Krishang

329 posts

Krishang banner
Krishang

Krishang

@0ddmonger

granular thoughts and right of first refusal

Katılım Kasım 2022
66 Takip Edilen14 Takipçiler
Krishang
Krishang@0ddmonger·
@DylanMcD8 Hey mate, this definitely is catfish Accessibility features have been there since forever. Just an Apple thing, not agentic AI
English
0
0
0
342
Dylan
Dylan@DylanMcD8·
Correct me if I'm wrong but it sure looks like Apple just casually dropped agentic AI being built into iPhone Yes, in this video it's being used for Voice Control, but if a person can control their iPhone with natural language so can an AI agent!
English
48
40
1.3K
474.2K
Nikunj Kothari
Nikunj Kothari@nikunj·
I have been using this Mac App for almost 15 (?) years now to keep my laptop awake.. Just putting it here for the agents all day crowd who are keeping their lids open caffeine-app.net
English
21
3
135
24.8K
cam worboys
cam worboys@camworboys·
Nearby payments. Rolling out a pilot this week. No QR codes. Just Bluetooth. Great for getting paid by strangers. Or sorting a round at the bar. Well done @DamjanStankovic and team on this beauty.
English
100
120
1.5K
358.8K
Krishang
Krishang@0ddmonger·
Are you playing to win or are you playing not to lose
English
0
0
0
22
siddharth
siddharth@buildwithsid·
why does india not have a single serious ai model for coding or general use, every major drop is still from usa or china what are we doing with soo many devs
English
215
15
715
92K
Krishang
Krishang@0ddmonger·
I don’t think that’s true. Why? well… Some equity MFs have quite literally offered 10-18% returns across 4 years starting 2022. That’s net of fees, not annualised. Liquid funds have done better in the same timeline. The ideology of mutual funds being a game played across decades, let’s hope that’s true for the 2022,23 vintage (MF investors who had just started working around then or just before, would be 25-29 right now)
English
0
0
0
53
Ritesh Banglani
Ritesh Banglani@banglani·
Me: What's your downside when you invest in a mutual fund? 25 yo: Uh, the management fee I pay. That's why I will always choose a direct fund. Me: Ok, what other downside? 25: Uh, the opportunity cost. Could I have got better returns by investing somewhere else? This is what happens when an entire generation grows up having never experienced a downturn.
English
21
6
112
19.3K
Krishang
Krishang@0ddmonger·
I think this reversal of vibe coders’ main statement about product teams creating apps makes a lot more sense from the opposite end of the spectrum, aka adam’s approach. Making engineers think in terms of product would be so much more beneficial in the long run. They can code 10X faster and choose the right path/direction for a feature. That’s the dream or the 2010s
English
0
0
0
81
Harry Stebbings
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings·
Why this $160 billion company does not have a product organization? "We do not have a separate product organization, our engineers are the product managers. In an AI native world, engineers need to be imaginative and think in terms of product, not just code. They may not write every line themselves, but they must understand, review and own the output." What do product teams of the future look like @karrisaarinen @zoink @GergelyOrosz @lennysan @gustavs
Harry Stebbings@HarryStebbings

