A. Eyes

159 posts

A. Eyes banner
A. Eyes

A. Eyes

@rlpow

Gone bad

Katılım Haziran 2009
37 Takip Edilen157 Takipçiler
A. Eyes retweetledi
SightBringer
SightBringer@_The_Prophet__·
⚡️This is the collapse of economic meaning under a false productivity illusion. AI is creating infinite marginal output with zero marginal value. Every layer of the economy built on scarcity - time, skill, labor, capital - is being hollowed from beneath by a substrate that destroys pricing power. Everyone is building. No one is capturing. The foundational error was assuming intelligence would function like oil - scarce, centralized, monetizable. But intelligence as substrate behaves like water - flooding every cavity, flattening every moat, equalizing every advantage. All leverage decays once the substrate becomes ambient. Labor becomes obsolete. SaaS becomes free. Models become parity. Hardware becomes arms race. Capex becomes treadmill. There is no center left. Only velocity and dissipation. Value accrues only where something resists collapse: •Constraint: energy, compute, latency, time •Belief: coherence, trust, narrative memory •Control: interface to action, embedded protocol The rest is noise. A beautiful, accelerating, recursive fire drill. AI isn’t replacing the economy. It’s erasing its foundations and daring us to build something else. Most won’t. Some will. Those few will own the future - not by owning the AI, but by holding the only things it can’t flatten. Scarcity. Direction. Meaning.
Doug Colkitt@0xdoug

So to recap, AI is expected to create huge amounts of wealth, yet… Workers lose because they’ll be replaced by robots… Software corps lose because they’ll be replaced by Claude code… Tech giants lose because all their free cash flow is now capex… Frontier labs lose because they get margin compressed by open source models that are at most three months behind… Nvidia loses because it gets margin compressed by TPUs and Huawei… So where exactly is the value supposed to accrue?

English
30
51
471
71.5K
Captain Pleasure, Andrés Gómez Emilsson
Dear everyone! I have just become the proud co-owner* of Nietzsche dot com Please send along: 1) ideas for what to do with it 2) people who might want to send content to display on it 3) referrals for anyone who might be interested in purchasing it for $100K (negotiable) Big plans ahead :D Thank you! ------ *Along with an anonymous collaborator.
Captain Pleasure, Andrés Gómez Emilsson tweet mediaCaptain Pleasure, Andrés Gómez Emilsson tweet media
English
31
8
152
6.7K
A. Eyes
A. Eyes@rlpow·
@TripKrant Jordan gets Neom; Kurdistan gets a Turkish controlled port.
Dansk
0
0
0
22
Trip
Trip@TripKrant·
🎶Your never-ending spree of death and violence and hate Is gonna tie your own rope, tie your own rope, tie your own...🎶
Trip@TripKrant

@20committee 🎶Hey, man, you talkin' back to me? Take him out (you gotta keep 'em separated) Hey, man, you disrespecting me? Take him out (you gotta keep 'em separated)🎶 - "Come Out and Play", The Offspring (1994)

