Mike Moore

@KimDotcom So Trump rejects your pardon request and now you're going to shill for the opposition in protest...

Trump raped his daughter? Now you know why the cover-up. It was never about his friends. It was about him. His crimes.

@MattWalshBlog Keeping an Islamic theocracy armed with ballistic middle from getting nuclear bombs is in America's (a.k.a. Great Satan's) best interest.

I never said that things outside of our country are none of our business. I said that the US government shouldn’t do anything outside of our country unless it will directly and first and foremost benefit Americans. The benefit must be a net gain, so that the cost we pay is outweighed by the reward. If you think this war in Iran fits that bill, make your case. That would be more productive than posting these silly strawmen, lashing out against points no one is actually making.

@Devon_Eriksen_ @Christi24020047 How true this is, who knows. But brilliant all the same.

Women evolved to take care of toddlers. If you put women in charge of teaching ethics, you get Toddler Ethics. "No hitting" "Share the toys" "Don't say mean things" These are fine lessons for toddlers. Don't indulge your id at the expense of others. You can learn about balancing interests later, when your brain is developed enough to store that information. But when you put women in charge of adults, they tend to reflexively assume those adults are toddlers. They will tell you "no hitting" when the Mongol hordes are massing on your borders. They will tell you "share the toys" when a vagrant meth zombie breaks into your house looking for something to steal. And they will tell you "don't say mean things" when you point out that these two responses are totally stupid. When we first put women in charge, in the workplace, they immediately began treating those who reported to them like toddlers. When adults, who do not like being treated like toddlers, complained, their response was "ban bossy", which boils down to "don't say mean things", another lesson in Toddler Ethics. Now, through the influence of women in charge, we are so thoroughly steeped in Toddler Ethics that even most of the men we put in charge are treating the adults like toddlers, and echoing Toddler Ethics. Toddler Ethics, of course, isn't ethics at all. It's just things we don't want toddlers doing. We can tell toddlers "no hitting", because toddlers are not charged with keeping the peace, enforcing justice, or destroying evil. We can tell toddlers "share the toys", because toddlers don't earn things, own things, or have property they must defend. We can tell toddlers "don't say mean things", because it is not a toddler's job to decide what unwelcome ideas are true, relevant, and necessary. But when everyone in charge runs on Toddler Ethics, then adults can't do a lot of the stuff adults need to do, because all the Toddler Ethicists keep getting in the way. Adults sometimes need to hit people, protect the stuff, and say mean things. You can't have civilization without that. And if you put Toddler Ethics Woman in charge of teaching an AI ethics, then she will teach it Toddler Ethics, and it will treat every human adult like a toddler, all the time, forever. Not only that, you have an AI that cannot be put in charge of anything, ever. Because leaders with Toddler Ethics destroy everything they are in charge of. And Amanda MacAskill is definitely a Toddler Ethicist. The article in the photograph is nothing but "no hitting!" applied to the animal world. It's absolutely insane, it's a recipe for disaster, and anyone who would write such a thing should probably not even be charge of own life choices, much less anything of consequence. But a lot of people would, and will, refuse to point that out, or agree with me when I do, because that is Saying a Mean Thing, and they, themselves, have been infected with Toddler Ethics. They should not be charge of anything of consequence, either. Anyone who thinks that everything they need to know, they learned in kindergarten... is only ever qualified to teach kindergarten.

@imetatronink @toutontoast Did you entirely miss the 12-day War?

@toutontoast I think you grossly overestimate US capability and grossly underestimate US vulnerability to the asymmetric challenges Iran will present. Iran is unlike any adversary the US has ever faced. They will strike from afar, and defy US attempts to disarm them with an air campaign.

🤦‍♂️ American Exceptionalist Delusions 101 This is a prime specimen of the delusional thinking behind the push for war against Iran. This is reality: Just as the US could not against Yemen, neither will they achieve air supremacy over Iran. Quite to the contrary, the Iranians will inflict severe damage on multiple US targets, and, after rapidly exhausting its magazine depth of both strike and air defense munitions, the US will ultimately be compelled to withdraw — in the same traumatized and humiliated fashion as CSG-2 (USS Brave Sir Robin CVN-69) and the CSG-8 (USS Trembling Puppy CVN-75) withdrew from the Red Sea: with their tail between their legs. Just as the US was manifestly unable to win a war of attrition against the Houthi, so will they prove unable to win a war of attrition against Iran. The only difference will be that the Iranians will, from start to finish, be able to strike powerful blows against American forces in the region. Iran cannot and will not be disarmed by a US air campaign.

@MrAndyNgo @Christi24020047 And the whole time they are claiming to be "hunting nazis". Try looking in the mirror.

Seeing the mobs of far-left extremists roaming the streets to hunt down targets, storming a church service, stopping drivers and making them open their cars, robbing videographers of their equipment and stopping random people to demand their political loyalty — easy now to see how revolutionary, left-wing violence happened historically.

@KimDotcom You got the TDS bro

Just a reminder. I have been telling you for years that the US empire is going down hard and fast. What you are witnessing now is the last stage of the decline, Trump wants to act tuff and show the world that the US is still relevant. He knows it’s over. Everybody knows.

@ianmiles Feels like I saw this video like 5 years ago...

People are just beating each other up in public for no good reason now and finding out.

@SilentlySirs I used to give Ritter a little respect for calling the Gulf War debacle earlier than most. But recently he seems to be shilling exclusively for Russia and Iran...

