Robert Rand

28.5K posts

Robert Rand

Robert Rand

@robertwrand

Consulting, Acoustics. ASA, INCE Emeritus, ASCAP. Relax with my bestselling soundtrack (thousands do) at https://t.co/NSMuRYryHs.

Brunswick, ME Katılım Eylül 2010
1K Takip Edilen2.1K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Robert Rand
Robert Rand@robertwrand·
A central tenet of the Soundscape concept is that humans immersed in sonic environments are objective measuring instruments (New Experts), whose reports and descriptions must be taken seriously and quantified by technical measurements. -Wade Bray, 2012. acoustics.org/pressroom/http…
English
0
34
110
0
Robert Rand
Robert Rand@robertwrand·
@MassDailyNews Whatever Boston Schools *believe* that is, it’s not “education”.
English
0
0
0
12
Mass Daily News
Mass Daily News@MassDailyNews·
Boston Schools banned F's, hired $120K equity grading consultants, eliminated testing — then celebrated 'record' graduation rates, according to new bombshell report massdailynews.com/2026/03/21/bos…
English
223
703
1.9K
72.6K
Robert Rand
Robert Rand@robertwrand·
cc @Robert_Wessels @TheMaineWire the Maine administration’s goals for government education up to now, summarized.
Michael Strong@flowidealism

John Taylor Gatto was named New York State Teacher of the Year. Upon receiving the award, he quit and spent the rest of his life writing devastating critiques of the educational system he had mastered. Gatto argued that regardless of the official curriculum, schools actually teach seven hidden lessons. The first is confusion. Students learn disconnected facts across dozens of subjects with no integration or meaning. The second is class position. Students learn their place in the social hierarchy. The third is indifference. Students learn that nothing is worth finishing because the bell always rings. The fourth is emotional dependency. Students learn to surrender their will to a chain of command. The fifth is intellectual dependency. Students learn to wait for experts to tell them what to think. The sixth is provisional self-esteem. Students learn that their worth depends on expert evaluation. The seventh is that they are always being watched and have no privacy. These lessons, Gatto argued, are the actual function of schooling. The explicit curriculum of reading, writing, and arithmetic is almost incidental. The real purpose is to produce passive, dependent, compliant citizens who wait for authorities to tell them what to do and think. Trad schooling amounts to thirteen years of training in being passive and dependent. I have seen this play out with hundreds of students. When I created Montessori middle schools in the San Francisco Bay Area, about half the students came up through Montessori elementary and about half came from public schools. When we opened, the Montessori kids immediately began doing their work, taking initiative, choosing what to tackle first. The public school students were lost. They would stare at their desks until we walked over and helped them plan their morning. It took at least a semester, sometimes a full year, before they could function in an environment that asked them to direct their own learning. These were not less intelligent children. They had simply been trained differently. For years, someone else had made all the decisions about what they would do, when they would do it, and how they would do it. When that structure was removed, they did not know how to operate. Agency is natural to children unless we train it out of them. When I coach parents on evaluating their children's education, I tell them to ignore grades entirely. The question is whether their children are taking initiative, being responsible, and becoming empowered moral beings. If a child is getting straight A's but has no initiative and no sense of personal responsibility, that child is being damaged by their education regardless of how it looks on paper.

English
0
0
1
32
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH@NicHulscher·
🚨CDC data shows babies born are now dying at a >50% excess rate — YEARS after mass mRNA vaccination of young women. Mississippi just declared a PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY over soaring infant deaths, now linked to transgenerational mRNA “vaccine” fatal adverse events. The 30-year decline in infant mortality completely reversed immediately following the mRNA injection campaign in 2021. It hasn't gone down since. Excess infant death causes mirror those observed in vaccinated adults, suggesting transfer of mRNA "vaccine" genetic material to offspring — which was just proven in a recent study. A transgenerational crisis is here — children are dying who were never injected, but whose mothers were.
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH@NicHulscher

