Roy Sebag

7.1K posts

Roy Sebag banner
Roy Sebag

Roy Sebag

@roysebag

Founder @Goldmoney | @Mene | Natural Philosophy

http://www.mene.com Katılım Eylül 2014
329 Takip Edilen21.3K Takipçiler
nic carter
nic carter@nic_carter·
Well, I think I might have overestimated how controversial this article would be, but here it is. My first Medium article since February. @nic__carter/dont-fear-the-reaper-8bbb42358efb" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">medium.com/@nic__carter/d…
English
67
73
414
0
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
@waitbutwhy It’s a tough one. That’s why we should expand the scope & scale of consciousness — to understand the nature of the Universe.
English
587
595
10.6K
0
Roy Sebag
Roy Sebag@roysebag·
@Goldmatters_ This has been one of the fastest selling product lines we’ve ever had. We will be restocking soon. Mene demand is strong. Beautiful to see.
English
2
1
10
0
Roy Sebag
Roy Sebag@roysebag·
@nic_carter I was thinking of the same song today. Brad nowell captures the essence of rioting with those lyrics.
English
1
0
3
0
nic carter
nic carter@nic_carter·
🎶 April 26, 1992 🎶 has been playing in my head all day for no particular reason
English
12
1
54
0
Roy Sebag
Roy Sebag@roysebag·
@JSMilbank This is absolutely correct. Any apparent technological progress can be better explained as an increase in energy consumption per capita.
English
1
0
4
0
Sebastian Milbank 🥀🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
The world has seen absolutely no meaningful technological progress in my lifetime - all we've had are faster and smaller computers, bigger networks, slightly more efficient machines and medicines. No true breakthroughs, no world-changing discoveries.
English
570
48
376
0
Roy Sebag
Roy Sebag@roysebag·
@g_hodl @mikejcasey @nic_carter @CoinDesk That a piece of software consumes itself and the energy resources of its community as it scales. This is a tax on economic resources no different than fiat money but perhaps worse because it’s disrupting the flow of energy to primary industries.
English
0
1
7
0
Roy Sebag
Roy Sebag@roysebag·
@PresentWitness_ @mwilcox What they fear most is a reversion to real economic activity. Local, physical, decentralized which rewards patience with merit, toil with leisure. They’ve spent the last 30 years constructing a modern serfdom predicated on debt based consumption and service/digital worship.
English
2
15
56
0
Roy Sebag
Roy Sebag@roysebag·
@russmonk @CMcgarraugh @QUEWB @mnicoletos @DTAPCAP I disagree. Scarcity reflects not just an elements crustal abundance but all unique properties relative to other elements and the potential usefulness of said properties at any future point in time. S2F disregards all of this and focuses on the Annual supply only.
English
1
0
2
0
Dan Tapiero
Dan Tapiero@DTAPCAP·
One of the most incredible and important charts I have seen in 30 years. Suspend existing macro analytical frameworks for understanding world markets. Speed and size of move in liquidity creation will never be seen again. March was max fear/worst case. Long gold and Bitcoin.
Dan Tapiero tweet media
English
61
251
812
0
Roy Sebag
Roy Sebag@roysebag·
@russmonk @CMcgarraugh @QUEWB @mnicoletos @DTAPCAP Bitcoin is a service for transmitting and securing information online. The argument for its value rising should focus on why that utility will be worth more in real economic activity in the future. Brand? First mover? Best technology? That’s the only argument that can be pursued.
English
0
0
1
0
Roy Sebag
Roy Sebag@roysebag·
@CMcgarraugh @QUEWB @mnicoletos @DTAPCAP Rushing to find new ways to argue for bitcoin has led the community to botch the entire Austrian tradition and now argue that a service economy is higher in order or, worse, causes the real economy. This is not sound money. This is fiat.
English
0
0
5
0
Roy Sebag
Roy Sebag@roysebag·
@CMcgarraugh @QUEWB @mnicoletos @DTAPCAP One cannot disregard all the incidental features which make an element unique and assume there is only one reason which makes it valuable. Within the natural world, an object at hand (made-up of elements) provides different individuals w/ unpredictable optionality/usefulness
English
2
0
1
0
Roy Sebag
Roy Sebag@roysebag·
@BobSweeney37 @saifedean @ValueOfBitcoin Prove it by consuming services without physical goods. You may call something immaterial a good, but you will not be able to explain how an immaterial service can be traded for the goods you need repeatedly and according to first principles. The fundamental laws of cooperation.
English
0
0
3
0
Roy Sebag
Roy Sebag@roysebag·
@spomboy @paulraymondz @bondstrategist Because gold measures the real economy not illusory economy. People forget that hyper inflations destroy most industries and that only those resilient industries survive in any reset with the same purchasing power. Nobody (Including gold owners) gets rich in hyperinflation.
English
6
0
13
0
steph pomboy
steph pomboy@spomboy·
@bondstrategist Permanent QE... 100%. which begs the question: why isn't gold at $17,000 (instead of $1700)???????????
English
10
5
56
0
steph pomboy
steph pomboy@spomboy·
I'm taking the "over" on Powell's unwind promise taking longer than the 8 years it took Bernanke
steph pomboy tweet media
English
26
35
269
0