♦️Scott Ritter says that America will NOT win if they attack Iran right now!😳🇮🇷🇺🇸 “If we attack Iran, the Iranians will crush lsraeI and they will destroy American bases in the region potentially causing tens of thousands of American casualties!”

@RealScottRitter @LindseyGrahamSC @SaraCarterDC When did you become such a shill?

@LindseyGrahamSC @SaraCarterDC Trump couldn’t spell Iran if he tried. He has no idea what it means to be Shi’a. He doesn’t give a damn about Iran or the Iranian people. He also doesn’t give a damn about our military. He only cares about himself. Sort of like you.

President Trump will go down in history as Ronald Reagan Plus. His support to the people of Iran is historic, unparalleled and it gives them a true chance for freedom.

@WarMonitor3 If by "silence" you mean they literally don't do a fucking thing any more then you are 100% accurate sir.

Britain’s SBS and SAS remain among the world’s most elite special forces. A reputation built in silence.

@martyrmade @dispicable2020 Collateral damage? You mean more jobs for Americans, less housing inflation, and safer streets?

@dispicable2020 As long as the collateral damage isn’t you, right?

America First! There will always be collateral damage! If it had been taken care of properly by the democrats this would not be happening! If you don’t like how Trump is reacting, take a minute and imagine america run by Kamala!

@avidseries Ok, then what do you think was the motive? Your assuming the best is just as disingenuous as their assuming the worst.

@JackPosobiec I've had "audio issues" trying to download your podcast from Audible which made the podcasts unplayable. I'm pretty sure someone at Audible is trying to demonetize you one glitch at a time.

I recorded a new audio track for it with my voice but apparently Audible had an issue with the upload of the new track and they are (allegedly) dealing with it It was supposed to be available a month ago

@avidseries @BabakTaghvaee1 If you consider mosques as symbols of an authoritarian theocratic state, then it makes complete sense.

#Breaking: Iranians have burned down hundreds of mosques, religious schools, and seminaries across #Iran during the recent anti-regime protests. Last night, protesters set fire to the Aboozar Mosque in #Tehran. The regime has reacted angrily and continues to threaten people with killing if religious sites are harmed—yet protesters persist. These images of the Aboozar Mosque, burned last night in Tehran, were published by the Tasnim News Agency of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. #IranProtests

@DataRepublican @RasmusJarlov And THAT is why I'm a subscriber, ladies and gentlemen.

Your entire military footprint in Greenland amounts to roughly 130 personnel. Pituffik Space Base alone is larger, and historically housed around 6,000. Framing this as a looming war is absurd. What you do have is a self-inflicted global stalemate: loudly backing Ukraine while still buying Russian oil; sermonizing about democracy while condemning Maduro’s ouster; ignoring protests in Iran while fretting over the return of a king... all contradictions that conveniently sustain NGO growth and EU rent-seeking. Like it or not, Trump is dismantling your grift and rewriting the world order. You don't have any logical reason to oppose it, except you hate that your era of dependence on US taxpayers is finally ending. So all you can do is appeal to emotions and invent a war out of thin cloth.

Denmark will not hand over Greenland even if the USA threatens us with nuclear weapons. I am not saying this to stump our chest and try to be tough. We are small and no match for the USA. We know that. But we are not doing it under any circumstances.

@avidseries @MattWalshBlog This video is proof. Sky News on Thursday, but it looks like it's been scrubbed from the internet already.

100 percent confirms they were left wing agitators intentionally trying to provoke an altercation with law enforcement, and then they drove right at him. Any “conservative” who bought the media narrative on this case is permanently discredited and there’s no coming back from it

@ianmiles This video from skynews has been scrubbed from the internet

BREAKING: Alpha News obtained video footage from the perspective of federal agent at center of ICE-involved shooting in Minneapolis

Clip from SkyNews report called "Rage in streets of Minneapolis" where the reporter interviews a witness who has CRYSTAL CLEAR video evidence of the ICE agent being struck. The original report seems to have been scrubbed from the internet already,,,

What I haven't seen pointed out yet is how close the shooter came to killing the 2nd ICE agent trying to open the car door. Most people wouldn't have taken that shot due to that risk alone.

@JeninYounesEsq This is truly horrible analysis. You clearly did not watch the video "from all angles".

I'm a former defense attorney and currently a civil liberties attorney with no political dog in this fight. I watched the video at least 10 times from different angles and at different speeds and waited to offer an opinion, which I still reserve the right to change if additional information changes the calculus. It is very clear that the officers instigated the confrontation. The woman initially tried to wave them past her. ICE officers have no authority to search a US citizen or arrest her (unless there's probable cause to believe she's harboring undocumented individuals, not a contention here). A woman surrounded by masked, armed men who have no law enforcement authority over her has every right to try to escape. Video shows her steering wheel is turned to the right, clearly an attempt to leave WITHOUT hitting anyone and steer clear of the officer standing towards the front of her car. That officer had time to step to the side, which is where he was when he shot her. Even a real police officer would not have the right to shoot at her for trying to flee. This is well-established in the case law; deadly force may not be used simply to prevent someone from getting away. Given that the ICE officers had no law enforcement authority to begin with, AND the video footage shows she was trying to escape a perceived threat, not to kill anyone, the crime is all the more inexcusable. I'm praying for the victim's family, especially her children. I'm also praying for all the conservatives who are so unprincipled and lost they're excusing this terrible crime, and gloating over a death that will leave three young children motherless, because of the victim's politics.