Ryan Inman

12 posts

Ryan Inman banner
Ryan Inman

Ryan Inman

@ryaninman

Investopedia Top 100 Advisor | MBA | Author, Financial Residency | Disappeared for a while. Building again.

Southern California Katılım Ocak 2026
55 Takip Edilen74 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Ryan Inman
Ryan Inman@ryaninman·
I had a top business podcast with several million downloads. Investopedia Top 100 Financial Advisor multiple years running. Panelist for the New England Journal of Medicine. Recommended by White Coat Investor. 300+ physician clients I cared for. Then I burned out and deleted everything 🔥 This is not a graceful comeback story. I transitioned my practice. Deleted social media. Walked away from an industry I'd spent over a decade building in. Not because I didn't care, but because I had nothing left. If you're a physician reading this, you probably know exactly what that feels like. I've had a lot of time to think about what's broken. Financial advice for physicians is either too expensive to access early in your career or too generic to be useful. The people who need guidance the most (residents, early attendings drowning in loans) get the least of it. So I'm building something new. Built for physician families. Designed for how your household actually works. A new podcast is about to drop where I'll be telling the full story soon. For now, I'm here, I've been building, and I've got a lot to say If you knew me before, I'm back If you didn't, I'm Ryan 👋 Let's go.
English
4
0
8
2.4K
Ryan Inman
Ryan Inman@ryaninman·
Yes the IRS confirms it explicitly. The exact language: "after the growth period, Trump accounts generally will be subject to the section 408 rules that apply to other traditional IRAs (such as the rules related to contributions, distributions, required minimum distributions, rollovers, Roth conversions, ordinary income taxation, and reporting)." Some light bedtime reading if you want to verify: irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n…
English
1
0
2
65
Jason Erickson, DO, MSPT
Jason Erickson, DO, MSPT@iSpineDoc·
@ryaninman genuine question, are we certain that we will be able to convert the Trump account to a Roth IRA at 18yo?
English
1
0
1
72
Ryan Inman
Ryan Inman@ryaninman·
Dave Ramsey is telling people to skip the Trump Account. He's wrong. And if you're a physician, especially a practice owner, ignoring this account could cost your kid $3,100,000 out. Tax free. Let me walk you through the math. If you own your practice and take a W2, your practice can contribute $2,500 per year to your child's Trump Account. That contribution is deductible by the practice AND excluded from your taxable income. You don't pay a dime of tax on it going in. Then you personally contribute another $2,500 per year after tax to hit the $5,000 annual cap. Don't own a practice, no problem, you can personally contribute the $5,000/yr (family can also assist!) Do that from birth to age 18. Add the $1,000 government seed on day one. Invest in a low cost S&P 500 index fund (the only option allowed, which is perfect for a long time horizon). Assume 7% average annual returns. At age 18, your kid has approximately $181,000 in that account. Here's where it gets interesting. Your kid turns 18. They're a college freshman with little to no income. You convert the entire Trump Account to a Roth IRA. The tax bill is roughly $20,000. You gift your kid the cash to cover the tax so the full $181,000 stays inside the Roth. From that moment forward, every dollar of growth is tax free. Forever. Without contributing another $1, account value... At age 30: ~$356,000 At age 40: ~$700,000 At age 50: ~$1,377,000 At age 60: ~$3,100,000 At a 4% withdrawal rate, that's $124,000 per year in tax free income. For life. From an account your child never contributed a single dollar to. And before someone says "but what if the market doesn't cooperate"... the 4% rule has been stress tested through Monte Carlo simulations across thousands of market scenarios including the Great Depression, the dot com crash, 2008, and COVID. At a 4% withdrawal rate with a diversified portfolio, the probability of the money lasting 30+ years exceeds 95% in virtually every credible study. For a 60 year old, that means the money outlasts them. The total out of pocket cost to the parents? $45,000 over 18 years if the practice covers half. The practice gets the tax deduction on its half. You don't recognize the income. $90,000 over 18 years if fully personally funded without any outside help. $45,000 in. $3,100,000 out. Tax free. Dave Ramsey gives advice for people digging out of credit card debt. That's his lane and he's good at it. But when it comes to tax advantaged planning for high income physician families, he's not even in the same zip code. Don't take financial planning advice from someone who doesn't understand your situation.
Dave Ramsey@DaveRamsey

Are Trump Accounts really the next big thing?

