Luke Roddis

99 posts

Luke Roddis banner
Luke Roddis

Luke Roddis

@roddis_

Englishman. Software Developer

Derbyshire, England Katılım Ocak 2026
68 Takip Edilen13 Takipçiler
Luke Roddis
Luke Roddis@roddis_·
@GamesNosh Even if a constituency 100% voted Green with a 100% turnout it's still morally wrong and vindictive. I want a government that is only interested in making the country better, not trying to enact revenge
English
1
0
6
304
GamesNosh 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
What a petty and vindictive little cretin Matt Badloser is. Lost his election, so throws the 10,000 people that voted for him under the bus and says they deserve to be swamped with migrants. What a winning message!
GamesNosh 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 tweet media
English
8
4
48
17.6K
Luke Roddis
Luke Roddis@roddis_·
@firasmodad Political vindictiveness and revenge on adversaries should be called out regardless of who does it. It is often a left-wing coded thing to do; hence things like wealth taxes and private school VAT. This is Reform behaving with spite and contempt
English
1
0
6
244
Firas Modad
Firas Modad@firasmodad·
A foreigner's brief take: When a modern Muslim dictator realises that he is unpopular in a certain region, said region loses all development money. Its children no longer get government jobs. The security forces double down on their usual cruelty. Regular ritual humiliation follows. That said, none of these dictators unleashed foreign men to rape and murder his country's children. Reform and Zia Yusuf are hitting a new low. A nation is a family of families. Family members don't unleash rapists on one another just because a plurality voted the wrong way and the majority failed to unite against them. Enemies do that. The migrants are clearly dangerous. Detaining them securely until they are expelled should be the only moral priority. Politicking with rape and murder is inherently evil. When Jesus Christ says do not resist evil, he means do not, by resisting an evil, turn yourself into that same evil. Do not let your righteous resistance to the migrant invasion warp your morality. Rape and murder by migrants are avoidable evils that should not be inflicted on your countrymen, who will always be your extended family. Zia will say otherwise to you, because he is not of your family. Keir Starmer will say otherwise to you, because he hates you. Listen to those who love you. Do not hate one another. Or at the very least do not use foreign rapists as weapons against each other.
Carl Benjamin 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿@Sargon_of_Akkad

It should really go without saying that punitive partisan policies that target sections of the electorate for voting in the "wrong" way is distinctly un-British and, frankly, shameful. Threatening sections of the electorate with punishment, in the form of placing dangerous migrant camps in their midst, might seem like a clever strategy on the surface, but it attacks something foundational concealed beneath our politics and is deeply unwise. We are a nation and, as Edmund Burke argued, have shared national interests that go beyond our provincial concerns. These interests go beyond the mere material. The unspoken assumption of Britain is that, despite any political divides, we are British and therefore will treat one another in a manner that recognises the fundamental legitimacy of the other person and their claim to a decent life. Regardless of disputes, they ought to be able to go about their day comfortably and safe in the knowledge that this is their country and they belong to it. This is the psychic fabric that itself has been damaged by mass immigration: bringing in millions of people from countries who do not have this special attitude is what brings about the intangible feeling of unease that causes "white flight". It's why the country feels less safe, whether or not it actually is, and why people wish to live among people like themselves. The world becomes predictable and you can feel at your ease that tomorrow will be like today, and today will be like yesterday. Carving up areas of the country into ideological chunks that can be dealt a cruel hand because of their voting record is the hard edge of politics that we really must avoid. Ideology turns countrymen into enemies, brother against brother, over ephermeral abstractions that have devastating and permanent consequences. The ideological politics of the Blair era is what brought these problems to our doors in the first place. It was understood by them that "rubbing the right's nose in diversity" was a punishment, to be weaponised against their enemies. The logical conclusion of this was Zack Polanski's building a society without the right entirely. The Green-voting areas targeted by Reform are well-to-do white areas of the country, who have not yet had to live with the consequences of their politics. This is the axel around which the emotional impact of the policy hinges, and reveals the horror of what Reform plan to do. Yes, they're stupid, but they are going to be like babes in the woods in the face of it. Reform have taken up the destructive politics of ideology from the other direction, and if we look at what it has brought into existence without the mystifying lens of political ideology, it seems monstrous. In concrete terms, what we are seeing is a Muslim man who is threatening British men, women, and children with the rapes and murders caused by unvetted illegals co-religionists in order to gain political power. Why should we think he would stop there? Such behaviour ought not to be rewarded. This kind of ideological politics is completely alien to British life, and very foreign way of approaching the political dispensation of the country. It is a direct attack on the psychic fabric of the nation and renders us into two opposed and irreconcilable camps, where the human feeling that bound us together is severed. It also solidifies the control that ideology has over both sides: once one is attacked by the other, the victim will feel obliged to respond in kind. We must rise above this kind of politics before it destroys the precious metaphysical inheritence of the nation and forever drags us down into a place from which we cannot escape.

