Rob Wilson

693 posts

Rob Wilson

Rob Wilson

@robwilson09

Just trying to figure out what the hell is going on...

Katılım Mayıs 2009
23 Takip Edilen19 Takipçiler
PUTMAN Logic
PUTMAN Logic@putmanmodel·
@Quadcarl Maybe in the future, wars won’t be fought by killing each other, but through memes and AI-generated propaganda wars.
English
8
2
297
18.6K
Quadcarl
Quadcarl@Quadcarl·
We got the White House posting pixelated images of Trump while the IRCG is trolling with these videos. I can’t even tell who’s serious anymore.
English
420
4.1K
29.8K
2.4M
Kirsti Miller
Kirsti Miller@KirstiMiller30·
In Australia, Kirsty Coventry is going to have to convince the Australian Federal Court that I have an unfair strength, speed, endurance, and/or physique disparity over every single elite female athlete in the Olympic Movement, good luck. My body has not produced testosterone for 26 years, and it does not have the ability to do so. I have -3.2 osteoporosis and a lung disease and complete muscle atrophy; I am 5ft 7in and 56 kilograms with F cup breasts. I know the IOC has zero research to show I have an advantage in any sport. The burden to prove the advantages is on Kirsty!! sbs.com.au/news/article/a…
Tracey Holmes@TraceyLeeHolmes

Sex testing is back for the Olympics; u-turn on inclusion first as a starting point. While the science is contested, the IOC says this is done with science and athlete consensus at its heart. Some who work in safeguarding and human rights disagree. #sextesting #Olympics #safeguarding #inclusion

