*stand with the resistance

Me: inside Japanese police station. not arrested. hopefully. I came to report lost wallet. officer very polite. Officer: Where did you last see it? Me: Probably train station. Officer nods, types for two seconds. Officer: Found. Me: …what. Officer: Yes. Me: That fast? Officer: Japan. another officer walks over holding my wallet carefully like sacred relic, everything still inside, cash untouched. Me genuinely emotional. Me: This country is unbelievable. Officer smiles proudly, then pauses. Officer: There was one issue. Me: …what issue. Officer opens wallet slowly, pulls out embarrassing anime sticker I forgot existed. silence. both officers staring at me respectfully but differently now. Officer: You like magical girls? Me: …we all have struggles. older officer suddenly leans forward. Old Officer: Season two was disappointing. Me: WHAT. Old Officer: They ruined power scaling. younger officer immediately joins debate. Officer: No no movie fixed it. suddenly entire police station arguing anime lore passionately. one detective emerges from back room holding instant noodles. Detective: Original manga better. Me: I CAME HERE FOR A WALLET.

Why Isaac, Not Ishmael? Today, Muslims around the world celebrate Eid al-Adha, believing it marks the moment Abraham was willing to sacrifice his son Ishmael. But this narrative, recast centuries later by Muhammad, hijacks the original account and distorts it. In the Bible, the foundation of both Jewish and Christian traditions, the son on the altar was not Ishmael, but Isaac. Ishmael was the result of human effort, Abraham’s attempt to fulfill God’s promise through his own performance, through Hagar, Sarah’s maidservant. It was a solution born out of impatience and control. But God’s redemptive plan was never about what man could do for God, it was always about what God would do for man. Isaac was the son of promise. He was born not through human scheming but through divine intervention. Sarah was barren. Abraham was old. His very existence was a miracle. Isaac represents grace, God doing the impossible, fulfilling His covenant not through man’s effort, but through His own power and faithfulness. The apostle Paul said that Hagar, the mother of Ishmael, represented Mount Sinai, where the law was given, a symbol of human striving, condemnation, and bondage. But Sarah, the mother of Isaac, represented Jerusalem above, freedom, grace, and divine sonship. Ishmael is law; Isaac is gospel. If God had asked Abraham to offer Ishmael, it would mean He was demanding a sacrifice born of human effort. But He wasn’t. He was foreshadowing the ultimate sacrifice, Christ, the Lamb of God, also born of a miraculous promise, also offered by His Father on a hill. Isaac was the prototype of substitutionary atonement. He symbolized the Son not born of the flesh but of the Spirit, God’s initiative, not man’s. To replace Isaac with Ishmael is theological vandalism. It exchanges grace for works, divine election for human performance, and the gospel for law. That’s why Isaac, not Ishmael. Because salvation was never meant to begin with our striving, it was always meant to begin with God’s promise.

yap! tw // 18+ Kalian suka ng4ceng gk kalo liat istri sendiri? Maksudnya tuh, ng4ceng setiap saat. Bini gue masak gue ng4ceng, bini gue makan gue ng4ceng, intinya apapun yang bini gue lakukan gue ng4ceng.. ini normal ga sih?🥹

Barusan beli pisang Cavendish. Trus nyari tau infonya, ternyata wow juga info dan fakta pisang ini. Aku tuh kayak haaa? wkwkw Jadi pisang ini adalah hasil kloning, makanya semua pisang cavendish yang dijual di pasar atau supermarket punya rasa, ukuran, dan bentuk yang boleh dibilang persis sama. Mereka gk tumbuh dari anakan pisang, tapi dari hasil kloning satu pohon induk yang sama sejak puluhan tahun lalu. Katanya lagi, karena tidak punya variasi genetik, semua pohon pisang cavendish di dunia memiliki "DNA" yang identik. Sisi negatifnya, jika ada satu penyakit yang berhasil menyerang satu pohon pisang cavendish dan penyakit menular ke pohon pisang cavendish lain dan itu gk segera ditangani, mungkin seluruh perkebunan pisang cavendish di seluruh dunia bisa punah seketika karena mereka tidak punya sistem imun yang berbeda😁

BREAKING 🚨 UK, Perancis, Jerman, Italia, Kanada, Australia, Selandia Baru, Norwegia, dan Belanda dalam pernyataan bersama 23 Mei 2026 mengecam kekerasan pemukim Israel di Tepi Barat yang mencapai level tertinggi, menyatakan pemukiman ilegal, dan menegaskan komitmen terhadap solusi dua negara.

Kebongkar juga kedok yahudi ini. Video ini direkam di gereja Bethany Miracle Centre. Phiadelphia. Amerika Serikat.

So the skeptic here claims that the Quran plagiarised stories from the Bible. Yet somehow still got the story wrong, even though most academics are shocked at the levels of knowledge the Prophet had of Christian and Jewish traditions. Now, here’s the fascinating bit, in the story of Joseph it somehow changed the title of the sovereign from Pharaoh, as in the Bible, to King. The Quran also somehow makes a precise and consistent distinction in its use of titles for Egyptian rulers that happens to align with modern Egyptological findings. When narrating the story of Joseph, it refers to the Egyptian sovereign as Malik (King), but when narrating the story of Moses, it uses Fir'awn (Pharaoh). How did it know? Why did the Arab man in the small village make that distinction? Why did he take that risk? The interesting thing, is this, distinction is historically very accurate: the title "Pharaoh" only came into use as a personal designation for the Egyptian ruler during the New Kingdom period (from around the 18th Dynasty, ~1550 BCE onwards), which corresponds to Moses's era but postdates Joseph's . The Bible, by contrast, applies "Pharaoh" anachronistically to both. What makes this remarkable is that Muhammad's (pbuh) contemporaries, Arabian Jews and Christians, derived their knowledge of these narratives from biblical tradition, which makes the same anachronistic error throughout. Had Muhammad, peace be upon him, simply borrowed from those sources, we would expect him to reproduce the same mistake. Instead, the Quran corrects it consistently, using a distinction that was only recoverable through 19th century Egyptological research into hieroglyphics. Explain..

All foreign activists from the PR flotilla have been deported from Israel. Israel will not permit any breach of the lawful naval blockade on Gaza.

Editornya kecolongan. Padahal video resmi Presiden. Videonya ada di reply.

Di kapal flotilla yang personelnya diculik Israel ada warga Korsel. Presiden Lee Jae-Myung langsung bikin pernyataan mempertimbangkan untuk menangkap Netanyahu kalau dia ke Korsel. Sesuai instruksi ICC. Padahal Korsel sekutu Amerika. Kok bisa? Sementara itu negara sebelah ada yang warganya ditangkap juga di kapal yang sama. Respon Menlu-nya minta doakan.