Saad

191 posts

Saad banner
Saad

Saad

@saadk985

Computational Biologist | Member of Homo-sapiens. I have my opinions, so do respect and welcome other opinions as well.

World Katılım Eylül 2025
51 Takip Edilen4 Takipçiler
Saad
Saad@saadk985·
Friendly reminder: Rely on distributed and decentralized frameworks in every aspect of your life. As the government and corporates are proving themselves untrustworthy again and again, and the cost is always paid by civilians. We must go for something that bypasses their bulshit.
English
0
0
0
1
Saad
Saad@saadk985·
@Ric_RTP Just a simple line: Spatial intelligence on which Dr Fei-Fei Li is already working.
English
0
0
0
467
Ricardo
Ricardo@Ric_RTP·
The man who INVENTED modern AI just made a billion dollar bet that ChatGPT, Claude, and every AI company on earth is building the wrong technology. Yann LeCun won the Turing Award in 2018 for creating the neural networks that made AI possible. He spent a decade running AI research at Meta. Oversaw the creation of Llama and PyTorch, the tools that half the AI industry runs on. Then he quit. And raised $1.03 billion in a seed round. The LARGEST seed round in European history. $3.5 billion valuation before generating a single dollar of revenue. Bezos wrote the check. So did Nvidia. Samsung. Toyota. Temasek. Eric Schmidt. Mark Cuban. Tim Berners-Lee (the guy who invented the internet). His new company is called AMI Labs. And it's built on one thesis: Every AI company spending billions on large language models is wasting their money. ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok. They all work the same way. They predict the next word in a sequence. See "the cat sat on the" and predict "mat." Scale that to trillions of words and you get something that sounds intelligent. But LeCun says it doesn't UNDERSTAND anything. It can't reason. It can't plan. It can't predict what happens when you push a glass off a table. A two year old can do that. GPT-5 cannot. That's why AI hallucinates. It doesn't have a model of how the world actually works. It just predicts words. His solution? Something called JEPA. Instead of predicting words, it learns how the PHYSICAL WORLD works. Abstract representations of reality. Not language but physics. Think about what that means. Current AI can write your emails. LeCun's AI could design a car, run a factory, operate a robot, or diagnose a patient without hallucinating and killing someone. The CEO of AMI said it perfectly: "Factories, hospitals, and robots need AI that grasps reality. Predicting tokens doesn't cut it." And here's what's really crazy to me... LeCun isn't some outsider throwing rocks. He literally built the foundations that ChatGPT runs on. He knows exactly how these systems work because he helped create them. And after watching the entire industry sprint in one direction for three years, he raised a billion dollars to run the OPPOSITE way. No product. No revenue. No timeline. Just pure research. He told investors it could take YEARS to produce anything commercial. But they funded it anyway in just four months. Meanwhile OpenAI just raised $120 billion and still can't stop their models from making things up. Anthropic is building AI so dangerous they're afraid to release it. Google is burning billions trying to catch up. And the guy who started it all says they're all solving the wrong problem. Two Turing Award winners raised $2 billion in three weeks betting AGAINST the entire LLM approach. LeCun at AMI. Fei-Fei Li at World Labs. The smartest people in AI are quietly building the exit from the technology everyone else is betting their future on. Either they're wrong and the trillion dollar LLM industry keeps printing. Or they're right and every AI company on earth just built on a foundation that's about to crack.
English
456
1.5K
4.8K
585.8K
Saad
Saad@saadk985·
@marklevinshow It is amusing to see these so-called "Ex Muslims" bragging that they know the stuff. What you see here is "Extremism", the same one American Defense Secretory is showing to you. Islamic women were entrepreneurs and fighters when these so-called civilized people used to burn them.
English
0
0
0
5
Saad
Saad@saadk985·
@robbystarbuck I often tell people that our mind is so powerful that we can prove satan righteous and God an evil. This is in action🙌
English
0
0
0
1
Robby Starbuck
Robby Starbuck@robbystarbuck·
My gut reaction when I heard that Israel blocked Cardinal Pizzaballa from the Church of the Holy Sepulchre was that it’s wrong to block him, BUT, I totally understand why they did. Iran would love to kill a man who was almost Pope on Palm Sunday & destroy a holy Christian site. They need to quickly find a way to secure these sites as top priorities so everyone can worship safely but I don’t think Israel should be hit too hard for trying to prevent a terror attack. Both sides (Israel and Pizzaballa) have good reasons for how they feel here.
Collin Rugg@CollinRugg