English
2
0
13
23.3K
Ryan Inman
Ryan Inman@ryaninman·
Great question. Two things most people miss about the Roth conversion here: Roth contributions (which is what the converted amount becomes) can be withdrawn tax and penalty free at any time. The 59.5 age restriction only applies to earnings. So that ~$181K converted balance is fully accessible after the 5 year seasoning period. It's not locked up. A UTMA gives flexibility, but the growth is taxed annually (dividends, capital gains distributions every year) and is subject to the kiddie tax above $2,700. The Roth grows completely tax free. Over 40 years that tax drag on a UTMA compounds into a meaningful gap. The real answer is both. UTMA for near term flexibility, Trump Account to Roth for the long term tax free compounding engine. They solve different problems. Personally, my end goal is to provide the most I can reasonably afford for my kids while raising them to understand money. I want them to have a solid foundation of income from investments throughout their lives, not just at retirement. That's why we use multiple account types for different time horizons.
English
0
0
1
377
Akhil A Saji, MD
Akhil A Saji, MD@asajimd·
@ryaninman What’s the end goal? The Roth conversion process makes sense if your goal is to contribute to your child’s distant retirement. otherwise the flexibility of the UTMA and capital gains treatment seems like it would be more practical for age 18-59?
English
1
0
2
410
Ryan Inman
Ryan Inman@ryaninman·
@DaveRamsey With respect Dave, this advice doesn’t apply to high income physicians. Practice owners get a business deduction on half the contributions AND pay zero income tax on that money going in. $45,000 total cost. $3.1 million tax free at age 60. I broke down the full math here:
Ryan Inman@ryaninman

Dave Ramsey is telling people to skip the Trump Account. He's wrong. And if you're a physician, especially a practice owner, ignoring this account could cost your kid $3,100,000 out. Tax free. Let me walk you through the math. If you own your practice and take a W2, your practice can contribute $2,500 per year to your child's Trump Account. That contribution is deductible by the practice AND excluded from your taxable income. You don't pay a dime of tax on it going in. Then you personally contribute another $2,500 per year after tax to hit the $5,000 annual cap. Don't own a practice, no problem, you can personally contribute the $5,000/yr (family can also assist!) Do that from birth to age 18. Add the $1,000 government seed on day one. Invest in a low cost S&P 500 index fund (the only option allowed, which is perfect for a long time horizon). Assume 7% average annual returns. At age 18, your kid has approximately $181,000 in that account. Here's where it gets interesting. Your kid turns 18. They're a college freshman with little to no income. You convert the entire Trump Account to a Roth IRA. The tax bill is roughly $20,000. You gift your kid the cash to cover the tax so the full $181,000 stays inside the Roth. From that moment forward, every dollar of growth is tax free. Forever. Without contributing another $1, account value... At age 30: ~$356,000 At age 40: ~$700,000 At age 50: ~$1,377,000 At age 60: ~$3,100,000 At a 4% withdrawal rate, that's $124,000 per year in tax free income. For life. From an account your child never contributed a single dollar to. And before someone says "but what if the market doesn't cooperate"... the 4% rule has been stress tested through Monte Carlo simulations across thousands of market scenarios including the Great Depression, the dot com crash, 2008, and COVID. At a 4% withdrawal rate with a diversified portfolio, the probability of the money lasting 30+ years exceeds 95% in virtually every credible study. For a 60 year old, that means the money outlasts them. The total out of pocket cost to the parents? $45,000 over 18 years if the practice covers half. The practice gets the tax deduction on its half. You don't recognize the income. $90,000 over 18 years if fully personally funded without any outside help. $45,000 in. $3,100,000 out. Tax free. Dave Ramsey gives advice for people digging out of credit card debt. That's his lane and he's good at it. But when it comes to tax advantaged planning for high income physician families, he's not even in the same zip code. Don't take financial planning advice from someone who doesn't understand your situation.

