jamo

@LegacyProgramVP He's being positioned for this role behind the scenes.

@reck_ive Lmao no he’s not

“UAP Gerb” who is a “UFO expert”. 1) There is no such thing as an “expert” in UFOs. You can’t be an expert in something that is “Unidentified”. 2) Are you an expert in UFOs or UAP? Should have either went with UAP Gerb who is an expert in UAP or UFO Gerb who is an expert in UFOs. Just looks like cluttered BS. 3) Why wouldn’t you just use your name? You want to be taken serious but you have UAP Gerb as your name on a news segment. Looks so unserious. 4) You can’t be an expert on “UFO crash retrievals and reverse engineering programs” if you’ve not even obtained a clearance to speak about the existence (or in this case the non-existence) of classified programs. Sleuthing around on Google search and Reddit isn’t something serious people do. @UAPGERB So, the correct term is a UFO influencer who believes in UFO conspiracies.

@UAPReportingCnt @TheUfoJoe @InfinityDisclsd @rosscoulthart @chrisramsay52 Disagree. People tune in because he's real. The bombshell stuff is used ironically. Nothung wrng with having a high evidence bar. It's a good thing actually.

@reck_ive @TheUfoJoe @InfinityDisclsd @rosscoulthart @chrisramsay52 Its easy to "get on a roll" when you "BOMBSHELL" every piece of garbage you post.

Does George Knapp Work for Lue Elizondo? If so, what's the pay? 🙃🤡🙃 (In the post below, they discuss Gene Sticco (@InfinityDisclsd) and what he said to @rosscoulthart this. past June.) "Ross told me...there's been no debunks." ~@chrisramsay52 (Kind of early to be giving any weight to that. Here's a summary from Sticco's book, "Engineering Infinity," which I think you can get for free on his website if you share your email address. Note: Valerijs Černohajev was Sticco's father- in-law.) "Before his death on December 30, 2019, Soviet-Latvian aerospace engineer Valerijs Černohajev transmitted 119 handwritten pages containing twelve technical works to his daughter in the United States. Those pages describe a complete propulsion architecture — a 30-meter disc with 678,000 aluminum solenoids embedded in a silicon-alloy hull, powered by aneutronic fusion, generating thrust via magnetohydrodynamic interaction with a cosmic electromagnetic medium. The works were published posthumously in 2024." (I don't have an opinion on any of that right now and I'm sure most, if not all, of it is over my head. Sticco went on the Unvetted-bullshit podcast and claimed @LueElizondo told him (in October of 2025) that, "I can call @g_knapp right now. George works for me." BOMBSHELL! I'm confident in saying that George doesn't work for Lue and I'm very skeptical that Lue said that in any serious way. Sticco also said that after contacting Knapp and trying to get his take on the docs, he was asked to be on C2C (with Knapp hosting) to discuss everything. But Sticco found it strange that Knapp didn't want to pre-interview him. Gene, you should probably learn how George works before finding anything strange or odd. Sticco declined the interview because he wasn't getting up to 1AM for anybody. Sticco has gone on to do lots of interviews on various podcasts. He claims that he knows (his "read" and "feel") on, "this narrative-control structure on the Disclosure pipeline. That there is a system at work here in all of this, which decides what materials are going forward, and the rest of it. I've had people telling me about these email chains that are between a lot of these figures who decide who's gonna get amplified and what circuit they're going on. The marketing company behind some of the figures and how that company helps on the social media side." (Hmm, what company of that? I've never had help from anybody and have done okay for myself.) Sticco: "Who's getting the shoutouts from @JeremyCorbell and, you know. And it's all a lot of bullshit, there's nothing organic about it. It's part of the UAP- disclosure-narrative economy. I got like, all that is at work, that there's an entertainment machine at work here." (BTW, I'm not on any email chains and entertainment (which I don't do) does well on here so that's why so many accounts (like Vetted) sensationalize things. Sticco then goes on to praise Patrick for him being honest that he's not claiming to be an investigative journalist. Patrick also does no vetting of his guests and claims, Gene.) Sticco on Corbell: "I have no doubt [Corbell] is like, the sweetest soul in the world and sitting down with him...I'm sure, I have no doubt would be an absolutely-lovely experience. But none of that makes him an investigative journalist, none of it makes him a champion and a tough guy and, you know, all the show part of it, right?" (What makes one an investigative journalist? And please don't say their degree. Sticco then goes on to reiterate that everything that comes out, information-wise, is orchestrated. I've heard those claims forever but nobody ever proves it.) "Any time you spoke out against it, the dampeners came in." (Bullshit. I've spoken out plenty and have had no issues. Gene, I don't know what to think of those documents, but the fact that you went on that show is not a good look.)