JUST IN: Israel says they are coming up with a “plan” to allow church leaders to worship at the holy site “in the coming days” after Cardinal Pizzaballa was blocked from entering the Church of the Holy Sepulchre on Palm Sunday. Netanyahu’s office has released the following statement: “Over the past several days, Iran has repeatedly targeted the holy sites of all three monotheistic religions in Jerusalem with ballistic missiles. In one strike, missile fragments crashed meters from the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. As a result, Israel has temporarily asked worshippers from all faiths not to worship at the holy sites in Jerusalem's Old City to protect them. Today, out of special concern for his safety, Jerusalem police prevented the Latin Patriarch Cardinal Pizzaballa from holding mass this morning at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. Again, there was no malicious intent whatsoever, only concern for his safety and that of his party. However, given the holiness of the week leading up to Easter for the world's Christians, Israel's security arms are putting together a plan to enable church leaders to worship at the holy site in the coming days.” Video: tzogho / tt.

English
665
118
934
371.2K
Saad
Saad@saadk985·
@ImtiazMadmood Atheists don't behave like that. Grow up man.
English
0
0
0
6
Imtiaz Mahmood
Imtiaz Mahmood@ImtiazMadmood·
Muslims instigate strife all over the world and play the sympathy card when faced with the consequences, and idiots buy it up. A muslim is someone who worships, espouses, and submits their life to the lunatic ramblings of a sadistic, inbreeding, 7th-century, paedophile warlord who is still the role model for a quarter of the world's population. They are victims of stringent, intellectually stifling, Islamic brainwashing, and hundreds of millions of them are affected by compromised genetics through generations of Islamically encouraged inbreeding. Still, it has made them what they are. Compared to people of all other beliefs, one religion spawns by far the least peaceful, least tolerant and most ignorant people and we are more than bad enough without that awful shit. People who aren't brainwashed-by that shit yet defend, support and pander to it enabling its proliferation are so much more contemptible.
Imtiaz Mahmood tweet media
English
78
779
1.3K
22.7K
Saad
Saad@saadk985·
@ImtiazMadmood It's quite interesting that you call yourself an atheist, yet compare religions in Judaism > Christianity > Islam order. A bit of an unbiased layer-by-layer review of your profile is enough to see whether you share your views or are just a part of propaganda.
English
0
0
0
21
Saad
Saad@saadk985·
@KimDotcom Just imagine the cruelty that the people who die for their country are treated. Worse, the people who die for other countries (guinea pigs).
English
0
0
0
3
Kim Dotcom
Kim Dotcom@KimDotcom·
Getting ready to die for Israel.
Kim Dotcom tweet media
English
5.1K
19.7K
87.1K
2.8M
Saad
Saad@saadk985·
@nxt888 For them, everyone who is loaded with technology, goes to night clubs, has sex with multiple ladies, whose women in society are independent (naked), values life and is highly intellectual. All else are a tribe from the Amazon forest.
English
0
0
0
66
Sony Thăng
Sony Thăng@nxt888·
General William Westmoreland, the American commander in Vietnam, said that Asians do not value human life the way Westerners do. He said this to explain why Vietnamese soldiers kept fighting despite losses that would have broken Western armies. He did not say: perhaps they are fighting for something worth dying for. He did not say: perhaps our intelligence about their will to fight was wrong. He did not say: perhaps we have fundamentally misunderstood this enemy. He said: they don't value life. This is what happens when an army built on the premise of its own civilizational superiority meets a people who simply refuse to accept that premise. The army cannot update its model. It cannot say "we were wrong about who these people are." So it invents a theory where the enemy's resistance is not a sign of strength but a sign of deficiency. They keep fighting because life is cheap to them. Not because their cause is just. Not because they are brave. Because they are less than us. Westmoreland ran the war for years on this theory. He lost. The Vietnamese people, who apparently did not value life, built a country that is alive and growing and free. Westmoreland died in 2005. The people he could not understand are still here. So is the theory.
Sony Thăng tweet media
English
457
3.7K
10.7K
370.9K
Saad
Saad@saadk985·
