spicy”—the explanation breaks. It no longer fits the facts. That tight connection is what makes it strong. Why This Matters This idea helps us in science, daily life, and problem-solving: • Good explanations (hard to vary) give us real understanding. Example: Seasons happen because Earth is tilted and orbits the sun. You can’t easily change that without breaking what we know about planets and sunlight. • Bad explanations (easy to vary) let us fool ourselves. They sound okay but don’t hold up when tested. Next time someone explains something, ask: “Can I change parts of this explanation without breaking it?” If yes, it’s probably weak. Look for explanations that are hard to vary. They bring real knowledge and help us solve problems better. This simple test can make you a clearer thinker in everyday life.
English
0
0
0
31
Candy
Candy@realrawcandy·
@kut77less @fortelabs true, roam/hogseq shine for pure block-level flow. obsidian is folder-optional tho — links, tags & graph let you go fully network-style without folders if you want. Different tools for different minds!
English
0
0
1
157
SOK
SOK@kut77less·
@realrawcandy @fortelabs ? Obsidian is all folder based . Roam research or logseq is where it’s truly not folder based - I do agree with your assessment I just think the way roam works is so much better for fluid connections and thinking
English
1
0
2
200
Tiago Forte
Tiago Forte@fortelabs·
Is it true that Obsidian only has around 1.5 million users!? Compared to 225 million for Evernote at its peak? So Obsidian has only reached 0.7% the size of the Evernote user base. It's a niche of a niche of a niche.
Tiago Forte tweet mediaTiago Forte tweet media
English
103
7
376
77.4K
Gabbar
Gabbar@GabbbarSingh·
Riyaan Parag Hardik Pandya Ruturaj Gaikwad Suryakumar Yadav What’s the common thing?
हिन्दी
240
41
2.1K
209.5K
Candy
Candy@realrawcandy·
@nikitabier X is the sweet spot. capitalist enough to get paid, but not LinkedIn enough to get raw-dogged by Jürgen from SAP while he circle-jerks about synergies. perfect.
English
0
0
0
235
Nikita Bier
Nikita Bier@nikitabier·
X is sufficiently capitalist where it is valuable to post & build a reputation here (unlike reddit or 4chan), but not so capitalist that it drains your soul like Linkedin. It’s perfect.
English
2.8K
808
14.6K
835K
Candy
Candy@realrawcandy·
@cb_doge oh the entire left wing 🤣
English
0
0
1
12
DogeDesigner
DogeDesigner@cb_doge·
Tell me a bigger liar than Sam Altman. I’ll wait.
English
2K
295
3.1K
265.3K
aditya
aditya@adxtyahq·
chatgpt 5.4 just casually solved a 60+ year unsolved Erdős problem pure phd-level math reasoning, one shot in 80m17s
aditya tweet media
English
64
74
1.9K
220.5K
Candy
Candy@realrawcandy·
@briankeating @neiltyson but exponential AI + reusable rockets just turn the 2020s into the decade that makes every prior one look cute.
