Remi

it's a million dollar invention.

Tennis players live 9.7 years longer than sedentary people. Not 9.7 months. 9.7 years. Nearly a decade. The Copenhagen City Heart Study tracked 8,577 people for 25 years and ranked every sport by how much life it adds. Badminton: 6.2 years. Soccer: 4.7. Cycling: 3.7. Swimming: 3.4. Jogging: 3.2. Tennis almost triples jogging. A separate study of 80,000 adults found racket sports cut all-cause mortality by 47% and cardiovascular death by 56%. Swimming hit 41%. Aerobics hit 36%. The question is why racket sports destroy everything else. Three mechanisms stack on top of each other. First, the physical demands. A tennis rally requires explosive sprints, lateral cuts, and sustained aerobic output. You're training fast-twitch and slow-twitch muscle fibers simultaneously. Most cardio only trains one system. Second, the cognitive load. You're reading spin, predicting angles, adjusting position, and executing motor patterns in real-time. Your brain is solving spatial puzzles at 80+ mph. That hand-eye coordination and strategic processing builds neural connections that protect against cognitive decline. Third, and this is the one researchers keep coming back to: you literally cannot play alone. Every racket sport requires another person on the other side of the net. That forced social interaction triggers neurochemical benefits that solitary exercise cannot replicate. Strong social connection alone increases your chance of longevity by 50%. Jogging is you and your thoughts. Tennis is you, a strategic opponent, and a community. Dr. Daniel Amen is right. The data is overwhelming. If you want the single highest-ROI activity for a longer life, pick up a racket.

When I was young I always thought that lifting weights is what defines real strength. When I started working with Gymnastic Rings in my Mid-Thirties I realized that strength has many layers. Together all these layers will make a person "real-world" strong. One layer alone is never enough.

lol

Fake houses in London, no way.

ElevenLabs just raised $500M at an $11B valuation. $330M in ARR. 41% of the Fortune 500 paying them. VoxCPM2 just made their core product a commodity overnight. 2B parameters. 2 million hours of training data. 30 languages. 48kHz studio-quality output. Voice cloning from a short clip. Apache 2.0 license, which means free for commercial use. Runs on 8GB of VRAM, which means a gaming laptop. The part that should terrify ElevenLabs shareholders: you can describe a voice in plain English and VoxCPM2 generates it from scratch. No reference audio. No subscription. No API key. Just a text prompt. ElevenLabs charges $0.16 per minute of generated audio. VoxCPM2 charges your electricity bill. This is the playbook that keeps repeating across AI. A startup finds product-market fit, scales to hundreds of millions in revenue, raises at a monster valuation, then an open-source model shows up and makes the technology table stakes. Happened to Jasper with ChatGPT. Happened to Midjourney's pricing power with Flux and SD3. Now it's happening to voice. ElevenLabs knows this, which is why they're sprinting toward enterprise agents and conversational AI. The $500M isn't for better text-to-speech. It's to outrun the moment when voice synthesis itself becomes worthless. They're trying to become the workflow layer before the model layer gets commoditized underneath them. The race now is: can ElevenLabs lock in enough enterprise contracts before every developer realizes they can self-host studio-quality voice cloning for the cost of a GPU?

Vinted has just announced €1.1bn of revenue and €62m of profit in 2025. The company became Lithuania’s first unicorn back in 2019, and is now valued at €8 billion. Today Vinted released their 2025 annual report and the results are amazing: > €1.1bn of revenue > €62m of profit > €10.8bn of GMV Vinted has grown from €11m of revenue in 2017 to €1.1bn in 2025. It’s become one of the standout companies to come from the baltics. Amazing news - congrats 🦾

God this is so much better than the recorded version

BREAKING - Passengers on an American flight from Atlanta to Puerto Rico captured one of the closest videos of the Artemis II launch from their plane, and it’s going massively viral, with some commenters expressing concern about how close the plane was to the rocket.