English
0
0
3
447
Dave Ramsey
Dave Ramsey@DaveRamsey·
Are Trump Accounts really the next big thing?
English
99
41
481
231.1K
Ryan Inman
Ryan Inman@ryaninman·
@JeffSteinerDO Thanks @JeffSteinerDO! Excited to be back. Have a lot of stuff in the works. Podcast next month and website launch the following is the plan. Full app tracking end of q2 as well!
English
0
0
1
13
Ryan Inman
Ryan Inman@ryaninman·
I had a top business podcast with several million downloads. Investopedia Top 100 Financial Advisor multiple years running. Panelist for the New England Journal of Medicine. Recommended by White Coat Investor. 300+ physician clients I cared for. Then I burned out and deleted everything 🔥 This is not a graceful comeback story. I transitioned my practice. Deleted social media. Walked away from an industry I'd spent over a decade building in. Not because I didn't care, but because I had nothing left. If you're a physician reading this, you probably know exactly what that feels like. I've had a lot of time to think about what's broken. Financial advice for physicians is either too expensive to access early in your career or too generic to be useful. The people who need guidance the most (residents, early attendings drowning in loans) get the least of it. So I'm building something new. Built for physician families. Designed for how your household actually works. A new podcast is about to drop where I'll be telling the full story soon. For now, I'm here, I've been building, and I've got a lot to say If you knew me before, I'm back If you didn't, I'm Ryan 👋 Let's go.
English
4
0
8
2.4K
Ryan Inman
Ryan Inman@ryaninman·
Regardless of where you land on the timeline, every physician should be stress testing their financial plan against this. A few things most doctors aren’t thinking about: Disability insurance policies don’t cover “your job was automated.” They cover inability to perform duties. Totally different risk. If reimbursement shifts to outcomes-based (CMS ACCESS), physician income concentration changes dramatically by specialty. Some go up, many go down. The doctors who’ll thrive financially aren’t the ones debating if this happens. They’re the ones building optionality now: multiple income streams, ownership stakes, skills that complement AI rather than compete with it. The clinical debate is important. The financial planning for it is urgent.
English
0
0
0
39
Derya Unutmaz, MD
Derya Unutmaz, MD@DeryaTR_·
I predicted about 2 years ago that we would eventually have full AI doctors, within 5-10 years. It got a hugely negative reaction: people insisted this would never happen, that doctors would always remain human, we’ve magical intuition AI can’t replace, liability was issue etc.
Brandon Ballinger@bballinger

The government wants AI doctors. In 60 days, four new initiatives have launched: - ARPA-H ADVOCATE: funding an autonomous AI cardiologist. - CMS ACCESS: pays for outcomes, not visits, with reimbursement set that you have to use software to scale. - FDA TEMPO: lets AI devices deploy before full clearance - Utah: AI can prescribe medication (refills at first). AI is coming to care delivery.

English
41
40
469
64.8K
Ryan Inman
Ryan Inman@ryaninman·
@olsonplanner Hey! Im almost ready to spill the beans. Show and site should be going live within a few weeks. App(s) in dev and looking at Q2 launch 👀
English
0
0
2
41
Tyler Olson, EA
Tyler Olson, EA@olsonplanner·
@ryaninman Hey Ryan, it's great to see you here! Curious to find out what you're building.
English
1
0
1
43
MatchtoMillionaireDO
MatchtoMillionaireDO@MatchtoMillion·
22 days into January and we've maxed 1 of 2 Roth IRAs. How long to max out the other? 🤔
English
1
0
2
106
Ryan Inman
Ryan Inman@ryaninman·
@elschwet Thanks! Looking forward to being back. Sounds like we should get the financial health assessments live asap 😉
English
0
0
1
72
eric schwetschenau
eric schwetschenau@elschwet·
@ryaninman Welcome back! As a closer to the end than the beginning physician with two children in medical school (I warned them!) I look forward to your return and learning how to help them in this ‘new’ era.
English
1
0
1
73