@TheUfoJoe @InfinityDisclsd @rosscoulthart @chrisramsay52 That's a bit harsh! The name Vetted is a bit of fun, don't take it too seriously ok. His show serves an important role on the topic too. He's open to the phenomenon, but has a really high bar! If evidence comes out that convinces Patrick, we are in a good spot!

@reck_ive @InfinityDisclsd @rosscoulthart @chrisramsay52 To be fair, he's a 🤡 who does anything BUT vet his guests or the information he puts out on his channel.

@EldarMamedov4 Top goal scorer

Abolish the World Cup third-place match. It's cruel, not competitive. Players don't just not want it—they're emotionally hollowed out after a semifinal loss, forced to fake intensity for a medal nobody remembers. Fans know it; the players live it.

@ufo_ns @_Mithraic @UAPGERB Like flooding the zone?

@_Mithraic @UAPGERB I have my suspicions just like grusch controlled opposition.

Who are you really @UAPGERB CIA? DIA? DOD? 007 🔥

@RedPandaKoala They offered it and Grusch said no

I wonder if the Catholic Church will eventually grant sainthood to David Grusch for his role in UFO disclosure

@FettuccineSplit @UAPGERB This makes no sense. Greer isn't a practising doctor. What's gerb on about? Greer is disclosing testimony the same way gerb does. It ks the same witness even by the sound if it.

Flying Saucer Diner exposed Greer for what he is. @UAPGERB has balls of titanium. youtube.com/watch?v=HFLBDi…

@LegacyProgramVP @MiddleOfMayhem You're just kicking stones still after he embarrassed you a few weeks ago

@MiddleOfMayhem My thoughts on “UAP Gerb”

Wait... that's his real actual name?!

@pavelibarrameda Eeek! What a combo!

😬😬😬😬😬😬

@punyxpichu @MrMosis @UAPJames @UAPGERB Go watch his chat wkth astral. He literally says it doesn't exist.

False. 🤡 Patrick literally says, “Show me the source. Where is it? What are these special access programs? What is the information available? Crash retrieval stuff—whether that’s real or not, where is it?” He was asking for the source and evidence, not claiming “the legacy program doesn’t exist.” Stop arguing with a version of Patrick that exists only in your head. 💀

UAP Gerb contests JD Vance’s argument that the U.S. Govt couldn’t keep secret recovered UFOs and non-human pilots Gerb says David Grusch’s testimony to Congress and the National Underwater Reconnaissance Office are examples of leaks and the Government’s ability to keep secrets.

@punyxpichu @MrMosis @UAPJames @UAPGERB False. Pat said the legacy program doesn't exist. Another bad take.

You’re confusing a legal definition with identifying a real organization. 🤦‍♂️ The NDAA defining the phrase “legacy program” doesn’t tell us who the legacy program actually is. Patrick’s question is simple: Which agencies, offices, contractors, and people make it up? Funny how nobody ever seems to answer that part. 💀

@punyxpichu @MrMosis @UAPJames @UAPGERB Another example. Pat said JD Vance is lazy for not looking into ufos and said Michelle Obama had time to do the kids lunches campaign. Bad take. JD Vance is the vice president and Michelle was the first lady.