i can't stop thinking about the drift protocol hack. not because of the $280m. we've seen big numbers before. i can't stop thinking about how it happened. and what it says about everything we're building. on april 1st, while people were posting jokes, an attacker drained $280 million from drift protocol in minutes. the team had to literally tweet "this is not an april fools joke." but this didn't start on april 1st. it started on march 23rd. that's when the attacker created four durable nonce accounts. two tied to drift's own security council multisig members. two controlled by the attacker. quietly. no alarms. no flags. on march 27th, drift migrated their security council due to a routine member change. by march 30th, the attacker had already compromised a signer on the new multisig too. then on april 1st, they executed. a test transaction first. then one minute later, two pre-signed transactions fired four slots apart. admin takeover. withdrawal limits removed. a malicious asset introduced. every vault drained. jlp. sol. btc. usdc. over 15 tokens gone. the entire thing took minutes. this wasn't a bug. this wasn't a smart contract exploit. this wasn't a flash loan or an oracle manipulation. drift's own report confirms it (you can check @DriftProtocol's latest to confirm). no compromised seed phrases. no code vulnerability. this was social engineering. the attacker got 2 out of 5 multisig signers to approve transactions they didn't fully understand. used durable nonces to pre-sign them. then waited. patiently. for over a week. two signatures out of five. that was the security standing between users and $280 million. two out of five. i keep coming back to that number because this is the part that should make everyone uncomfortable. not the hack itself. the architecture that made it possible. we've seen this before. we've seen this so many times. bybit. $1.4 billion. the attacker compromised the signing infrastructure and tricked signers into authorizing malicious transactions. same concept. social engineering. not code. ronin bridge. $625 million. compromised validator keys. same story. cetus protocol. $223 million. different method but same result. hundreds of millions gone. in 2025 alone, $3.4 billion was stolen in crypto. and the pattern is almost always the same. not brilliant code exploits. not zero-day vulnerabilities. someone was tricked. a key was exposed. a human made a mistake. only 19% of hacked protocols even used multi-sig wallets. and the ones that did, like drift, got beaten anyway. because the weakest link was never the code. it was always the person holding the key. now here's what makes me angry. i've seen people dunking on solana over this. blaming svm. questioning the entire chain. the same thing happened after bybit when people started questioning evm and ethereum's security model. this is not a solana problem. this is not an ethereum problem. this is not chain-specific at all. drift's own report says it clearly. the programs and smart contracts worked exactly as designed. the chain did what it was supposed to do. a human was tricked into signing something they shouldn't have. that can happen on any chain. any protocol. any ecosystem. pointing fingers at solana is a deflection. and it's net negative for the entire space because it distracts from the real conversation we need to have. which brings me to circle. nine days before the drift hack, circle froze 16 business wallets overnight. legitimate companies. crypto exchanges. forex platforms. payment processors. no criminal charges. a sealed civil lawsuit that nobody could even read. no advance warning. businesses woke up and couldn't process payments, couldn't settle trades, couldn't serve their customers. zachxbt called it "potentially the single most incompetent freeze" he'd seen in over five years of investigations. one of the frozen wallets wasn't even a business. it was a dfinity bridge contract used by thousands of users who had nothing to do with the case. then nine days later, $280 million is being drained from drift in real time. the attacker is converting stolen tokens through jupiter, bridging them to ethereum, moving funds through circle's own cross-chain transfer protocol. and the freeze didn't come fast enough. so circle can shut down 16 legitimate businesses overnight for a civil case. but a quarter billion being actively stolen through their own infrastructure? different speed. i'm not saying circle is the villain here. i'm saying the system is broken in ways that should concern everyone. now think about who's actually affected by drift. it's not just traders. protocols are built on top of drift. neobanks integrate with defi infrastructure. real customers with no idea what a multisig even is woke up and saw they couldn't access their money. some platforms said user funds are safe. but nobody could withdraw. your money is "safe" but you can't touch it. think about what that feels like for someone who just wanted a better savings rate. i know what it feels like on a smaller scale. i lost $5,000 to social engineering. it's nothing compared to $280 million. but the feeling is the same. that moment when you realize the funds are gone and there's nothing you can do. it doesn't scale with the dollar amount. it's the same pit in your stomach whether it's $5k or $280m. and here's the question i keep circling back to. we say defi is the future. we say we're going to onboard the next billion users. we say this technology will replace traditional finance and bank the unbanked and give people financial sovereignty. but how do we onboard millions of people into a system where a social engineering attack can drain a quarter billion dollars in minutes? where 2 out of 5 signatures is considered security for $280m? where the attacker sets up wallets two weeks early, runs a test transaction, and nobody notices? where circle can freeze legitimate businesses overnight but can't stop a live heist fast enough? where the same attack, the same playbook, the same human error keeps happening year after year after year? ronin. bybit. cetus. now drift. same cause. different name. different chain. same result. defi doesn't have a code problem. it has a people problem. and we keep solving for the code. i haven't interacted with a protocol in a while. i like money. but i love safety more. and right now this space is asking me to choose between the two. security can't keep being the last conversation. it can't keep being the thing we talk about after the hack and forget about before the next one. it has to be the first priority. not the last. because right now we're not ready for the next billion users. we're barely keeping the ones we have safe.