Adam Foroughi is by far one of the best CEOs I have ever interviewed. Candidly he is insanely stern and cold but also obsessive, focused and utterly brilliant. With Adam there is zero fluff, like none. He says what he means and means what he says. Applovin does $10M EBITDA per head. They have 80%+ margins. They do $5.48BN in revenue. No business on the planet has numbers like Applovin. Following the discussion, I wrote up my biggest lessons from sitting down with him and summarised them below: 1. Are People Ready for the AI Future That Is Within Every Company? True AI integration requires a massive "leveling up" of talent. Companies must be honest about the path forward: keeping employees who fail to adopt AI creates a "blockade" to reaching a truly AI-native state. Consequently, we should expect continued tech layoffs as organizations prioritize efficiency over legacy headcount. 2. Biggest Advice on Token Budgeting and Token Maxing? Treating tokens as a simple budget or leaderboard is "flawed logic". If you incentivize raw usage, teams will simply create high-volume "crap" that burns capital without driving revenue. Instead, optimize for specific KPIs where token consumption aligns directly with business growth; when revenue is on the other side, the "budget" mindset disappears. 3. Can You Have a Team Full of Only A Players? An organization cannot thrive if A players are surrounded by B, C, or D players. AppLovin slimmed its HR department from 80 people to 15 by retaining only "doers" who don't get bogged down in the process. The goal is a lean culture of individual contributors who want to make a difference without needing heavy management layers. 4. Do the Majority of Company Teams Need to Be Rebuilt for the Technology We Have Today? If a role is likely to be automated, or if a department is too slow to adopt AI, it is time to rebuild that organization from the ground up. Foroughi cut staff by 40-50% in most departments during a year of triple-digit growth to force the organization into an automated, efficient state. 5. Why Investors Need to Give Ceos Better Comp Packages Founders take massive risks to build something out of nothing, and they need continued upside to stay mentally motivated. If a CEO is expected to work without performance-based incentives, they may drift toward new ventures rather than staying committed to the "lonely, stressful" task of scaling a public company. 6. Why This $160 Billion Company Does Not Have Any Learning and Development Structured L&D is often disconnected from the reality of high-performance work. The best employees are curious enough to figure things out on their own. By documenting all communication in transcripts and chats, new hires can use AI models to summarize tribal knowledge and develop themselves more effectively than any formal training program. (links below)