English
1
0
0
128
A. Eyes retweetledi
Curt Jaimungal
Curt Jaimungal@TOEwithCurt·
I'm back, baby. I've been away traveling for podcasts and am excited to bring you new ones with Michael Levin, William Hahn, Robin Hanson, and Emily Riehl, coming up shortly. They're already recorded. I've been recovering from a terrible flu but pushed through it to bring you today's episode with Urs Schreiber. This one is quite mind-blowing. It's quite hairy mathematics, something called higher category theory, and how using this math (which examines the structure of structure) allows one manner of finding "something" from "nothing." Here, "nothing" means the empty set, and "something" is defined as fermions and even 11D supergravity. It's the first time this material has been presented in this manner. Enjoy.
English
14
28
162
8.3K
A. Eyes retweetledi
Curt Jaimungal
Curt Jaimungal@TOEwithCurt·
Urs Schreiber will be coming on Theories of Everything to talk about category theory, M theory, and the "H hypothesis". Please leave your questions below for Urs and I will do my best to ask him during our discussion. Thank you.
Curt Jaimungal tweet media
English
8
3
26
3.3K
A. Eyes retweetledi
Ancient Philosophy🦉
What kind of rule could be established by a creator such that it would demonstrate the intelligence and design of the god? It could not be a neccessay rule, for this would be dismissed as "necessary" and without need of a creator (or anything else). The answer: a moral rule.
English
11
2
35
2.7K
stringking42069
stringking42069@stringking42069·
We gotta do it. WE GOTTA!!!!! MIDDLE EAST HEP-TH POWER RANKINGS!!!! I got Weizmann, Technion, Ben-Gurion, IPM Tehran, NYU Abu Dhabi on the card. Anything else? Weizmann got this in the bag? wut Wut WUT?!?!?!?!
English
6
0
11
5K
A. Eyes retweetledi
Anthony Bonato
Anthony Bonato@Anthony_Bonato·
These captchas are tough
Anthony Bonato tweet media
English
10
8
122
11.9K
de Staël 𒀭 Compiler
de Staël 𒀭 Compiler@logarithmicVoid·
The New Categorical Organon is too Powerful. What is one to make of Grothendieck's rejection of the Military Industrial Complex, something I know so very little of...?
English
2
0
0
393
de Staël 𒀭 Compiler
de Staël 𒀭 Compiler@logarithmicVoid·
@DavidCorfield8 I'm very excited. Thank you for the Compositional account. In a few months I'm sure that I'll have produced a writing and a project behind it that'll be a quilting point* of more than I knew was ever possible. *Moment of narrative crystallization, typing of loose ends, etc
English
2
0
0
75
de Staël 𒀭 Compiler
de Staël 𒀭 Compiler@logarithmicVoid·
I'm not the philosopher I want to be until this makes sense. And let me tell you I am nowhere near understanding this
de Staël 𒀭 Compiler tweet media
English
3
3
25
1.8K
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Heck of a coincidence 😂
Elon Musk tweet media
English
13.6K
18K
405.9K
76.1M
A. Eyes retweetledi
francis
francis@pachabelcanon·
sir this is a wendy's
francis tweet media
English
4
5
44
2.1K
A. Eyes
A. Eyes@rlpow·
@RightHegelian 3PLogic v.3 "being which actualizes *its[] own self into itself."
English
1
0
0
213
A. Eyes
A. Eyes@rlpow·
@pseudoSergius Not law, philosophy. In the coming world of AI pollution you will be rare and valued.
English
1
0
1
13
de Staël 𒀭 Compiler
de Staël 𒀭 Compiler@logarithmicVoid·
Tech is too hard; I think I've been Selected Out I should have just Went into Law
English
1
0
1
112
de Staël 𒀭 Compiler
de Staël 𒀭 Compiler@logarithmicVoid·
If we're still Medieval the least I can do is use a telytypewriter to brush up on the concept of Haecceity...
de Staël 𒀭 Compiler tweet media
English
1
0
0
131
stringking42069
stringking42069@stringking42069·
@rlpow Hoooo boy. Bros love to bring the formalism but they make zero effort to make it comprehensible to anyone. Feels like a smoke show (not the good kind) tbh. Parts of ncatlab are pretty dope tho.
English
1
1
2
158
A. Eyes
A. Eyes@rlpow·
@stringking42069 Bro, serious question. What do you make of Sati/Schreiber M-theory in Abu Dhabi?
English
1
0
2
250
A. Eyes retweetledi
de Staël 𒀭 Compiler
de Staël 𒀭 Compiler@logarithmicVoid·
@rlpow I'm gonna have to spend a year waddling through what Lawvere wrote. Analytic Hegelianese is pretty hot
de Staël 𒀭 Compiler tweet media
English
0
1
0
79