🚨BREAKING STUDY: COVID-19 “vaccine” mRNA and spike protein INVADE the human placenta and fetal cells—even in mothers vaccinated BEFORE pregnancy. Among 106 pregnancies: ⚠️37% of placentas from vaccinated mothers with NO infection contained spike protein ⚠️77% of spike-positive placentas had spike inside fetal immune cells ⚠️Spike detected in fetal blood vessel cells ⚠️Vaccine mRNA and spike protein found in placenta even when vaccination occurred BEFORE pregnancy These findings explain why infant mortality began to increase in 2021—immediately following the mass vaccination of women of childbearing age—reversing a 30-year decline. Governments, pharmaceutical companies, and regulatory agencies have committed a grave disservice to future generations. The long-term risks of in utero exposure to highly pathogenic spike protein of modified mRNA are unknown, yet these experimental injections were recklessly pushed onto pregnant women without adequate safety data. It really is time for criminal charges.

English
156
2.5K
4.1K
188.1K
Robert Rand
Robert Rand@robertwrand·
It's time to stop pretending noise level modeling is accurate to 1/10th dB as asserted by consultants working for the wind industry. A healthy design margin of several decibels is needed to prevent violation of regulatory limits. Health Canada determined that the ISO 1996-2 "Standard Uncertainties" for the ISO 9613-2 algorithm (used by the modeling for the Report) specifically for wind turbines, is +/- 5 dBA out to 1.6 kilometers (6080 feet), increasing at larger distances. There is no support in ISO standards for an assured, fixed average noise level at specific distances. The uncertainty is due primarily to atmospherics. These are beyond the control of the noise source operators. To ensure compliance with regulatory limits and prevent noise complaints from excessive noise, uncertainties should be factored into noise models with conservative design margins and operations management planning. So-called NRO (noise reduced operation) is not reliable in all atmospheric conditions and performance is not guaranteed by the manufacturers.
English
0
4
5
80
Robert Rand retweetledi
Dr. Paul Wilhelm | Advanced Rediscovery
You know what a wave at the beach looks like. The water goes up and down, but the wave itself moves sideways toward the shore. The motion of the water is perpendicular to the direction the wave travels. That's a transverse wave. Light works the same way. The electric field wiggles up and down. The magnetic field wiggles sideways. Both perpendicular to the direction the light travels. Every electromagnetic wave you've ever encountered (WiFi, radio, X-rays, the infrared heat from your coffee) does this. Electric field one way, magnetic field the other way, energy goes forward. That's all your textbook teaches. Now imagine a slinky. You push one end. A compression travels along the slinky. The coils bunch up, then spread out, then bunch up again. The motion of the coils is in the SAME direction the wave travels. That's a longitudinal wave. Sound works like this. Air molecules compress and decompress along the direction the sound travels. Here's the thing nobody told you: Maxwell's original equations allow for an electromagnetic version of the slinky wave. An electromagnetic wave where the electric field oscillates ALONG the direction of travel, not perpendicular to it. And this wave has no magnetic field at all. Why does that matter? Because every technology that blocks electromagnetic waves (Faraday cages, metal shielding, the walls of a submarine) works by the same mechanism: the magnetic field of the wave induces electric currents in the conductor. Those currents resist the wave. That's the skin effect. That's why your WiFi dies behind a thick wall. A wave with no magnetic field doesn't trigger that mechanism. No magnetic field means no induced currents. No induced currents means no skin effect. The barrier that blocks your WiFi doesn't interact with this wave type at all. It passes through. Not because it's stronger. Because the blocking mechanism doesn't apply. Heaviside's simplification in 1884 removed this wave type from the equations. Not because anyone tested it and found it wasn't real. Because it complicated the math, and the simplified version was good enough for radio and light. 140 years later, four independent groups put it back. Same wave. Same math. Different formalisms. None cited each other. The wave was in the equations the whole time. Someone simplified it away. That's the paper. That's the whole argument. The textbook uses 6 of 16 electromagnetic components. The other 10 describe this wave, and more.
Dr. Paul Wilhelm | Advanced Rediscovery tweet media
Daniel@spindriftaz

@drxwilhelm Help me. I’m stuck in the Lorenz rut. I can visualize E and B waves just fine. I can’t visualize scalar waves (and longitudinal waves, for that matter). Explain it to me like you’re Feynman…