@kimmonismus AI progress is mainly industry centric and government system is too slow and fucked up when it tries to contain or maintain it. The government can't even decide direction in a period of 6 months while the industry launches every new feature in a week. Bad match.
English
0
0
0
16
Chubby♨️
Chubby♨️@kimmonismus·
Reading the Saturday edition of Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (my daily newspaper). There’s an interview between a journalist and an AI expert, and something struck me. In Germany, the conversation around AI is almost entirely framed through fear. Should we “consume” AI in moderation, like a good beer? Who is responsible when it makes mistakes? Does it make us less intelligent if we use it too much? And so on. Not a single question focuses on the upside. Not one tries to explore what AI could actually do for humanity. Instead, the underlying question always seems to be: How much suffering will AI bring? This is absurd.
Chubby♨️ tweet media
English
103
43
616
37.9K
Saad
Saad@saadk985·
@KarolineGosling To win a woman's heart. Else they were labeled as jealous. My honest take is, if we truly embrace feminism, men would be at an advantage ironically. But women chase hype so they won't ever understand.
English
0
0
0
99
Karoline Gosling
Karoline Gosling@KarolineGosling·
I have no idea how Feminism is so accepted.. Like Women are quite retarded, I get it.. Personal Experience. But how did it persuade the men??
English
331
40
740
40.1K
Saad
Saad@saadk985·
@History__Speaks She is propaganda. Just visit her profile, you would clearly see some under the hood patterns.
English
0
0
0
63
History Speaks
History Speaks@History__Speaks·
There is something very sinister afoot here, and we have to be able to criticize it honestly. For someone to advocate that the universities in the country she grew up in be bombed - this would be a war crime in any war, much less a completely stupid and immoral and doomed war of aggression - is not normal behavior. This is a cult. Social scientists need to study the role of Iran International and other Intelligence-backed media in all this. Trauma cannot explain denying and/or justifying the far worse trauma Iranians in Iran are dealing with now. Nor can a bad experience with Islam. I have more than one Copt in my extended family who absolutely despise Islam but they wouldn't want to see Egyptian universities bombed much less in a war of aggression. Wtf is this? It's literally the equivalent of Americans supporting the bombing of MIT (which is also connected to the military, much closer connection by the way than those of Iranian universities).
History Speaks tweet media
English
104
438
2K
50.5K
Saad
Saad@saadk985·
@mhdksafa I believe that even if one city deserves to be nuked and we justify it, then the whole world deserves to be nuked.
English
0
0
0
9
Mohamad Safa
Mohamad Safa@mhdksafa·
I don't think people understand the gravity of the situation as the UN is preparing for possible nuclear weapon use in Iran. This is a picture of Tehran. For you uneducated, untraveled, never-served, warhawks licking your chops at the thought of bombing it. It's not some low population desert. There are families, children, family pets. Regular working class people with dreams. You're sick to want war. Tehran is a city of nearly 10,000,000 people. Imagine nuking Washington, Berlin, Paris, London, or beyond, bombed with nuclear weapons. I gave up my diplomatic career to leak this information. I suspended my duties so as not to be part of or a witness to this crime against humanity, in an attempt to prevent a nuclear winter before it is too late. Yesterday, nearly ten million people protested “No Kings” in the United States. The possibility of the use of nuclear weapons must be taken very seriously. It's dangerous. Act now. Spread this message worldwide. Take the streets. Protest for our humanity and future. Only the people can stop it. History will remember us.
Mohamad Safa tweet media
English
4.1K
56.7K
141.5K
11.6M
Saad
Saad@saadk985·
@GenAI_is_real I agree honestly. We are too focused on upgrading hardware.
English
0
0
1
15
Chayenne Zhao
Chayenne Zhao@GenAI_is_real·
unpopular opinion: 16GB is plenty if software engineers actually cared about memory efficiency. chrome eating 4GB for 12 tabs is not a hardware problem its a software disgrace. docker consuming 2GB idle is not a feature its laziness. we live in an era where people optimize every single token to save $0.001 on API costs but happily ship electron apps that eat 500MB to display a todo list. if the industry treated RAM the way we treat inference compute - obsessively measuring every byte - 16GB would feel luxurious. the hardware isnt the problem, the software is @adxtyahq
aditya@adxtyahq

