Monsieur Ron DeVous III😷

As we learn Ann’s murder WAS politically motivated, The Times has revealed the scale of the threat to Nigel’s life. Nigel has received 1,577 threats since February this year. Including 597 death threats. The most persistent individual targeting Farage sent 6 directed threats to him on Facebook between June 24 and July 6, including a message telling him to “get the f*** out of Wales before I just kill Nigel Farage … you can die at any f***ing moment.” Another individual posted on X last month saying: “Execute the striking Traitor Nigel Farage. TODAY,” followed by two further escalating posts within eight hours. A third individual wrote on X: “Can someone shoot Nigel Farage? Make him a self-fulfilling prophecy?” All the ‘journalists’ and MPs who attack him for accepting a gift to fund his security should hang their heads in shame. The government still provides him with no security. They did for a short while after the general election. Then - astonishingly - they cut it by 75% within weeks of the assassination of Charlie Kirk and sent David Lammy out to say Nigel “flirted with the Hitler Youth”. Reform stepped in to provide him with a detail of the original size, appropriate to the enormous threat. The establishment doesn’t want Nigel to have the required security for a reason. They incite violence against him for a reason. It’s exactly what it looks like.

A class of children cheering for England in Lancashire - the woke looney left box ticking brigade clearly hasn’t reached that part of the country yet! 😬 Lovely to see & good for those kids that they’ve got teachers that still love ❤️ our flag! 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

Harvey, You pled guilty to paying a 17 year old boy for sex. When you were 39. This is “disgrace”. Given you claim to have “nothing to apologise for” I feel compelled to inform you:  *this conduct is still illegal today*. You went to your party’s client press to condemn Nigel - who was also grieving for Ann - for asking questions that are now totally vindicated.  All to score a cheap party political point. This is “depraved”.

Since it seems you’re either intentionally obtuse, or so deep inside the establishment bubble you can’t tell up from down, let me define what I mean by “the establishment.” The establishment isn’t defined by wealth, success, private schools or impressive careers. If it were, every entrepreneur, footballer, celebrity and business owner would be part of it. They aren’t. The establishment is the network of politicians, senior civil servants, quangos, regulators, publicly funded institutions and influential media figures with direct access to the levers of power. They write the laws, allocate public money, shape policy, influence the institutions that govern our lives and have enormous influence over what is treated as respectable or beyond the pale in public debate. Their worldview is formed largely within the same political, institutional and media circles. Ideas are reinforced by one another rather than tested against the experience of the people they govern.When outsiders challenge that consensus, they aren’t just opposed, they’re discredited by the political, institutional and media networks that protect the system. Membership isn’t earned with an Oxford degree, a banking career or a successful business. It’s earned by serving and perpetuating the system. Which brings me to The Times. It suggests I’m somehow part of the establishment because I went to the Lycée Français and became a Senior prosecutor. That’s a category error. I’ve never written Britain’s laws, run a government department, controlled public spending or shaped the political consensus. My education and career don’t make me part of the establishment any more than they make me Prime Minister. They’re confusing personal achievement with institutional power. The same applies to Nigel Farage. For decades he has challenged the political consensus that has dominated Westminster. While the establishment was running the country, he was campaigning against the direction it was taking. That’s precisely why so much of the political, institutional and media class has spent decades trying to ridicule him, discredit him and paint him as the villain. Not because he’s part of their system, but because he has consistently challenged it. That’s what the establishment is. It isn’t a social class. It isn’t a school. It isn’t a bank balance. It’s defined by what you protect: a self-serving system that puts preserving its own power ahead of serving the people it exists to represent.

🚨 BREAKING: Shabana Mahmood offers Nigel Farage a meeting with the Home Office to discuss security measures for him and "those in public life"