Felix Macx

163 posts

Felix Macx banner
Felix Macx

Felix Macx

@releasepad

Every update you don't communicate is a feature users never find. Fixing that with @ReleasePad — AI-powered changelogs from your commits.

Katılım Nisan 2023
127 Takip Edilen30 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Felix Macx
Felix Macx@releasepad·
GitHub Integration: Your Commits Now Write Your Release Notes Every time you push code, your users should know about it — but let's be honest, writing release notes after a deploy is the task everyone skips. Not anymore. ReleasePad now connects directly to your GitHub repository. Once linked, every push triggers an automatic reading of your commits. Our AI then analyzes those commits and generates well-written, clear posts — categorized exactly how you've set them up — and publishes them to your changelog without you lifting a finger. 🔥 Here's what this actually means for your workflow: - You push code. That's it. ReleasePad handles the rest. - AI reads and understands your commits, then transforms raw technical messages into polished, user-friendly posts. - Each post gets assigned to the correct category (features, fixes, improvements — whatever you've defined). - Multiple posts get created from a single push if the changes span different areas of your product. - Your users stay informed in real time, every single time. Why this matters more than you think — the gap between shipping and communicating is where user trust erodes. Your team ships fast, but if your customers don't see those improvements, they assume nothing is changing. This integration closes that gap permanently. No more deciphering commit messages into human-readable updates. No more "we'll write the changelog later." No more backlog of undocumented features. The AI does the heavy lifting — turning fix: resolve null pointer in auth flow into something your users actually want to read. 🧠 Connect your repo once, keep pushing code, and let your product speak for itself ✨ #indiehackers #BuildInPublic
Felix Macx tweet media
English
0
0
2
158
Felix Macx
Felix Macx@releasepad·
Always a pleasure to read Jensen insights. Theory is bound to repeat itself over and over and over again.
Dustin@r0ck3t23

Jensen Huang just gutted the AI job panic with one profession. Radiology. The field AI was supposed to kill first. Jensen Huang: “Computer vision was superhuman in 2019. And yet, the number of radiologists grew.” Not competitive. Not close. Superhuman. Every forecast said radiologists were finished. Every forecast was wrong. Not slightly wrong. Directionally wrong. There are now fewer radiologists than the world needs. A global shortage. In the exact specialty AI was supposed to erase. Why? Because the task was never the job. Huang: “The purpose of your job and the tasks and the tools that you use to do your job are related. Not the same.” Reading a scan is a task. Diagnosing disease is a purpose. AI handled the task. The purpose didn’t shrink. It compounded. Faster reads meant more patients seen. More patients seen meant more disease caught. More disease caught meant more demand for the people who decide what to do about it. The tool did not kill the job. It fed it. Then the fear did what the technology never could. Huang: “The alarmist warning went too far and it scared people from doing this profession that is so important to society. It did harm.” People heard radiologists were finished and walked away from the field. Medicine bled talent it could not afford to lose. Not because the work vanished. Because the panic said it would. The prediction was wrong. The damage was real. Huang: “The number of software engineers at Nvidia is going to grow, not decline.” Not hold steady. Grow. The company building the infrastructure that automates code is hiring more of the people who write it. Huang: “I wanted my software engineers to solve problems. I didn’t care how many lines of code they wrote.” Nobody ever hired an engineer to type. They hired them to think. When the machine handles syntax, the engineer does not become obsolete. The bottleneck just moves upstream. To architecture. To edge cases. To the kind of reasoning no model handles alone. The world was never short on unsolved problems. It was short on people free to chase them. That is the part the fear narrative misses every single time. 340,000 women once worked as telephone switchboard operators. That job is gone. Nobody mourns it. What replaced it created millions of roles that nobody in 1920 had the vocabulary to describe. The losses are always visible. The gains are always invisible until they arrive. That pattern has survived every technological shift in history. It is surviving this one. The people forecasting mass displacement are making the same mistake as the people who forecasted the end of radiology. They can see the task being automated. They cannot see the purpose expanding underneath it. That blindness is not just wrong. It is expensive. Every person scared out of a career that AI will actually make more valuable is a cost the economy absorbs for nothing. Not because of the technology. Because of the story told about it.

English
0
0
1
16
Felix Macx
Felix Macx@releasepad·
Building in public tip nobody talks about: Your changelog IS your build-in-public content. Every commit is a story. Every release is an update. Every bug fix is proof you care. Stop writing "building in public" threads manually. Your git history already wrote them. 💥💥
English
0
0
1
25
Felix Macx
Felix Macx@releasepad·
I do see the value in all OpenAI and the other frontier labs are doing. But those circular economies are never a good thing specially when OpenAI revenue is that low.
Milk Road AI@MilkRoadAI