“Some of his takes are terrible” is adorable when you can’t name one, explain why it’s wrong, or provide evidence against it. Give me a couple examples—I’m happy to have that conversation. Or, just like the other YouTubers Patrick challenges, are you also against a friendly debate? I’m being honest, please leave a few clear examples of his bad takes. I’m ready to have this conversation. Calling it an “obsession” whenever Patrick responds to Gerb’s repeated public claims is just a convenient way to avoid the actual argument. Gerb says there are reverse-engineered craft and secret programs, validates Ross Coulthart through his own anonymous sources, and still provides nothing the public can independently examine. Patrick asks where the evidence is. That isn’t obsession; that’s literally the job. Gerb “ignoring it” doesn’t make him correct. It just means he avoids defending his claims while his followers do the yapping for him. Patrick is excellent because he reports the same stories everyone else does, then commits the unforgivable sin of asking, “What’s the source, and why should anyone believe this?” Evidence does not become optional because Gerb has a calm voice and secret friends.

@punyxpichu @Zazeronofshadow @AtlantisKalki @UAPJames @UAPGERB Please show me where gerb said the government is good at keeping secrets (as vetted claimed).

That doesn’t refute Patrick’s point—you just changed the wording. Saying “the secret has been leaking” means absolutely nothing when every “leak” is still an allegation supported by anonymous sources, unverifiable stories, and evidence the public cannot examine. Gerb listing more people who claim it’s real is not proof; it’s a circular trust chain: Grusch says unnamed people told him, Gerb says his unnamed people confirm it, and you call that corroboration. That isn’t “breaking down walls.” It’s several people standing outside the same locked door insisting they know what’s behind it. Patrick isn’t confused. You’re confusing repeated claims with independently verifiable evidence. Try again.

@punyxpichu @MrMosis @UAPJames @UAPGERB Pat asks what the definition of legacy program is and says no one has done it. That's a bad take. Gerb has defined and and it was even defined in the amendments to the NDA.

Calling Gerb a “researcher” because he talks to Burlison doesn’t magically make him a government investigator. 💀 He’s still a YouTuber compiling publicly available information, presenting claims, and often relying on scripted videos and unnamed sources, a.k.a “trust me bro”. 💀💀💀 Being knowledgeable on long-form podcasts proves he knows the subject; it does not prove the claims are true. And Patrick was not “suspicious because Gerb does MMA.” 🤦🏻‍♀️ He questioned the Barber connection and the credibility surrounding it. You reduced that into a dumb little caricature because the actual argument is harder to answer. So your examples are basically: Gerb reads public information and knows a congressman, therefore he “works with the government,” and Gerb can talk for hours, therefore Patrick is wrong to question him. That is incredibly weak

@punyxpichu @MrMosis @UAPJames @UAPGERB I heard Pat say the mma connection is suss. Talk about a reach. Even you would agree. That was a weird and bad take. Gerb has complied 100s of hours of information from various sources. Better than anyone else. To say he's not a good researcher is disingenuous.

@punyxpichu @MrMosis @UAPJames @UAPGERB Pat thinks gerb talking to sources is bad. Again that's a bad take. That's what good researchers do.

@punyxpichu @MrMosis @UAPJames @UAPGERB Pat says gerb is just a youtuber. But he's a researcher too and works with the govt through Burlison. He says gerb just reads scripts. Bad take. Gerb had been on long form pods and is like an encyclopaedia. Pat is suss on gerb because he does mma like Barber! That's a bad take

@punyxpichu @MrMosis @UAPJames @UAPGERB He's ok but you're giving him a bit too much credit. Some if his takes are terrible and just plain wrong. His obsession with gerb is weird too. Gerb to his credit has just ignored it

@MrMosis @reck_ive @UAPJames @UAPGERB No, that’s the UAP fanbase online—they just yap, exactly like you’re doing now. 💀 Patrick actually digs in, asks important questions, and examines every angle. That’s called nuance. You guys just bleed emotion and cry in his replies.