English
15
31
283
6.8K
Luke Roddis
Luke Roddis@roddis_·
@MingNoMerci @Sargon_of_Akkad If they're secure, then why would it matter where Reform put the facilities? And surely putting them in Green strongholds would mean it would be a lot easier for them to protest outside the facility, and get an army of human rights lawyers to work on behalf of the migrants?
English
1
0
1
20
MercilessMong
MercilessMong@MingNoMerci·
“In concrete terms, what we are seeing is a Muslim man who is threatening British men, women, and children with the rapes and murders caused by unvetted illegals co-religionists in order to gain political power.” Guess you didn’t read the part about them being secure facilities.
English
2
0
33
724
Luke Roddis retweetledi
Carl Benjamin 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
It should really go without saying that punitive partisan policies that target sections of the electorate for voting in the "wrong" way is distinctly un-British and, frankly, shameful. Threatening sections of the electorate with punishment, in the form of placing dangerous migrant camps in their midst, might seem like a clever strategy on the surface, but it attacks something foundational concealed beneath our politics and is deeply unwise. We are a nation and, as Edmund Burke argued, have shared national interests that go beyond our provincial concerns. These interests go beyond the mere material. The unspoken assumption of Britain is that, despite any political divides, we are British and therefore will treat one another in a manner that recognises the fundamental legitimacy of the other person and their claim to a decent life. Regardless of disputes, they ought to be able to go about their day comfortably and safe in the knowledge that this is their country and they belong to it. This is the psychic fabric that itself has been damaged by mass immigration: bringing in millions of people from countries who do not have this special attitude is what brings about the intangible feeling of unease that causes "white flight". It's why the country feels less safe, whether or not it actually is, and why people wish to live among people like themselves. The world becomes predictable and you can feel at your ease that tomorrow will be like today, and today will be like yesterday. Carving up areas of the country into ideological chunks that can be dealt a cruel hand because of their voting record is the hard edge of politics that we really must avoid. Ideology turns countrymen into enemies, brother against brother, over ephermeral abstractions that have devastating and permanent consequences. The ideological politics of the Blair era is what brought these problems to our doors in the first place. It was understood by them that "rubbing the right's nose in diversity" was a punishment, to be weaponised against their enemies. The logical conclusion of this was Zack Polanski's building a society without the right entirely. The Green-voting areas targeted by Reform are well-to-do white areas of the country, who have not yet had to live with the consequences of their politics. This is the axel around which the emotional impact of the policy hinges, and reveals the horror of what Reform plan to do. Yes, they're stupid, but they are going to be like babes in the woods in the face of it. Reform have taken up the destructive politics of ideology from the other direction, and if we look at what it has brought into existence without the mystifying lens of political ideology, it seems monstrous. In concrete terms, what we are seeing is a Muslim man who is threatening British men, women, and children with the rapes and murders caused by unvetted illegals co-religionists in order to gain political power. Why should we think he would stop there? Such behaviour ought not to be rewarded. This kind of ideological politics is completely alien to British life, and very foreign way of approaching the political dispensation of the country. It is a direct attack on the psychic fabric of the nation and renders us into two opposed and irreconcilable camps, where the human feeling that bound us together is severed. It also solidifies the control that ideology has over both sides: once one is attacked by the other, the victim will feel obliged to respond in kind. We must rise above this kind of politics before it destroys the precious metaphysical inheritence of the nation and forever drags us down into a place from which we cannot escape.
English
290
115
933
59.4K
Luke Roddis
Luke Roddis@roddis_·
@orm0nde Rarely want to leap to the defence of the Greens but I hate this vindictive politics; you can easily see this expanding to 'Vote for us and get 10% more council funding, don't vote for us and get 10% less'. It pits districts against each other
Luke Roddis tweet media
English
2
0
28
953
Luke Roddis
Luke Roddis@roddis_·
@Landeur Honestly I'm not even sure how effective it would be, some people can hold the belief "Refugees welcome, just not where I live" and cannot fathom that most people also don't want them nearby and ergo there is nowhere to put them
English
1
0
1
587
Luke Roddis
Luke Roddis@roddis_·
@GBPolitcs @DailyMail It's a trap, if you accept the invite they will cancel at the last minute so they can virtue signal about how they stopped the far right. But if you reject the invitation they will call you a coward for not debating them
English
3
1
60
3.6K
GB Politics
GB Politics@GBPolitcs·
🚨NEW: Tommy Robinson has been booked by the Oxford Union to speak at a debate on Islam [@DailyMail]
English
168
263
5.1K
233.2K
Luke Roddis
Luke Roddis@roddis_·
@dailystoic This is horrifically embarrassing, surprised it's not deleted yet
English
0
0
0
40
Daily Stoic
Daily Stoic@dailystoic·
Ryan Holiday's Response to Ivanka Trump
English
1.4K
131
1.6K
2.2M
Luke Roddis
Luke Roddis@roddis_·
@RusGarbageHuman Nah, in the hierarchy of oppressed minorities, in the eyes of the government Muslims are still very much placed above Jews. All that'll be done is more security for Jewish people from taxpayer expense, and more head burying in the sand
English
0
0
0
165
Russian Garbage Human
Russian Garbage Human@RusGarbageHuman·
If the Southport attack took place in a Jewish school for girls, our government would've deported every muslim by now.
Big Mayo@Big_Mayo_