English
28
78
362
25.2K
Robert Rand retweetledi
SightBringer
SightBringer@_The_Prophet__·
Musk is trying to replace the modern West’s dead moral center with an expansionist one. That is what this really is. The old legitimating story in the West is exhausted. Liberalism reduced meaning to comfort, rights, consumption, and procedural management. It can govern a wealthy plateau for a while, but it cannot inspire a civilization to build at terrifying scale. It cannot justify sacrifice, mobilization, or species-level ambition. So once growth slows, the whole thing starts decomposing into redistribution fights, identity rituals, bureaucratic self-protection, and scarcity morality. Musk sees that vacuum clearly. “Kardashev II” is his attempt to fill it with a new civilizational command: grow power, grow intelligence, grow reach, or accept decline. That is why the line sounds grandiose. It is about moral permission. He is trying to make extreme expansion feel like virtue again. And deep down, that matters because modern people have forgotten what energy actually is in civilizational terms. They treat it like a utility bill or a carbon argument. Energy is sovereignty. Energy is military power. Energy is compute. Energy is industrial depth. Energy is desalination, transport, AI training, materials, housing construction, robotics, healthcare, defense, orbital launch, and eventually planetary resilience. Every elegant theory about the future collapses if the energy base is weak. A civilization with insufficient power generation becomes spiritually cramped because it is forced to moralize limits. Once you cannot build enough, every political argument turns into rationing disguised as ethics. Musk’s core intuition is that scarcity politics eventually corrupts the soul of a civilization. People start calling weakness wisdom. They rename paralysis as balance. They take underbuilding, underpowering, and underproducing and dress it up as maturity. In reality it is fear, decadence, and loss of nerve. A high-energy civilization behaves differently. It can be generous because it has surplus. It can be curious because it has slack. It can be ambitious because it is not trapped in zero-sum domestic cannibalism. The darker layer is that he is also making a dominance statement. Civilizations that build the energy-compute-industry stack will define reality for everyone else. Civilizations that do not will end up downstream of foreign power. This century is going to sort nations by who can integrate grids, semiconductors, robotics, AI, manufacturing, and launch capacity into one coherent machine. The rhetoric around values will matter less than the hard substrate. Whoever owns the substrate writes the terms of the future.
English
58
136
901
104.3K
EKO
EKO@EkoLovesYou·
You always knew Mueller was dirty. But did you know he was installed as FBI Director seven days before 9/11 in complete secrecy? No ceremony. No press. First time in history. Within 72 hours, he fires the bin Laden expert, blocks the Moussaoui investigation, and destroys the Able Danger data that identified the hijackers in 1999. Here's Episode 1 of the 9/11 Machine. Not theory. Receipts, organized for posterity:
EKO@EkoLovesYou

x.com/i/article/1965…

English
44
730
1.5K
53.1K
Eric S. Raymond
Eric S. Raymond@esrtweet·
The Iron Law: "The expected value of any net impact assessment of any large-scale social program is zero." The Stainless Steel Law: "The better designed the impact assessment of a social program, the more likely is the resulting estimate of net impact to be zero." This is from an expert who desperately wanted the conclusion to be the opposite. But the impact is never zero. It's always, actually negative. Because the money taken from taxpayers at gunpoint and spent on these programs is wasted. The effect is value destruction.
Crémieux@cremieuxrecueil

Across basically every metric, the results were null, null, and--my favorite--null. And this is what we expect with credible intervention evaluations of high-quality samples. This is so common, in fact, that it's been dubbed the "Stainless Steel Law":

