RoyalSun

A final-year law student, Rishi Kumar from Tamil Nadu National Law University, refuses to delete his blog criticising the Supreme Court… despite pressure from his own university. Why? Because the administration allegedly received calls from advocates, judges, and others claiming the post harms the institution’s “reputation.” The blog titled “The Supreme Court of India Has No Spine” questioned the court’s decision to ban an NCERT textbook chapter on judicial corruption. But here’s the real issue: A law student is being told to silence himself… for expressing a legal opinion. His response? Clear and powerful: “My opinions are mine… you do not own my voice or my conscience.” He even said he’s ready to face disciplinary action rather than back down. This isn’t just about one blog. This is about academic freedom vs institutional pressure. If law students… the future of the judiciary are discouraged from questioning the system, then who exactly is allowed to question it? Criticism of institutions ≠ disrespect. Silencing criticism = weakening democracy.

There are still gaps in employment generation and industrial growth. There is also concern over the lack of improvement in the lives of people in rural areas - M Velmurugan, a resident of Sivakasi

What pressure. These companies and the government have extracted very high profits when the crude prices have been so low over the years, transferring not even a paisa of benefit to the consumer. Time to pay that back to the consumer now.

Ask no questions to the government, and you’ll get queues as answers.