Russell Robertson Abaxx CBDO
48 posts

Russell Robertson Abaxx CBDO
@ru55rob
Developing the next generation of derivative market solutions


















Been having some very interesting institutional investor meetings after this report — as has the analyst, from my understanding — especially after calling out that $2,500 per share blue sky number (kudos to the analyst on that btw, having been in a similar seat I know it takes guts to put that in writing). Given the conversations, I’ll spend more time on valuation and the way we think about growth and ‘spendvesting’ allocations on the next call. But a few thoughts on the subject (and please, this is ALL subject to risk causations, forward looking statements, analyst disclosures, etc….we are world-builders-or-bust from the beginning, allocate appropriately, big problems trying to solve, big risk/big potential reward, baja racer emotions till we cross the line, etc): 1) Start with the core signal, there are tons of moving parts, but focus on three basic questions as a foundation: a) Is the business model proven and sound, does management have the experience to execute: obvious yes (and I’ll add that we put together the best global team in commodity market building, we ARE the global-A team even compared to companies 50-100x bigger that we will compete with imo) b) Is Singapore an important emerging global gold hub (especially given geopolitics across rivals NY, Shanghai, Dubai, etc)? Is Abaxx the only futures market, spot market, and most advanced HQLA tech vision? Yup. Ours to lose. Next question. c) Now to the stage-1 flagship, is there an LNG price/benchmark everyone trades on as a standard, or is it up for grabs and what are the alternatives to Abaxx now that its already showing liquidity? …no agreed price, and HHub is not LNG, TTF is not LNG, and billions of people are not going to price their core energy on a reporter surgery of limited information participation…and China doesn’t recognize the ‘Japan Korea’ survey, they are very astute about building new commodity markets — unlike the overly bureaucratic and overly financialized “west” IMO (Abaxx now has much greater than 50% of “winning this estimated $5B asset” imo, and we hope to put the nails in that coffee within the next 12mo). There, forward risk-adjusted valuation justified. Done. Nothing is certain. You want certainty and lower mark to market draw down risk while you manage OPM, buy a bond or an index. You want risk adjusted return, a team hell bent on providing solutions to some of the world biggest challenges, with the best teams to do so, join us. We were “too expensive” for a lot of the street as an “idea” at ~$200mm pre rev (~$12), even though we could have sold our infra for more than that, it was the stupidest asymmetric option in the market and I wasn’t afraid to say it. For those who think $50/$60 is too expensive until we fully prove out benchmark status, just test out how little is for sale between $60 and that $100 price target, because the real money (large and small) that owns this asymmetric option are comfortable with any [hedge-fund driven] draw downs and IMO not willing to sell (just on business model stage 1, and i don’t intend to give up or lose on the larger business model stage 2 that I founded this company on either). $ABXX #29ers #NowWeScale #LetsGetPhysical #MayDay
