never buy a 16GB RAM laptop in 2026. you’ll regret it within a week

English
622
6.5K
59.4K
2.3M
Saad retweetledi
Dan Burmawi
Dan Burmawi@DanBurmawy·
There is a species of ant that approaches the edge of another colony, kills a single worker, and then takes on the dead ant’s scent. For ants, scent is everything. Wearing that scent, the intruder walks in with no resistance. The workers pass by without concern. The intruder moves inward, toward the queen, then It sprays the queen with a different scent that makes the workers turn on her. Then they surround her and kill her. The intruder does not need to fight anyone. The colony does the work itself. Once the queen is gone, the intruder reproduces. The true invader is no longer an intruder. It is the future. This is how ideological takeover works. A destructive foreign ideology takes the scent of familiar ideas and walks in as if it belongs. It speaks the native vocabulary, justice, equality, compassion, rights, progress. It uses these words and quietly changes what they point to. Then it moves inward. It alters how foundations are perceived. Responsibility is made to smell like cruelty, law like oppression, borders like hatred, tradition like danger, history like guilt. At that point, the civilization turns on itself. Its courts, universities, churches, media, and bureaucracies begin treating their own foundations as threats. They believe they are defending the system. They are enforcing what now smells legitimate. They do not see the intruder because it sounds exactly like them. And when the founding principles are finally removed, discredited, dismantled, erased, the foreign ideology does not need to conquer anything. It inherits what is left. The queen is gone. The colony is no longer itself. The most effective conquest is the one that convinces a society that its own foundations are the enemy, and that killing them is an act of virtue.
English
1.2K
9.5K
25.4K
1.1M
Saad
Saad@saadk985·
@0ddmonger @karpathy Nailed it. It certainly is possible that LLM catches certain subtle patterns, and we might end up with sycophancy at the end. But this depends more on the user ig.
English
0
0
1
103
Krishang
Krishang@0ddmonger·
@karpathy Wow looks like claude found something against this as well. Normal context windows cannot handle 4 hours worth of conversation in one chat. What if the LLM starts softening its counters after a decent amount of context towards which side we’re leaning?
English
3
0
3
8.6K
Andrej Karpathy
Andrej Karpathy@karpathy·
- Drafted a blog post - Used an LLM to meticulously improve the argument over 4 hours. - Wow, feeling great, it’s so convincing! - Fun idea let’s ask it to argue the opposite. - LLM demolishes the entire argument and convinces me that the opposite is in fact true. - lol The LLMs may elicit an opinion when asked but are extremely competent in arguing almost any direction. This is actually super useful as a tool for forming your own opinions, just make sure to ask different directions and be careful with the sycophancy.
English
1.7K
2.4K
31.1K
3.3M
Saad
Saad@saadk985·
@leonardaisfunE She needs chaos to thrive her propaganda. That's what they always do.
English
0
0
0
1
Leonarda Jonie
Leonarda Jonie@leonardaisfunE·
Here you can see the witch is trying to threaten me after she got her information from Indians. How about another defamation lawsuit for you, Laura?
Laura Loomer@LauraLoomer

Is it true that you are an illegal alien? How come you haven’t been deported by ICE? @ICEgov Is it true that you and your family are illegal immigrants from Albania and that your father works as an immigration attorney for illegals? How about I report you and your daddy to ICE and we can find out? @leonardaisfunE

English
128
192
2.6K
61K
Saad
Saad@saadk985·
@_robyn_smith Because, it's less fancy or not fancy at all.
English
0
0
0
2
Saad
Saad@saadk985·
@karpathy I am wondering what I should call it. It is a strange coincidence that right now, I am working on a model locally to make it look like you by using RAG and you just mentioned these implications.
English
0
0
0
5
Andrej Karpathy
Andrej Karpathy@karpathy·
One common issue with personalization in all LLMs is how distracting memory seems to be for the models. A single question from 2 months ago about some topic can keep coming up as some kind of a deep interest of mine with undue mentions in perpetuity. Some kind of trying too hard.
English
1.8K
1.1K
21.3K
2.6M
Saad
Saad@saadk985·
Honestly.
Ethan Brooks@alt_w_v_g

Went to the grocery store this morning Bread, milk, eggs $47.63 The screen asked if I'd like to round up to support a children's hospital I pressed no The cashier looked at me The woman behind me looked at me My wife looked at the ceiling Again This company made $14 billion last year They can round up Went to get gas after The pump asked if I'd like to add $1 to support veterans I support veterans I pressed no A $200 billion oil company asking me to fund their charity while I'm paying $3.89 a gallon That's not philanthropy That's outsourcing Drove through for lunch Taco Bell The screen said "round up for education?" A fast food company asking me to fund scholarships while paying their employees $11 an hour I pressed no My wife said "you know you're arguing with screens today" She was right But the screens started it Went to the pharmacy Picked up a prescription $340 after insurance The screen asked if I'd like to donate $1 to help families in need I just paid $340 for a medication that costs $4 to manufacture And now you want a dollar I pressed no The pharmacist said "it's just a dollar" I said "it's never just a dollar" She didn't respond Got home My wife said "you said no to a children's hospital, veterans, education, and families in need today" I said "no. I said no to four corporations who want me to fund their goodwill so they can put it in their annual report" She was quiet Then she said "you're not wrong" I said "I know" She said "but you're still going to look like a monster" I said "I'd rather look like a monster than quietly fund a billion-dollar company's PR strategy at the register" She didn't disagree But she didn't look at me either Plz fix. Thx. Sent from my iPhone

English
0
0
0
7