Morgan Stanley just mapped the most DANGEROUS money loop in history (Save this). Here is what the chart actually shows. One company sits at the center of over a trillion dollars in circular deals. That company is OpenAI. Microsoft gave OpenAI $13 billion and in return, OpenAI promised to spend $250 billion buying Microsoft's cloud services. Now add Oracle. OpenAI signed a $300 billion cloud deal with them. Oracle takes that money and buys Nvidia chips to build the data centers. The cash goes straight back into the same circle. Now add Nvidia, Nvidia invested $100 billion into OpenAI. OpenAI takes that money and buys Nvidia chips. Nvidia funded its own customer. Now add CoreWeave and Nvidia owns 7% of CoreWeave. Nvidia also committed $6.3 billion to use CoreWeave's cloud. CoreWeave then invested $350 million into OpenAI and expanded its contracts with OpenAI to $22.4 billion. Every player is funding the next player in the chain. Amazon is the newest entrant, they committed $50 billion to OpenAI. OpenAI agreed to spend $100 billion on Amazon Web Services over the next eight years. Amazon gave OpenAI money and OpenAI hands it back. Morgan Stanley calls this "capital inner circulation." The money does not come from customers or real revenue, it travels between the same giant firms in a closed ecosystem. But here is the danger, OpenAI's annual revenue today is roughly $13 billion. Its total infrastructure spending commitments are over $1.4 trillion which they have already cut in half. The new funds raised only cover some of what OpenAI has already promised to spend. The other depends on future revenue that does not yet exist. Morgan Stanley warned that AI capital spending is now on track to exceed 50% of all large-cap capital expenditures, surpassing the intensity of the dot-com bubble. The risk is systemic. Morgan Stanley warned these deals use off-balance-sheet guarantees, warrants, and revenue-share arrangements that hide the true leverage from investors. You cannot see the full exposure on any single company's books. If OpenAI cannot generate the revenue needed to honor these commitments, Microsoft, Amazon, Oracle, and Nvidia all take hits simultaneously. These are not small companies and their combined market cap runs into the tens of trillions.

English
0
0
2
74
Felix Macx
Felix Macx@releasepad·
@collision I wonder if the numbers add up.. usually a seat in business is twice as much as seat in economy. In this case it would be the price of 3 economy seats vs 1 in business. Interesting to see pricing..
English
0
0
0
78
Felix Macx
Felix Macx@releasepad·
@wickedguro The only area where you can see a big difference is when running local models in my opinion 🤓. I have the XDR as well and wished it supported 120hz.
English
0
0
0
3
Nevo David
Nevo David@wickedguro·
I ordered a new Apple XDR screen should arrive in a few days. I have an old MacBook pro 2021 max. I was thinking to upgrade to a new 2026, consulted a bit with ChatGPT and understood there is no reason. The difference between the 2021 to 2026 is only performance. Next year we will get a reboot with a new OLED display and a bunch of other cool features that are not performance. Apple make the M1 max too strong 😂
English
4
0
7
700
Felix Macx
Felix Macx@releasepad·
Product ideas are everywhere.
Milk Road AI@MilkRoadAI

Forget artificial general intelligence. Ireland just got Artificial Guinness Intelligence. Her name was Rachel, and she had one job. She called every pub in Ireland and asked how much a pint of Guinness cost. Rachel is an AI voice agent built by a London based engineer named Matt Cortland and the entire project took one long weekend and cost him €200. She called over 3,000 pubs across all 32 counties before anyone realized what was happening. More than 2,000 pubs picked up the phone, and over 1,000 gave her a price. Some bartenders felt sorry for her and offered to help if she could not afford the drink. Here is the part that should embarrass every government official in Ireland. The Central Statistics Office stopped tracking the price of a pint in 2011. One AI agent closed that 14-year data gap in a single weekend. The average pint of Guinness now costs €5.95. When the government was last paying attention, it cost €3.93 and that is a 48% price increase with no official record of it happening. The tools Cortland used are available to anyone with a laptop and a credit card. Most pub owners had no idea they were speaking to a machine. One call reached an automated hotel phone system, and two AIs talked to each other in circles for the entire call. Neither one got the price. Market research firms charge millions for the kind of data Rachel gathered in 48 hours. One engineer did it for the cost of a round at the very pubs he was calling. The economics of information gathering just changed permanently.

English
0
0
1
36
Felix Macx
Felix Macx@releasepad·
Two big lessons from OpenAI shutting down Sora: 1.Focus is and will always be key. 2.Distribution is stronger than any other force (again).
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta

OpenAI just exited the video generation business entirely. App dead. API dead. No video inside ChatGPT. Disney’s $1 billion deal, signed four months ago, is dead. Read that again. This isn’t a consolidation into the super app. Altman told staff Tuesday that OpenAI is winding down all products using video models. Disney’s own statement says they respect OpenAI’s decision to “exit the video generation business.” The Sora research team is being redirected to robotics. The reason is sitting right there in the competitive data. Anthropic hit $19 billion in annualized revenue by early 2026 selling text and code. No video generation. No image generation. No consumer social app. No Disney deal. One product surface: chat, code, computer use, all in one place. OpenAI looked at where every dollar of market growth was coming from and saw the answer: coding and enterprise. So now they’re copying the model. ChatGPT, Codex, and the browser merge into one app. Instant Checkout killed today too. Every consumer experiment is getting cut. What remains is the Anthropic playbook: one app, code and chat, enterprise and developer focus. The Sora numbers explain the urgency. Total consumer revenue across iOS and Android since September: $1.4 million. Peak month was $540,000. Every video generation burned GPU compute that could have been running inference for ChatGPT or Codex instead. OpenAI’s own head of Sora announced generation limits because chips couldn’t keep up. At $14 billion in projected 2026 losses, every GPU matters. Google just inherited the AI video market by default. Nano Banana already lives inside Gemini. No standalone app to manage, no separate brand to support. Among the majors, they’re the only ones left. Runway, Kling, Minimax, Luma, and the other independents are still shipping, but none of them have Google’s distribution. Disney put $1 billion in stock warrants on a product that lasted six months. The deal was announced in December. Characters from Marvel, Pixar, and Star Wars were supposed to be generating fan videos on Sora by now. Instead, Disney is writing a polite press statement about “respecting OpenAI’s decision” while its legal team unwinds a deal that never produced a single licensed video. Four months from billion-dollar partnership to obituary. That’s how fast the AI product landscape reprices when the unit economics don’t work.

English
1
0
1
63
Felix Macx
Felix Macx@releasepad·
Good Morning ! Question for the day: What's the worst release note you've ever seen? I'll start: "Various improvements and bug fixes." (I see it eery time I update my iPhone 🤯). Translated: "We changed stuff but explaining it sounded hard."
English
3
0
4
45
Felix Macx
Felix Macx@releasepad·
Your changelog in 2024: humans read it. Your changelog in 2026: humans AND agents read it. Your changelog in 2028: mostly agents read it. If your changelog isn't structured data with an API, you're building for an audience that's shrinking. #AI #DevTools #AgenticAI
English
0
0
1
7
Yannick Ferire 🐯
Yannick Ferire 🐯@yannick_ferire·
Here is the list of where I launched to improve my DR: Twelve(dot)tools – DR 80 @samuelpigny Uneed(dot)best – DR 73 @T_Zahil Peerpusht(dot)net – DR 72 @peerpush_net Tinylaunch(dot)com – DR 71 @chrissyinspace neeed(dot)directory – DR 71 @joulsounet TrustMRR(dot)com – DR 63 @marclou Foundrlist(dot)com – DR 62 @foundrceo Microlaunch(dot)net – DR 58 @SaidAitmbarek Trylaunch(dot)ai – DR 47 @alexmacgregor__ RankInPublic(dot)xyz – DR 46 @AntonioEscudero ConfettiSaaS(dot)com – DR 30 @ConfettiSaaSCom Launch(dot)cab – DR 30 @ffugenw Indietools(dot)app – DR 23 @AlxTurovski SaaSCity(dot)io – DR 15 @saascity_io Endors(dot)me – DR 13 @rezoundous Stackovery(dot)com – DR 1.7 @EmrikLecomte I keep ProductHunt (DR 91) for when my project will be 100% ready Also follow @jakobjelling for everyday backlinks advice! What is missing? Bookmark it to keep the list for your own launch 🚀
English
61
17
262
23.8K
Felix Macx
Felix Macx@releasepad·
@s_chiriac Sounds good!!! How long does it take to get listed on all directories using your service?
English
1
0
1
12
Sergiu 🤖 AI Directories
Sergiu 🤖 AI Directories@s_chiriac·
@releasepad Yah we have some good directories, that give good backlinks and we see the spam tag. Honestly I think ahrefs needs to work more on this feature. I think is not too accurate.
English
1
0
1
30
Sergiu 🤖 AI Directories
Some of the newly added directories on our list 👇 - GetApp | DR 85 | 1.9M traffic - ToolHub | DR 31 | 200 traffic - Indie Hackers | DR 80 | 5.0M traffic - AIChief | DR 52 | 90K traffic - AIpediaHub | DR 27 | 500 traffic - Startups Gallery | DR 34 | 68K traffic - Hacker News | DR 98 | 10.0M traffic - Peerlist | DR 76 | 650K traffic Carefully curated. Real traffic. Real authority. Check them all on @ai_directories 🚀
Sergiu 🤖 AI Directories tweet media
English
13
3
59
4K
Felix Macx
Felix Macx@releasepad·
🤖 Stages of AI-assisted development: "This is amazing" 💥 "Wait, what did it just do" "That's not what I asked for" "Actually... that's better than what I had in mind" "Ship it" "Wait did I tell anyone what we shipped?" checks changelog blank page "I'll write the release notes tomorrow" Tomorrow never comes The deploy went out. The feature works. But your users? They'll discover it by accident in 3 weeks and file a support ticket asking "is this new?"
English
1
0
5
171
Felix Macx
Felix Macx@releasepad·
Tell me you don't have a changelog without telling me you don't have a changelog: "Is this button new?" "Did something change on the dashboard?" "When was this feature added?" "Is this a bug or did you update something?" Your support inbox is your changelog — written by your confused users.
English
1
0
2
19