English
8
6
33
14.3K
Krishang
Krishang@0ddmonger·
@fortelabs Love notion and Ivan as well and I hope that it’s not sponsored
English
0
0
0
121
Krishang
Krishang@0ddmonger·
@fortelabs 2nd article trying to negate how amazing Obsidian is, in a span of 24 hours? Don’t get why obsidian being thrown under the bus when it’s quite literally the best GUI to exist that is cohesive with agent tasks.
English
5
0
48
2.7K
Tiago Forte
Tiago Forte@fortelabs·
Is it true that Obsidian only has around 1.5 million users!? Compared to 225 million for Evernote at its peak? So Obsidian has only reached 0.7% the size of the Evernote user base. It's a niche of a niche of a niche.
Tiago Forte tweet mediaTiago Forte tweet media
English
103
7
377
77.4K
grim
grim@grimcodes·
HOW? how is this even possible? ive sent, no joke, 10 messages on opus 4.6. these limits are a joke
grim tweet media
English
104
18
1K
102.6K
Krishang
Krishang@0ddmonger·
@jspeiser Claude subscription users already report better performance during off-peak hours. It’s a small lil nifty hack that a lot of prosumers are using right now. Started when the whole rate limits debacle started 4 weeks ago
English
1
1
5
375
Joe Speiser ⚡️
Joe Speiser ⚡️@jspeiser·
every AI company charges the same per token whether it's 2pm on a Tuesday or 3am on a Sunday. their GPUs are not equally busy at both times. electric companies started dynamic pricing 50 years ago. pay less at night, pay less on weekends, pay more during peak. Obvious no? if Claude or GPT offered off-peak rates, every company would shift their batch jobs to nights / weekends overnight. literally. the compute is sitting there. the capacity fluctuates. the pricing doesn't. this feels like an obvious unlock that nobody's building yet. am i missing something?
English
18
2
29
7.9K
Krishang
Krishang@0ddmonger·
It’s been a minute and here’s where my head’s at right now. Context was the loudest outcry through the most of last year. It largely seems to have been fixed today with the use of 1M context windows and sub-agents that have their own context limits. Nested agents for the win? Interesting times for sure.
English
0
0
0
31
Krishang
Krishang@0ddmonger·
The one front on which even an avid AI user like me disagrees with is that UI takes a big hit. GUI will continue to exist as humans will need that last mile interaction. Although a genuine agent layer for all applications human need, will exist very very soon. Maybe not for mass consumer products but definitely for B2B products/applications.
English
0
0
0
1.1K
signüll
signüll@signulll·
the future interface is probably three layers: 1. ambient intent capture voice, location, calendar, screen context, messages, habits, biometrics, etc. the system understands what you’re trying to do before you explicitly “open” anything or augments your intent deeply. 2. agentic execution the actual work happens through agents operating software, apis, browsers, documents, email, calendars, workflows, payments, support systems, whatever. most “computer use” becomes machine to machine clerical labor. 3. ephemeral verification ux humans still need to inspect, compare, approve, edit, reject, or enjoy things. that’s where gui survives but as disposable, task specific surfaces generated for the moment.
English
146
232
2.5K
180.9K
major tom
major tom@tailwiinder·
As models become unreliable and more expensive, we slowly start to make some tiny code changes manually. “Why waste my 4-request daily limit on this tiny issue when I can make the change in 30 seconds?” During uptime, we ask models to write proper docs so that we can make changes when models are down and/or nerfed into pure stupidity. We slowly realise that true reliability lies in ourselves. Everything else is maya. We start to write more and more code by ourselves until one night we look back at the day and realise that we’ve barely used AI for anything more than autocomplete features. Slowly, the AI bubble bursts. “Remember that AI company? Man they could’ve been huge had they not been destroyed by their own greed” You are expected to grind leetcode again. You do it happily. The simpler times are back. The systems that the entire world ran on once have been reduced to tiny non-intrusive support instruments in the form of chrome and vscode extensions.
English
15
6
139
5.7K
Krishang
Krishang@0ddmonger·
@nickbaumann_ @OpenAI 5.5 released like 3 days back? What’s with clickbait content moving to twitter? Fake marketing hype round 2 now?
English
0
0
1
2.3K
Krishang
Krishang@0ddmonger·
@ClaudeDevs At this point it's like taking candy from a kid. Withdrawal is going to be pretty bad when this stops.
English
0
0
0
4.4K
ClaudeDevs
ClaudeDevs@ClaudeDevs·
Over the past month, some of you reported Claude Code's quality had slipped. We investigated, and published a post-mortem on the three issues we found. All are fixed in v2.1.116+ and we’ve reset usage limits for all subscribers.
English
1.9K
2.6K
39.9K
6.5M
Krishang
Krishang@0ddmonger·
@ClaudeDevs Much needed article, sometimes even an npm bundle like playwright is much better than playwright mcp. Easier tool calls and a lot more in terms of functionality
English
0
0
3
3.7K
ClaudeDevs
ClaudeDevs@ClaudeDevs·
New blog: Building agents that reach production systems with MCP. When should agents use direct APIs vs CLIs vs MCP? Plus patterns for building MCP servers, context-efficient clients and pairing MCP with skills. claude.com/blog/building-…
English
93
319
3.3K
477.1K
Mr.Touchdowns
Mr.Touchdowns@packers_owner_j·
@0ddmonger @emollick Do you mean flash lite, or flash live perhaps? "3.1 Flash" sadly isn't out yet (I am early awaiting it!)
English
1
0
0
45
Ethan Mollick
Ethan Mollick@emollick·
The continuing gap between the capabilities of Gemini Pro 3.1 (very good model) and the capabilities of the Gemini app/website is odd. The model can do what Claude/GPT can do, but there is a minimal harness for tools (file creation, research etc), no auditable CoT/actions, manual canvas, etc. The reason this is odd is that Google is trusted by enterprises & has the compute to burn, so a good harness would solve so many of Gemini’s gaps and make it an easier sell to companies. The model can make Office documents, for example, but the harness doesn’t allow it. It could also decide when to use other Google tools (and Google has a lot of very good AI tools) and apply them, taking advantage of the ecosystem, but it doesn’t consistently. I assume something will be coming out here eventually, but the gap with Claude and ChatGPT has only been growing.
English
104
70
1.3K
91.5K
Krishang
Krishang@0ddmonger·
The Big Picture I am learning it the hard way that systems that run deep, that have multiple layers and huge codebases, cannot be 'vibe coded'. It needs deep understanding of how a particular system works and how it gels in with the rest of your project's architecture. This 'understanding' needs some real time and effort to attain, something that claude alone cannot help you with.
English
0
0
0
47