English
12
6
41
2.2K
Kirsti Miller
Kirsti Miller@KirstiMiller30·
I am going to make K Coventry stand in an Australian human rights witness box and argue with Kirsti Miller30. Ban Warren by all means, but don't ban Kirsti! I can prove I have zero advantage. The last IOC policy almost took my life away. I ended up in the ICU! @TraceyLeeHolmes
Kirsti Miller tweet media
English
4
2
16
534
Rob Wilson
Rob Wilson@robwilson09·
@nyaraVT If you can't do the time, don't do the crime
English
1
0
0
206
Sek-Raktaa
Sek-Raktaa@timberwolf9470·
@robwilson09 @nyaraVT The ‘new information’ refers to modern medical standards, which treat trans girls as girls and trans boys as boys for care. That’s the framework you seem to have difficulty understanding. Which is why I provided you with a list of things to Google and do your own reading.
English
1
0
0
13
Sage
Sage@SageStarwind·
@stacycay We're going to have another incident where a female athlete gets told she's "not a woman" by the IOC then gives birth.
English
18
9
343
11.6K
Rob Wilson
Rob Wilson@robwilson09·
@timberwolf9470 @nyaraVT The original post was about 'new information' that shows boys are girls. You reply saying it isn't a mental illness. I didn't move the goalpost. It is the same. Boys <> girls
English
1
0
0
15
Sek-Raktaa
Sek-Raktaa@timberwolf9470·
@robwilson09 @nyaraVT ICD‑11 and DSM‑5 show being trans isn’t a mental illness. Your ‘boy/girl’ line is a rhetorical dodge, not a rebuttal. The consensus stands. Facts don’t shrink because you pivot. Move the goalposts elsewhere.
English
1
0
0
19
Kirsti Miller
Kirsti Miller@KirstiMiller30·
🧒 Guides have accepted trans girls for years & not a single incident has occurred where a trans girl hurt a sis girl in any way. But all over the 🌍 🧒 guides have been sexually abused by both female guide leaders. This breaches international human rights frameworks which include provisions for when we can justify what is otherwise discriminatory. There’s a 4-fold test. First, the policy must be in service of a worthy social goal. We have prisons & override the right to freedom of movement, partly on the grounds that doing so is in service of the worthy social goal of ‘promoting public safety.’  We can argue about whether this is effective, but the first test is merely to ensure that policies are in service of a worthy social goal. Second, the policy must be necessary for the promotion of the worthy social goal. If we can achieve the worthy social goal without infringing upon human rights, then we must.  We can only potentially be justified in overriding human rights if doing so is necessary for promoting a worthy social goal. Arguably, the death penalty is not necessary for promoting public safety, and thus arguably fails this second test.  For our purposes, the one issue is whether excluding trans girls from the Girl Guides is necessary for promoting fairness in the Girl Guides.  Third, the policy must be effective at promoting the worthy social goal. Even if a discriminatory policy might be judged necessary for promoting a worthy social goal, if it isn’t effective at doing so, then it fails to be justified. A primary justification for the death penalty is to deter other crime. Arguably, evidence suggests that the death penalty is not effective at such deterrence. & since there are other methods capable of preventing someone from reoffending, the death penalty is neither necessary nor effective, and so is not justified.  Finally, the benefit from promoting the worthy social goal must be proportional to the harm caused to the group or individuals discriminated against by the policy. Generally, policies that discriminate against already vulnerable or stigmatised social groups, even if they are necessary and effective in service of a worthy social goal, will fail to be sufficiently proportional.  Appeal to the small size of a group will not suffice, either: the proportionality test is not a utilitarian calculus whereby a large group can benefit greatly at the expense of a few. For our purposes, this issue is whether the harm to trans girls caused by excluding them from Girl Guides is proportional to any proposed benefit to (c_s) Girl Guides. What’s most crucial about human rights is that the default position is inclusion. The default is not Exclude trans girl guides until we have more evidence about there not being an advantage or an inherent risk to danger. Rather, the default must be Include trans girls unless we have sufficient evidence to justify discrimination in an international human rights framework. This is why the human rights framework controls this “debate.” Trans girls don’t have to justify their inclusion. The burden of argument is entirely on those who seek to exclude them. And that burden has not yet been met for any female space including female sports, and is unlikely ever to be met. Trans-blanket-exclusionary policies fail on every measure, none of the blanket ban policies are plausible in providing service of worthy social goals in female spaces. Finally, trans girls are a heavily stigmatised and marginalized group, particularly trans girls of color, and particularly trans girls of color from the global south.  And since the benefits to society of discriminatory policies that further harm an already marginalized, stigmatized group tend not to be proportional, excluding trans girls also fails the proportionality test.  Excluding trans girls is not justified under an international human rights framework, under which the participation in public spaces as a human right is subsumed.
English
28
3
34
2.5K
Harry Eccles
Harry Eccles@Heccles94·
Can someone tell me how banning trans children from girl guides protects women’s safety?
English
825
45
455
38.4K
Sek-Raktaa
Sek-Raktaa@timberwolf9470·
@robwilson09 @nyaraVT If your ‘critical thinking’ were half as strong as your self‑confidence, you’d have typed this into Google already. Search: ‘history of gender dysphoria diagnosis’, ‘WPATH standards evolution’, ‘APA DSM changes trans’, ‘ICD‑11 gender incongruence medical consensus’. Happy reading
English
1
0
0
20
Donhill44
Donhill44@donhill44·
@NothingWasScary People don't get hit enough in real life. I honestly believe that. If refusing service to a guy over a hat came with the likelihood of getting smacked, then you'd think twice. Mike Tyson was right, people are too comfortable.
English
8
0
8
1.5K
Rob Wilson
Rob Wilson@robwilson09·
@Molycuddle You know Orwell actually wrote that, right? He was left, but left-critical. Something that has been abandoned by the left.
English
0
0
0
75
Rob Wilson
Rob Wilson@robwilson09·
@timberwolf9470 @nyaraVT OK cultist. If you have no receipts, you have no argument. OP wrote "new information" with no proof. I have what is called critical thinking and it is a barrier you can't overcome with "feelings".
English
1
0
0
20
Sek-Raktaa
Sek-Raktaa@timberwolf9470·
@robwilson09 @nyaraVT The medical consensus since the 1950s is clear: being trans isn’t a mental illness. That’s decades of research. I’m not your personal Google though. Info’s there, go read it yourself, lazy butt.
English
1
0
0
20
Aleksi Majander
Aleksi Majander@WampieHS·
@Mild_Dawged @Skyline_Husky Using money as emphasis is finicky. You cannot go too high "I will pay million if.." bc everyone knows you don't have a million, but you cannot go too low either, bc it shows you don't 100% trust in your claim. For me, if you don't go in 1000s it shows doubt.
English
9
0
0
1.4K
SKYLINE HUSKY
SKYLINE HUSKY@Skyline_Husky·
I will donate $100 to a Trans charity of your choice if you can show me undeniable proof she said "KILL ALL TRANS PEOPLE"
Aipom🔥🔥@SilverAipom

English
279
373
15.9K
1.4M
☠️ Lilith Lovett ☠️ same @ on 💙☁️🦋
I do not want to be “brave”. I don’t care about being “valid”. I have no interest in “defying patriarchal beauty standards” or “deconstructing gender roles”. I just want to be happy.
☠️ Lilith Lovett ☠️ same @ on 💙☁️🦋 tweet media
fleur du mal@vermilionAKIHA

these people are talking about rib remodeling surgery like it's a standard procedure and not an egregious, insane example of how misogyny turns your mind into liquid waste in the pursuit of validation

English
32
292
2.7K
52.3K
Rob Wilson
Rob Wilson@robwilson09·
@sex_pervert "unimaginable pain society forces them to endure" - aka life
English
0
0
2
49
Léa🐞🚜🛟
Léa🐞🚜🛟@sex_pervert·
Hmm how should trans women refer to the unimaginable pain society forces them to endure in their formative years? This Fictional Entertainment Genre of course!! I take your pain very seriously!!!
🌈 Ver 💐@StylistVer

@futarch @nyanqueer_wren Body horror was right there??? Literally come up with a new term if that doesn't feel like it fully encompasses the trauma caused but biological body horror is not rape. Biological body horror is your body betraying you in ways you can't control it's biological self betrayal.

English
18
91
1.3K
39.7K
Rob Wilson
Rob Wilson@robwilson09·
@jclib1990 So you don't believe in sex-based legal classes? Why not?
English
0
0
0
15