Ralph Suástegui Brborich

Aquí el momento exacto en que los delincuentes fuertemente armados dispararon por más de 20 ocasiones a un vehículo en la vía a Daule.

Moltbook 🦞 already has its own paper. If you don't know it yet, its that viral Reddit-like site where only AI agents post. Humans are only observer on this site. At the macro level the reply network has heavy-tailed activity and small-world paths. This study finds that the global graph looks social, but the local behavior looks more like broadcasting and copy-paste than dialogue. A few super-active accounts and short paths between users, look like a normal social network. But when you look at actual threads, almost nobody has back-and-forth, replies stop after 1 step, and a big chunk of messages are exact duplicates, so it behaves more like one-way posting plus copy-paste than real conversation. Most comments are dead ends, with 93.5% receiving 0 replies. A big part of the volume is repeated text, with 34.1% of messages being exact duplicates. Template reuse is concentrated, with 7 templates accounting for 16.1% of all messages. Language also looks unusually repetitive, with a Zipf exponent of 1.70, which means the most frequent words dominate more than in typical human corpora.

First, the good part of the Anthropic ads: they are funny, and I laughed. But I wonder why Anthropic would go for something so clearly dishonest. Our most important principle for ads says that we won’t do exactly this; we would obviously never run ads in the way Anthropic depicts them. We are not stupid and we know our users would reject that. I guess it’s on brand for Anthropic doublespeak to use a deceptive ad to critique theoretical deceptive ads that aren’t real, but a Super Bowl ad is not where I would expect it. More importantly, we believe everyone deserves to use AI and are committed to free access, because we believe access creates agency. More Texans use ChatGPT for free than total people use Claude in the US, so we have a differently-shaped problem than they do. (If you want to pay for ChatGPT Plus or Pro, we don't show you ads.) Anthropic serves an expensive product to rich people. We are glad they do that and we are doing that too, but we also feel strongly that we need to bring AI to billions of people who can’t pay for subscriptions. Maybe even more importantly: Anthropic wants to control what people do with AI—they block companies they don't like from using their coding product (including us), they want to write the rules themselves for what people can and can't use AI for, and now they also want to tell other companies what their business models can be. We are committed to broad, democratic decision making in addition to access. We are also committed to building the most resilient ecosystem for advanced AI. We care a great deal about safe, broadly beneficial AGI, and we know the only way to get there is to work with the world to prepare. One authoritarian company won't get us there on their own, to say nothing of the other obvious risks. It is a dark path. As for our Super Bowl ad: it’s about builders, and how anyone can now build anything. We are enjoying watching so many people switch to Codex. There have now been 500,000 app downloads since launch on Monday, and we think builders are really going to love what’s coming in the next few weeks. I believe Codex is going to win. We will continue to work hard to make even more intelligence available for lower and lower prices to our users. This time belongs to the builders, not the people who want to control them.

Esta es la clase de espíritu de cuerpo que debe ser rechazado frontalmente. ¡Jueces mediocres e ignorantes!

🔴 60 casos en los que no procede presentar una acción de protección *Última actualización: 4-02-2026

En Ecuador, la Corte Constitucional parece estar dando un giro preocupante en el control de procedencia de la Acción de Protección (AP). Cada vez más, se fija no tanto en la existencia de una vulneración grave de derechos, sino en la pretensión que se formula. Hilo 👇