English
0
0
0
83
Prof. Brian Keating
Prof. Brian Keating@Briankeating·
Neil deGrasse Tyson (@neiltyson) told me Peter Thiel is wrong about scientific stagnation. 'We're living through the fastest era of discovery in history...but we're just too close to see it.' Which decade gave humanity the biggest leap? A. 1960s: Apollo era 🚀 B. 1990s: Internet/genome 🧬 C. 2010s: AI/CRISPR/LIGO 🤖 D. Right now (don't see it) 🌌
Prof. Brian Keating tweet media
English
31
2
30
4.2K
Candy
Candy@realrawcandy·
@deepigoyal ipl ka season is your season too right? especially last 15 days
English
0
0
0
54
Deepinder Goyal
Deepinder Goyal@deepigoyal·
Hello everyone, here are the highlights from Eternal's last quarter – - Eternal’s Q4FY26 Consolidated Adjusted Revenue grew 64% YoY (like-for-like) to 17,680 crore - B2C NOV grew 54% YoY (4% QoQ) to INR 26,880 crore - Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA increased 160% YoY to INR 429 crore while increasing 18% QoQ (vs INR 364 crore in Q3FY26) - Blinkit NOV growth remains strong at 95.4% YoY (8.2% QoQ) - Food Delivery NOV growth at 18.8% YoY (-0.9% QoQ) - continues to improve for the third quarter in a row, inching closer to our long-term expectation of 20%+ YoY - Going-out NOV grew 42% YoY for the full year FY26 - Hyperpure’s overall Adjusted EBITDA margin improving to 0.5% resulting in absolute Adjusted EBITDA profit of INR 5 crore - 109 million Indians completed transactions worth over $10 billion through Blinkit, District, and Zomato in FY26 - Delivery Partner Welfare: ~₹200 crore in government benefits unlocked in FY26; expanding to 1 lakh gig & contract workers by FY27 - Greening India: 1M saplings distributed to 3,000 farmers across 6 states; 600K+ planted over ~5,000 acres (free of cost) - EV Adoption: EV delivery partners grew from 52K (Mar 2025) to 100K+ (Mar 2026) - Plastic Waste: 15,000 MT recycled in FY26; 60,000+ MT recycled since inception (100% plastic neutral initiative) - Feeding India: 1.4 lakh+ children fed daily across 2,300+ centres in 150+ cities That’s all for now. To our customers, delivery partners, business partners, policymakers, and team members: your support is what moves us forward. If there’s anything we can do better, we are always listening. Please feel free to share any questions or feedback at shareholders@eternal.com Full report here – drive.google.com/file/d/1mz_hG7…
English
110
53
775
79.9K
wahab
wahab@wahab_twts·
4 people racing to AGI. Only one gets there first. 🤖 Grok - Elon Musk 🧠 GPT - Sam Altman 🧬 Claude - Dario Amodei ✨ Gemini - Sundar Pichai Who wins?
wahab tweet mediawahab tweet mediawahab tweet mediawahab tweet media
English
588
421
2.3K
208.2K
Candy
Candy@realrawcandy·
@sama and your investors?
English
0
0
1
1.5K
Candy
Candy@realrawcandy·
progressive america is essentially a deregulated america.
English
0
0
0
23
Candy retweetledi
diyu
diyu@haha_girrrl·
Linus Torvalds is the real GOAT. Founder, Designer & Engineer
diyu tweet media
English
17
8
168
5.9K
Candy
Candy@realrawcandy·
@ericweinstein have you checked out the bob lazar podcast on JRE? it’s mind blowing
English
0
0
0
52
Eric Weinstein
Eric Weinstein@ericweinstein·
I don’t know that China is hunting “UFO scientists”, but I do know that they are poaching our professors and replaced our scientists in training with their Chinese nationals. And we are stocking PCAST with executives to consult, not scientists. Because we *deeply* don’t get it.
English
23
22
252
15.3K
Eric Weinstein
Eric Weinstein@ericweinstein·
Just going to point out the same stupid fact: It’s all very well that the U.S. has turned her back on funding, protecting and consulting American scientists as anything other than a servant class. But China, and to a MUCH lesser extent Iran and Russia, aren’t nearly as stupid.
Mario Nawfal@MarioNawfal

🇺🇸 A sitting U.S. congressman suggested China, Russia, and Iran may be hunting down American scientists tied to UFO programs. Rep. Eric Burlison said he "would not be surprised" if foreign adversaries saw an opportunity to eliminate some of the nation's top scientists connected to UAP information.

English
93
71
640
62.7K
Mumbai Indians FC
Mumbai Indians FC@MIPaltanFamily·
This team has lost the passion and aggression it once had.
Mumbai Indians FC tweet media
English
24
282
3.2K
26.7K