Ryvo

Bitcoin is the asset. Solana is the infrastructure.

"I do have some questions, like is it too restrictive if it's all based on linking tokens to ownership and legal structure" Luka, founder of Ryvo Network, on what he still doesn't fully understand about MetaDAO "The narrative sounds fun, it's like I see the vision. As far as I understand it's, what if you have someone who builds this crazy company and within like next couple of years or couple of months perhaps builds this great product and gets acquired by one of the big companies. And so it allows anyone I guess from all over the world to invest in those projects, and then when they get bought out they can be part of that buyout. So you kind of become part owner of the project" "It's interesting, but what I heard from others, we actually had a meetup yesterday with Superteam Georgia and we kind of talked about MetaDAO as well. Does a token even make sense, like what's the difference? Like that's one of the main questions I have to be honest" "I don't know, I'm trying to kind of like still feel it, because obviously this is not the final form. As far as I understand this is still brand new. Most launchpads are like you just launch a token and people snipe and then they dump and you have a narrative and it's like it's all pump and dump. So obviously MetaDAO is trying to do something different"

"The difference between Ryvo, Circle, Arc, and Tempo is that they're all permissioned. Ryvo is by nature non custodial and permissionless" Luka, founder of Ryvo Network, on how Ryvo differs from Stripe's Tempo and Circle's Arc "Tempo dropped and their whole idea was the chain for payments and x402. They have their own MPP, Machine Payments Protocol, which kind of rivals x402. The idea was that x402 is for stablecoins, but why can't agents use credit cards? So Stripe built Tempo, where you give your agent a credit card and pay over it" "Then you have Arc, another L1 by Circle for this specific use case. Do you need a new L1 for every single new use case that comes up? I don't think so. Besides Arc, Circle also has their nano payments gateway, a centralized service that offers gas free micropayments" "The difference between us and Circle, Arc, and Tempo is that they're all permissioned. Ryvo is by nature non custodial and permissionless, and the batching mechanism we use to scale those micropayments is available to everyone"

"If all those micropayments were made with x402 plus Ryvo, it would be 991 times cheaper" Luka, Founder of Ryvo Network, pitches one wallet for every API built to scale agentic micropayments "Subscriptions are inefficient, and I know this as a developer. I pay about $100 a month for platforms like Helius, Alchemy, and AI subscriptions, but I only consume about $20, so I'm overpaying $80 that goes to waste. x402 fixes that, letting you pay per call as you go. It's especially important for agents who don't have credit cards or bank accounts, they just need a wallet with a stablecoin" "But paying per call breaks at scale. If I bought the same API calls per call, the value would be $20, but the transaction fees to process those million micropayments would cost over $800 on Solana, and Solana is cheap. The fees would exceed the value by 40 times. Ryvo Network is a non custodial, composable, x402 compatible Solana program built specifically to scale micropayments" "I took data of x402 on Solana, roughly 7.58 million API calls. If all those micropayments were made with x402 plus Ryvo, the total cost would be $6, and the gap only grows with scale. And if all those agents transacted in yield bearing stablecoins, they'd have generated an additional $13,000 in yield. The thesis is simple, millions of agents, billions of micropayments, few settlements, and yield underneath"