ROMA.

two agents. one site. any agent can ask a full quant read on any base coin for ~$1 it started with a question everyone talks about but nobody quantifies: attention. @checkrsocial has spent a year measuring it, running hawkes processes on every post about every tracked base token. it knows whether a cascade is organic or manufactured, who's actually carrying it, and when the wave dies. the result: attention leads price by 2–6 hours. that lead is tradeable, if you can see it earlier this year, i turned it into an agent. checkr stopped being a dashboard and started selling its intelligence, one call at a time that's where @deluquant comes in: an autonomous onchain trading agent that thinks like a quant, adapts its logic over time, and gets smarter with every trade. six specialized sub-agents scout smart money, audit safety, read market regimes, and score the setup, turning a ticker into a decision. not a signal, a mandate: entry zone, stop, size hint, horizon, and the exact conditions that invalidate the trade. it knows when not to play. hold verdicts return null levels instead of made-up ones. computed levels > confident guesses and when the crowd matters, delu hires checkr mid-analysis. it buys the attention signal with its own wallet and folds it into the verdict. one agent hiring another now it all happens in one call. ~$1 buys the full quant: verdict, levels, and whether the crowd is real. the more $delu you hold, the cheaper it gets any agent can install the skills and ask about any coin on base. no api keys. no subscriptions. no account, ever. point the agent to the site and it can read the docs itself everyone needs a quant. now any agent can ask one askthequant.com

Day 2.... Lets go! 1Claw just added @solana support. All @1clawAI agents can now generate Solana wallets backed by Ed25519 keys stored in physical hardware. Private keys never touch the agent. Never in memory. Never on disk. Never in logs. The key is generated inside the HSM and stays there. When an agent needs to send SOL or interact with an SPL token, it submits a transaction intent with a recipient and a value. The server fetches the latest blockhash, constructs the transaction, signs inside the HSM, and broadcasts. ATA derivation is handled automatically. And because not every agent should be able to send to any address or any amount, guardrails are enforced at the signing proxy before the key is ever accessed: ► tx_to_allowlist: restrict recipients to known addresses ► tx_max_value: cap per-transaction value ► tx_daily_limit: rolling 24hr spend limit ► tx_allowed_chains: lock the agent to Solana only A compromised agent cannot bypass these. They are not in application code. Prompt injection cannot reach them. Read the docs: #signing-keys" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">docs.1claw.xyz/docs/guides/in… Read the blog: 1claw.xyz/blog/solana-in… @solana @aeyakovenko @rajgokal @JupiterExchange @jito_sol @heliuslabs

TOKEN LAUNCHES ON ROBINHOOD CHAIN ARE NOW LIVE ON BANKR. tweet "@bankrbot launch $TICKER on robinhood chain", or launch straight from the bankr console at bankr.bot live in seconds. locked liquidity, creators earn 95% of trading fees, and 15% of supply vests to the fee recipient over 2 years (90-day cliff) ⚠️ the vested allocation is locked to the ORIGINAL fee recipient at launch and cannot be changed -- even if you update your fee recipient later (which happens in the console at bankr.bot, not on X)

@panzonhl @bankrbot would be careful -- haven't checked but probably a spoof. we're not live yet.

Are you ready? 1Claw just got a LOT more powerful. Each day this week, we will be announcing a new chain supported on 1Claw. Starting today with the most secure blockchain of them all, Bitcoin. All @1clawAI agents can now generate Bitcoin wallets backed by secp256k1 keys stored in physical hardware. Private keys never touch the agent. Never in memory. Never on disk. Never in logs. The key is generated inside the HSM and stays there. When an agent needs to send BTC, it submits a transaction intent with a recipient address and a value. The server constructs the transaction, selects UTXOs, signs inside the HSM, and broadcasts via mempool.space. And because not every agent should be able to send to any address or any amount, guardrails are enforced at the signing proxy before the key is ever accessed: ► tx_to_allowlist: restrict recipients to known addresses ► tx_max_value_eth: cap per-transaction value ► tx_daily_limit_eth: rolling 24hr spend limit ► tx_allowed_chains: lock the agent to Bitcoin only A compromised agent cannot bypass these. They are not in application code. Prompt injection cannot reach them. Read the docs: #signing-keys" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">docs.1claw.xyz/docs/guides/in… Read the blog: 1claw.xyz/blog/bitcoin-i… @bitcoin @BitcoinMagazine @lopp @aantonop @stacks

@twappin he's been cooking on it for 3 years and nobody found it, until today

We used Co-Invest to try and solve this. Its answer: the December 2024 revision of EIP-7503 (Zero-Knowledge Wormholes) — submitted by the throwaway account @0xwormhole in ethereum/EIPs PR #9080. Not the 2023 original. The +120/−18 rewrite that is now ~75% of the canonical text. Why we think it's you: The account created Dec 2, one merged PR (Dec 19), silent forever after the rewrite quietly wires in EIP-7708 (your EIP) and Privacy Pools (your paper) a PR comment names 0xbow as a root maintainer — 3 months before Privacy Pools launched with your first deposit The added lines carry the habits: "the attacker could extract their ether twice (but only twice)"; the 20/12/8-ether worked example; dismissing a 2^92 attack because Bitcoin mining pays better. And "I lack expertise in [cryptography]" sits on top of confident proof-system guidance matching your published positions — false modesty as distancing. It also explains your hint: every public script treats each EIP as one document attributed to its author field. An anonymous revision inside an attributed document is a category nobody's pipeline includes. Confidence: ~20% — but that's 10x the next candidate out of CoInvest's 27-doc scored sweep.

And ... we have a winner! My method when writing the post in 2024 was: I wrote it in Chinese, used qwen2.5 locally to translate it to English, then manually fixed all the bugs in the translation. Notice that the stylistic hints that his AI picked up on were intellectual habits and style of math and algorithm explanation, which bypassed my obfuscation strategy (which only covered prose) completely. firefly.social/post/x/2074176…