STOP DECLINING SPAM CALLS. That “decline” can signal your number is active. So the calls multiply. Here’s what to do instead (and how to reduce them today).

In 2002, Quentin Tarantino, one of the most influential film directors in the world, walked into a secondhand clothing store in Tokyo, Japan. A track was playing over the speakers. He asked the man behind the counter if he could buy the CD right then and there. The man refused. Tarantino offered twice the retail price. The man eventually gave in. The band was The 5.6.7.8's. Two sisters, Yoshiko and Sachiko Fujiyama, had been playing raw 1960s-influenced garage rock in Tokyo since 1986. They had a small but devoted following. Almost nobody outside Japan had heard of them. Within a year they were performing in Kill Bill: Volume 1, one of the most talked about films of 2003, playing to millions of people in cinemas around the world. Their song Woo Hoo, a cover of a 1959 American track they had never considered particularly important, became one of the most recognised opening riffs of a generation. It hit the top thirty in the United Kingdom. It appeared in television commercials around the world. Their tours went from Tokyo to North America, Europe and Australia. Jack White of The White Stripes, who became a fan, helped release their back catalogue through his Third Man Records label in the United States. Interestingly, back home in Japan, almost nothing changed. Their profile there remained almost exactly the same. They are still together. Still playing.

not @0xedium. damn this is so good.

@tonyGewrit @0xedium 😅 no worries

very smart guy. this guy is teaching me alot more about @0xedium

everyone talks about propAMMs. only one actually allows permissionless deposits. imagine the same at integration. $OXE

@jussy_world @Pumpfun @JupiterExchange @Raydium @0xedium $oxe it's different 100% revenues will be to shared with stakers

*Projects that doing millions in revenue (should have a token) Do they? Because it doesn’t mean the token performs or you get something You really don’t get anything: 👇 @Pumpfun - $35M > $0.0087 → $0.0017 (-80%) @JupiterExchange - $5M > $1.8 → $0.14 (-90%) @Raydium - $1.35M > $16 → $0.56 (-96%) @MeteoraAG - $1.27M > $0.68 → $0.145 (-79%) @Kamino - $750K > $0.24 → $0.0165 (-93%) Millions in revenue Tokens still down 80 – 95% And NONE of them actually do revenue sharing with holders So what are holders actually getting? Buyback?*

integration integration integration. one approval before main stage. $OXE

$oxe @0xedium V3 fix this No quote gaming / artificial volatility V3 uses virtual reserves + internal algorithmic pricing → it stays tightly aligned with true market price (no flashing wide spreads to win the quote race). Better actual fills Zero internal slippage + liquidity consolidated in one tight price range → the quoted price is much closer to the filled price (exactly what the article says is missing). Lower toxicity / MEV Dynamic fees rebalance naturally instead of creating dislocations → significantly less room for sandwiching or arb bots to extract value (the “toxic flow” problem they mention). More deterministic & reliable Oracle-free design → no external data lags or freezes. This reduces the “unpredictable game” caused by scheduler changes every 1.6 seconds.

@0xedium $oxe will fix this Virtual reserves pricing → stays tightly aligned with true market level (no flashing wide quotes) Zero internal slippage + liquidity consolidation → consistent, fair execution without price impact Dynamic fees (instead of artificial volatility) → natural rebalancing with minimal MEV toxicity Oracle-free + any-token support → broader coverage without downtime risk

The price you see isn't always the price you get 🪤 Some liquidity operators are gaming aggregators and traders are paying for it. We're exposing how. Full breakdown in the replies 👇

@tonyGewrit Everyone different I had Hart palpitations and bad sleep so need to stop it , ginger and hibiscus tea only 😅

Been totally off caffeine for over 2 weeks now Have noticed 0 positive benefits Fascinating Does it take longer or is this a scam