Ryan Finlay

5.7K posts

Ryan Finlay banner
Ryan Finlay

Ryan Finlay

@ryanfinlay

Dad. Working on tech projects with my 6 kids. #Bitcoin nostr:#npub1w9fty2lc7szxphqm78rhwvtal8pj6xt5mukdmdcpyg6tnf9ksfwquqzy6t

Oregon Katılım Nisan 2009
439 Takip Edilen1.2K Takipçiler
Ryan Finlay retweetledi
Martin Skold
Martin Skold@MartinSkold2·
@sabrdance Oh - I agree - I think we Leeroy Jenkinsed it - first by showing up at all and then by Bibi initiating. There’s been talk for some time of China and the BRICS ushering in a new currency order on their timetable - this speeds that up but still hands them the controls.
English
0
3
8
924
🏔Adam🏔
🏔Adam🏔@denverbitcoin·
I’ll send 100k sats ($70) to anyone who can guess the correct number of giraffe 🦒 in this pic 👇
🏔Adam🏔 tweet media
English
48
1
9
3K
Ryan Finlay
Ryan Finlay@ryanfinlay·
Balaji@balajis

I'm going to make some obvious points. (1) Blowing up all the oil infrastructure in the Middle East is an insane idea, and may well result in a global economic crash and humanitarian crisis unrivaled in the lives of those now living. We're talking about the price of everything everywhere rising, from food to gas, at a moment when inflation was already high. All of that will be laid at the feet of the authors of this war. (2) The antebellum status quo of Feb 27, 2026 was just not that bad, but we're unlikely to return to it. Expect indefinite, long-term, ongoing disruptions to everything out of the Middle East. (3) Also assume tech financing crashes for the indefinite future. The genius plan to get the Gulf states caught in the crossfire has incinerated much of the funding for LPs, for datacenters, and for IPOs. Anyone in tech who supported this war may soon learn the meaning of "force majeure" as funding gets yanked. (4) Many capital allocators will instead be allocating much further down Maslow's hierarchy of needs, towards useful basic things like food and energy. (5) It's fortunate that all those progressives yelled about the "climate crisis." Yes, their reasoning about timelines was wrong, and much of the money was wasted in graft, but the result was right: we all need energy independence from the Middle East, pronto. It's also fortunate that Elon and China autistically took climate seriously. Now they're going to need to ship a billion solar panels, electric vehicles, batteries, nuclear power plants, and the like to get everyone off oil, immediately. (6) It's not just an oil and gas problem, of course. It's also a fertilizer problem, and a chemical precursor problem. Maybe some new sources will come online at the new prices, but it takes time to dial stuff up, particularly at this scale, so shortages are almost a certainty. That said, China has actually scaled up coal-to-chemicals[a,c] (C2C), and there's also something more sci-fi called Power-to-X[b] which turns arbitrary power + water + air into hydrocarbons. But all of that will need to get accelerated. I have a background in chemical engineering so may start funding things in this area. (7) Ultimately, this war is going to result in tremendous blame for anyone associated with it. It's a no-win scenario to blow up this much infrastructure for so many people. Simply not worth it for whatever objective they thought they were going to attain. But unless you're actually in a position to stop the madness, the pragmatic thing to do is: scramble to mitigate the fallout to yourself, your business, and your people. [a]: reuters.com/business/energ… [b]: alfalaval.com/industries/ene… [c]: reuters.com/sustainability…

English
0
0
1
46
Stephen Wolfe
Stephen Wolfe@PerfInjust·
The only possible way for the Iran War to be a "win" for the US is if it ends in regime change. If the US ends the war and the regime remains (and maintains control over the Strait of Hormuz), Iran will declare victory, and every US partner in the ME will see it that way. The US achieves nothing in its own interest and worsens its economic conditions, while oil continues to flow to China and Russia. The only "win" would be a ground war to overthrow the regime. But a ground war is not a win; it would be disastrous. To my mind, the US cannot win in any likely scenario.
English
55
35
578
37.5K
Ryan Finlay
Ryan Finlay@ryanfinlay·
“It's a no-win scenario to blow up this much infrastructure for so many people.”
Balaji@balajis