English
7
54
818
7.3K
Luke Roddis retweetledi
The Spectator
The Spectator@spectator·
Hey, Jews – have you ever considered the possibility that you’re making a fuss over nothing? That a few petrol bombs through the windows of your synagogues is not really a big deal? That’s what I heard when Zack Polanski wondered out loud this week if Britain’s Jews are experiencing ‘actual unsafety’ or just a ‘perception of unsafety’. It is one of the most tone-deaf, pitiless sentences I have heard a politician utter. ✍️ Brendan O’Neill Article | spectator.com/article/is-zac…
English
358
913
3.6K
109.1K
Luke Roddis
Luke Roddis@roddis_·
@JoshFerme I'm just looking forward to the TV depiction of this incident where instead it's a white man radicalised by posting on X
English
0
0
2
80
Luke Roddis
Luke Roddis@roddis_·
@Landeur That's probably the most exercise he's ever done
English
0
0
6
426
Luke Roddis
Luke Roddis@roddis_·
@Landeur The implication being we can't ever vote for anything fresh and different, just vote for uniparty in perpetuity. What's the point in voting then
English
0
0
2
174
Luke Roddis
Luke Roddis@roddis_·
@ASI Can someone teach our Chancellor of the Exchequer about this concept known as second-order effects
English
0
0
0
25
Luke Roddis
Luke Roddis@roddis_·
@orm0nde Reform are just upset they didn't get to appropriate him first
English
0
0
2
143
Luke Roddis
Luke Roddis@roddis_·
Every day is filled with dozens of micro-decisions about what food to eat, and whether to exercise. Of course modernity doesn't make it easy, but everyone still has the agency to make positive decisions regarding health that pays dividends in the long run. Claiming ignorance or blaming others no longer flies and just reveals a lack of moral character bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…
English
0
0
0
18