Malvern, PA 🇺🇸 English
197
740
3.1K
1.1M
DogeDesigner
DogeDesigner@cb_doge·
ELON MUSK: "Space solar actually costs less than terrestrial solar because you don't need heavy glass or framing to protect it from extreme weather events. So as soon as the cost to orbit drops to a low number, it immediately makes extremely compelling sense to put AI in space. It becomes a no brainer. Basically, more of a as you go to space, you get increased economies of scale, and things get easier over time, whereas as you try to put more and more power on the ground, you run out of space and you start using up the easy spots, and then you get next level. Nobody wants the thing in their backyard. So then increasing power on earth has becomes harder over time and more expensive over time, but in space it becomes actually cheaper and easier over time."
English
947
1.5K
8.4K
17.2M
Robert Rand
Robert Rand@robertwrand·
@pepethuglife @yoursimmo11 “safe per regulators” and “no evidence” from manufacturer? Zero analytical thinking, perplexity just tapped itself out.
English
0
0
0
18
Simmo
Simmo@yoursimmo11·
I used Colgate, a fluoride-based toothpaste, twice a day, every day since I was a child. Little did I realize that Fluoride competes with iodine at thyroid receptor sites. Same receptors and direct competition. Your thyroid needs iodine to produce T3 and T4. Fluoride blocks the door. You're delivering a thyroid-suppressing chemical through the most absorbent tissue in your body. Twice daily. And your dentist told you it was essential. Hydroxyapatite toothpaste remineralizes teeth without touching your endocrine system. Been around for decades. Japan uses it as standard.
English
420
3K
22.8K
1.9M
Robert Rand retweetledi
Massimo
Massimo@Rainmaker1973·
This is how Shazam works.
English
16
403
2K
166.4K
Robert Rand retweetledi
Dr. Paul Wilhelm | Advanced Rediscovery
🪦 The theory behind light, radio, and WiFi was originally 20 equations. In 1884, Oliver Heaviside rewrote it into 4. Physics called it a triumph. It was also a deletion. Maxwell's original formulation used Hamilton's quaternions. The nabla operator acting on the potential produces a full quaternion with both scalar and vector parts. The vector part gives the magnetic field B = ∇ × A. The scalar part defines a seventh field component that has no counterpart in the modern four equations. Heaviside and Gibbs split this single algebraic operation into two independent ones (divergence and curl) and then suppressed the scalar part. Not because it was shown to be unphysical. Because it complicated the equations. Heaviside was explicit about his intent. He found potentials "mystical" and sought to "murder them from the theory." In a letter to Oliver Lodge, he claimed his reformulation represented "the real and true Maxwell" as Maxwell would have written it had he not been "humbugged by his vector and scalar potentials." Hertz went further, declaring potentials "not physical magnitudes" but useful "for calculations only." Gibbs acknowledged the trade-off: the scalar and vector parts "represented important operations, but their union did not seem a valuable idea." What survived was neither man's preference but a compromise that stripped all potentials of physical status. The elimination was not a unified program but an accidental consensus. Then in 1959 Aharonov and Bohm predicted that the potential produces measurable effects in regions where E = 0 and B = 0. The definitive experiment came in 1986: Osakabe et al. enclosed a toroidal magnet in a superconducting niobium shell, guaranteeing complete field confinement. The shift was exactly as predicted. The vector potential is not a mathematical abstraction. It is Faraday's "electrotonic state." A store of field momentum available for exchange with charged particles. Heaviside's simplification works for everything 19th-century physics could measure. It's incomplete for everything discovered since. The full history of all three deletions, including how the Lorenz gauge was misattributed to the wrong physicist for a century, is in Section 3 of my paper "The Deleted Degrees of Freedom." Free, open access. Pinned on my profile.
Dr. Paul Wilhelm | Advanced Rediscovery tweet media
English
23
93
515
19.8K
Sami Nathaniel
Sami Nathaniel@NathanielSami·
FINALLY! This is Massively overdue.!!!
English
510
4.2K
12.2K
66.4K
Katie Miller
Katie Miller@KatieMiller·
New Medicare fraud just dropped. An illegal alien from Azerbaijan stole more than $90 million from the American people by filing false claims for medical equipment. Illegal aliens are robbing our country blind. Fraud is happening at large scale — especially in blue states where they are fighting so hard to cover it up. sfchronicle.com/crime/article/…
English
615
7.7K
14.8K
123.4K
The Maine Wire
The Maine Wire@TheMaineWire·
Dems in the legislature have cooked up a new scheme to tackle illegal Chinese marijuana grows. The plan was endorsed by the Maine Chiefs of Police Association. It's not going to work. Here's an idea... Why don't they just arrest the bad guys?
English
24
217
599
7.7K