I'm going to make some obvious points. (1) Blowing up all the oil infrastructure in the Middle East is an insane idea, and may well result in a global economic crash and humanitarian crisis unrivaled in the lives of those now living. We're talking about the price of everything everywhere rising, from food to gas, at a moment when inflation was already high. All of that will be laid at the feet of the authors of this war. (2) The antebellum status quo of Feb 27, 2026 was just not that bad, but we're unlikely to return to it. Expect indefinite, long-term, ongoing disruptions to everything out of the Middle East. (3) Also assume tech financing crashes for the indefinite future. The genius plan to get the Gulf states caught in the crossfire has incinerated much of the funding for LPs, for datacenters, and for IPOs. Anyone in tech who supported this war may soon learn the meaning of "force majeure" as funding gets yanked. (4) Many capital allocators will instead be allocating much further down Maslow's hierarchy of needs, towards useful basic things like food and energy. (5) It's fortunate that all those progressives yelled about the "climate crisis." Yes, their reasoning about timelines was wrong, and much of the money was wasted in graft, but the result was right: we all need energy independence from the Middle East, pronto. It's also fortunate that Elon and China autistically took climate seriously. Now they're going to need to ship a billion solar panels, electric vehicles, batteries, nuclear power plants, and the like to get everyone off oil, immediately. (6) It's not just an oil and gas problem, of course. It's also a fertilizer problem, and a chemical precursor problem. Maybe some new sources will come online at the new prices, but it takes time to dial stuff up, particularly at this scale, so shortages are almost a certainty. That said, China has actually scaled up coal-to-chemicals[a,c] (C2C), and there's also something more sci-fi called Power-to-X[b] which turns arbitrary power + water + air into hydrocarbons. But all of that will need to get accelerated. I have a background in chemical engineering so may start funding things in this area. (7) Ultimately, this war is going to result in tremendous blame for anyone associated with it. It's a no-win scenario to blow up this much infrastructure for so many people. Simply not worth it for whatever objective they thought they were going to attain. But unless you're actually in a position to stop the madness, the pragmatic thing to do is: scramble to mitigate the fallout to yourself, your business, and your people. [a]: reuters.com/business/energ… [b]: alfalaval.com/industries/ene… [c]: reuters.com/sustainability…

English
0
0
1
128
Ryan Finlay retweetledi
Joe Kent
Joe Kent@joekent16jan19·
After much reflection, I have decided to resign from my position as Director of the National Counterterrorism Center, effective today. I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran. Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation, and it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby. It has been an honor serving under @POTUS and @DNIGabbard and leading the professionals at NCTC. May God bless America.
Joe Kent tweet media
English
72.9K
219.9K
847.7K
99.8M
Ryan Finlay
Ryan Finlay@ryanfinlay·
Nobody is going to join the US in the strait of hormuz, everyone said no and for good reason. It’s a total un-winnable death trap. The war not going well and not as planned is an enormous understatement. Here’s what I think will happen next. The president has asked allies for help and they said no. I think he will use this as the exit. If they aren’t willing to “do the work, we aren’t risking more American lives”. I think this will be the end of US bases in the middle east and Iran has already required it to open up the strait. Like I said the other day, I think this is the end of the petrodollar and American hegemony. The global order will not be held together by the US military, the US dollar, and the current US ideology we force on other countries. We are going to move into a multipolar world that is more fragmented. This is kind of the end of “the global village”. The strait not being open doesn’t just just impact oil prices, more importantly it disrupts fertilizer from making it to farmers in time for spring crops. The consequences are mounting by the day. Also, I genuinely believe all this was inevitably going to happen at some point in the next 10-20 years, the events and choices of the past few weeks just sped them up.
English
0
0
2
66
Ryan Finlay
Ryan Finlay@ryanfinlay·
I believe the petrodollar might be dead. @balajis might be time for another thread of predictions?
English
0
0
5
527
Ryan Finlay
Ryan Finlay@ryanfinlay·
👀
John Ʌ Konrad V@johnkonrad

