Rogan

>having intermittent internet outages >ask claude to build me a network monitor >claude suggests a TUI >"ok, but keep it simple. lean and mean." >"Don't worry sir! It's a good TUI." >see "npm install..." flash on the screen >look inside >it's react. mfw

@uubzu @TheTrueBudman Yeah, that's fair. I think you're right but I would prefer wording like "each one inside the next". Maybe I'll try the original wording out some older people and see what they do.

@rogandb @TheTrueBudman You injected “with” and removed the comma, which changes the semantics (it makes it nonsensical) The part after the comma is describing the relationship between blocks in the stack

I’m not being facetious when I say that I doubt more than half of the American electorate could pass this literacy test, not if you have to get it perfect What do you think

@uubzu @TheTrueBudman "Stack 3 blocks with one on top of the other" ??

@TheTrueBudman “Stack these four blocks, one atop the other” No logic error

@fancierdoves @ChrisLandauUSA Post your feet

@rogandb @ChrisLandauUSA Post your hands

Last fall, as my 86-year-old father-in-law lay dying of cancer at his home in Lakeland, Florida, the pool guy told my wife—who was tending to her dad—that he was owed $2,000 for past services. He claimed that he’d left my father-in-law’s check “out in the rain” and it had been ruined. Although distraught over her father’s situation, my wife is a sensible person and asked to see the “ruined” check before writing a new one. Weeks pass, and the pool guy starts to get pretty aggressive about demanding payment, before he finally produces the “ruined” check on which he also claims to have spilled ink (!)—and shows her many other similarly “ruined” checks. My wife logs into her father’s bank account and sees that the check—in perfect condition—had been cashed by the pool guy months earlier. So he’s obviously trying to take advantage of her vulnerable situation to scam her. We were outraged and concerned that he’d pull this stunt on others, so we immediately contacted the Polk County Sheriff’s Department. We were assigned a Detective to whom we presented the evidence: emails demanding payment, the copy of the bogus “ruined” check, and the bank’s copy of the intact check that was cashed. Alas, they’ve now ghosted us since we last reached out 3 months ago asking for an update. And that brings me to my point: I don’t know what’s happened in our country, but our law enforcement agencies and prosecutors seem more interested in doing their paperwork than in actually enforcing the law. I hope we can change this before people stop bothering even to bring wrongdoing to the authorities’ attention, as has happened in many other countries. The rule of law requires enforcement of the law!

@Raven_Of_Hope @ChrisLandauUSA Yes, good question.

@ChrisLandauUSA @rogandb Why are the Memo Lines different

@Awoken_American @ChrisLandauUSA State your purpose.

@rogandb @ChrisLandauUSA idk man. Ask the 38 people who understood.

@allgarbled I think it's more like: "models associate bad input with bad output" but I have difficulty anthropomorphizing llms at this stage in their development. Either way, I agree.

I think you get worse results from LLMs if your messages are full of typos and grammatical mistakes. I’m sure this would not show up in benchmarks, but I still believe it. The models respect you less and become lazier as a result.

@TheTacoKing2 @ChrisLandauUSA Why didn't he black them out?

@rogandb @ChrisLandauUSA You absolute fucking idiot

@MarkinWC @ChrisLandauUSA Hey there. Not much. How about you?

@rogandb @ChrisLandauUSA What is wrong with you, Rogan?

@01Eden08 @ChrisLandauUSA Yeah, I'm not advocating for that

@rogandb @ChrisLandauUSA Why would he willingly release address and bank account number on the Internet lmao

@flynnlikeeagles @ChrisLandauUSA That's pretty mean. I would hope you would attack the substance of what I'm saying rather than me personally.

@rogandb @ChrisLandauUSA Do you know that your not very smart?

@Centerfield12 @ChrisLandauUSA How did he do it? Do you know?

@rogandb @ChrisLandauUSA Because it’s just as easy to do what he did?? Why is the method of obscuring information your focus of this post?

@Centerfield12 @ChrisLandauUSA Yes. I'm obviously questioning the legitimacy of his claim. I saw a red flag. I see a lot of fake posts on the internet. *Shrug*

@ericntyler @ChrisLandauUSA Karen's are not elected. Some Karens are born Karens. For others, Karenhood is thrusted upon them.

@rogandb @ChrisLandauUSA Who voted you male Karen?

@JoshWeber2 @ChrisLandauUSA He can't afford me.

@rogandb @ChrisLandauUSA Maybe next time he should submit it all to you beforehand to make sure it meets your standards.

@danbarker @ChrisLandauUSA Yes, I just find this way odd because it makes the images look ai generated and fake.

@rogandb @ChrisLandauUSA because different humans do things in slightly different ways. the way you do things may be different to the way other people do them.

@MrTubbsCousin @ChrisLandauUSA I'm suggesting a more effective method of redaction.

@rogandb @ChrisLandauUSA To keep someone like you from getting that information.

@BenjaminJeorge @ChrisLandauUSA What's your best guess for the tool he used to do that?

@rogandb @ChrisLandauUSA Just FYI. You realize there are apps that do what he did for free. Also there are multiple way of censoring. Not every thing has to be blacked out.

@skavenslave @ChrisLandauUSA It is for jpegs. This is not a PDF.

@rogandb @ChrisLandauUSA Because blackout is not an effective counter measure.

@analophigus7 @ChrisLandauUSA That was because the documents had layers. Jpegs don't have layers. I'm struggling to understand why this approach was the one he took because it seems both more difficult and more suspisious.

@rogandb @ChrisLandauUSA Because the DOJ already tried that with the Epstein files and keyboard warriors figured out how to bypass those redactions in 24 hrs (and of course I'm happier for it, just saying)

@Awoken_American @ChrisLandauUSA ??

@rogandb @ChrisLandauUSA You're retarded. Thanks for playing.