Not gonna sugar coat this and do not care if it costs me my new Pentagon press credentials and access to this administration. The left smeared my name in a major WAPO hit piece and the right can do the same. I’m a captain, I can live alone in the ocean. 👉 The Strait of Homuz is an epic failure. Today’s news, no escorts until late month, has ramifications few understand. US Merchant Marine ships have been attacked. This is not panickan. This is not a damnation of Trump. This is hard truth 👇 A GLOBALIST MOLE INSIDE THE ADMINISTRATION CAUSED THIS We entered this admin with a set of maritime appointments & prospective appointments not seen since FDR… possibly Teddy. DEEP knowledge of shipping & DEEP maritime support. So how did we get to the most important energy and food (1/3rd of all fertilizer) chokepoint in the world getting cut off? Well our Trump 1.0 appointees were globalist heavy hitters. Commerce secretary Wilbur Ross managed ships for the Rothchilds. Our DOT secretary Elaine Chao, is married to Mitch McConnell & heiress to a shipping fortune tied to China. We already know how tied to the globalist Mark Milley was and Pete Buttigieg was McKinsey. Trump knew this & formulated a team of the best maritime advisors ever seen. A Dream Team & I know because most are friends of mine. ALL BUT FOUR HAVE BEEN SNIPED Who remains? Trump himself is a strong supporter. Hegseth has focused more on naval and shipping that any DoD secretary this century. Elbridge Colby understands the critical importance of the maritime domain Russ Vought has pushed the Maritime Action But what do these four have in common? They are all at THE center of the bullseye from MSM and globalist attacks. And all are extremely busy with other things. ALL OTHER MEMBERS OF THE MARITIME DREAM TEAM HAVE BEEN SNIPED OR SIDELINED JD VANCE - has worked tirelessly behind the scenes as for shipping deals including icebreakers. Strangely silent lately. Charlie Kirk - Assasinated Mike Waltz - author of the SHIPs for America Act… pushed out of NSC Dan Caldwell - top OSD official escorted out of the pentagon Alex Wong - Under at NSC and now shipbuilding executive axed Bruce Kimbrell- organizer of the SHIPs act axed from NSC Ian Bennitt - NSC maritime head, gone along with his staff Jerry Hendrix - NSC shipbuilding, pushed to OMB Brent Sadler - the #1 maritime think tank strategist in the world, sniped nomination as Maritime Administrator Morgan Ortagus - right hand to Witkoff, killed by a smear campaign Kristi Noem - absolutely saved the US Coast Guard and delivered the winning blow to the UN Maritime arm in London Sean Plankey - USCG is the lead on ship protection and regulations. He was Noem’s right hand man for reforms. Gone alongside Noem. Lou Sola - Federal Maritime Commission Chairman who was investigating globalist control of trade Jon Harrison - the Navy Chief of Staff who focused on sealift and Merchant Marine, fired. Sal Mercogliano - nomination killed to be the US Merchant Marine’s top Admiral Ross Kennedy - moved out of Commerce John Mills - buried in a minor office at state And yes me. And that’s just the big names. So many others with deep maritime expertise have been hit by this organized political action campaign. The only very senior person who hasn’t was a senior executive at Maersk. You can call me a crazy conspiracy theorist, you can explain rational reasoning for each snipe, but collectively this is damning Who is behind this systematic sniping? Wish I knew. Rumors range from the Deputy National Security Adviser who took effective control of the NSC from Waltz… to shadow figures in London. The only people I am 💯 certain are not behind this are Hegseth and Trump himself because everyone I talk to reiterate their continued support. This is why the Strait of Hormuz has become a disaster… Trump set up a Dream Team to target globalist control of shipping and that expertise has been gutted.

ART
0
0
0
63
Jacob Posel
Jacob Posel@jacob_posel·
Where’s the best place to invest if I think we’re underestimating AI demand by about 10,000x
English
29
1
71
21.1K
Martin Skold
Martin Skold@MartinSkold2·
There’s a scenario where this doesn’t happen, where, after a debt jubilee, we retreat into ourselves, dig deep, and fund our own comeback essentially as we did in the early Republic. But the blue faction will have to be decisively rejected politically for that to happen - their preferred program has been to sell out and will continue to be even as exorbitant privilege fades.
John Minehan@JohnMinehan1

The only people with the capital to re-build the US is te PRC. So, either wait until that looks profitable for the Chinese banks or wait until some other pool of money appears (maybe West Africa?). Either way, a probable "Century of Humiliation."

English
2
0
12
864
Ryan Finlay
Ryan Finlay@ryanfinlay·
@jratcliff Long term, it's probably totally worth overbuilding these solar installations and moving away from gas appliances entirely and even having them be big enough to run air conditioning, charge electric cars etc. @superintoit has enough to mostly run a bakery off solar I believe.
English
1
0
1
40
Ryan Finlay
Ryan Finlay@ryanfinlay·
@MartyBent Followed by several rounds of AI induced layoffs. Quite the set of waves coming.
English
0
0
9
405