sabbathi

237 posts

sabbathi banner
sabbathi

sabbathi

@sabbathiRL

Katılım Eylül 2022
215 Takip Edilen6 Takipçiler
Liquid Thdlock
Liquid Thdlock@Thdlock·
Revert the addon restrictions for the average joe!
English
9
13
446
33.7K
sabbathi
sabbathi@sabbathiRL·
@justarandom46 @KariKurei @TheRailery @Thdlock I mean it’s not really. In TWW everyone would need to have the NS synced so all our raid WAs are synced and we would have warnings, graphics and sounds flashing on our screen all the time. Not to mention some bosses being solved purely through automatic assignments etc
English
1
0
0
76
It is him
It is him@justarandom46·
@sabbathiRL @KariKurei @TheRailery @Thdlock The game is the same game as the war within if you wanted to quit you should’ve done it. The only change is that most people are using 20 other addons to get their ui the way they want instead of 1 weakaura addon and the top end guilds have their own “weak auras” that we don’t.
English
2
0
3
100
sabbathi
sabbathi@sabbathiRL·
@KariKurei @TheRailery @Thdlock no we dont, i'd probably quit if they reversed the changes. i dont care if like 3 guilds at the top have functional addons
English
2
0
0
223
🔇 KariKurei 🔇
🔇 KariKurei 🔇@KariKurei·
@TheRailery @Thdlock They absolutely do. the top end players are basically unaffected by the addon changes. but the quality of pug raids/m+ is absolutely worse. removing addons hurts the average and below player much worse than anyone else.
English
3
0
13
645
sabbathi
sabbathi@sabbathiRL·
@Elle_Ham06 @ali__samson Did you even read what I said before or the article I linked? They ARE attacking from our bases and are given express permission to!
English
1
0
0
19
Ellen 😸
Ellen 😸@Elle_Ham06·
@sabbathiRL @ali__samson They're only allowed to carry out defensive operations from our bases, not to attack, ergo, a huge difference.
English
1
0
0
26
ali
ali@ali__samson·
The insanity of this app when it comes to Starmer criticism captured perfectly in this timeline placement.
ali tweet media
English
7
113
954
35.7K
sabbathi
sabbathi@sabbathiRL·
@Elle_Ham06 @ali__samson Hardly a difference in war. Without our involvement the US + Israel would be unable to carry out some of the operations they have been. If someone wanted to hurt me, and another person willingly handed the attacker the knife, are they not both culpable for my injury?
English
1
0
0
22
sabbathi
sabbathi@sabbathiRL·
@Elle_Ham06 @ali__samson Not to mention that the overwhelming majority of anti-drone and anti-missile defence capabilities come from ground-based targeting rockets that intercept shortly before drones/missile strike their targets.
English
0
0
0
20
sabbathi
sabbathi@sabbathiRL·
@Elle_Ham06 @ali__samson How is facilitating airstrikes on a country we’re not at war at protecting our bases? We have an anti-drone ship headed to Cyprus already and that airbase has not attacked by Iran
English
1
0
0
45
sabbathi
sabbathi@sabbathiRL·
@Elle_Ham06 @ali__samson -the US by letting them use our airbases for “defensive” strikes. It’s purposefully obtuse communication by the Starmer cabinet to try to appeal to everyone, but is completely unproductive
English
1
0
1
59
sabbathi
sabbathi@sabbathiRL·
@Elle_Ham06 @ali__samson Doesn’t help when the messaging is so mixed from the PM himself. He talks about not getting involved and in the same breath commits to aiding-
English
1
0
1
87
sabbathi
sabbathi@sabbathiRL·
@DerpsClassicOG @tylerwith4rs -but because data centers heavily prioritise cheap power to reduce operating costs they actually average towards using cleaner sources of energy, such as nuclear, compared to most industrial aspects of our society or even the average persons home.
English
0
0
2
155
sabbathi
sabbathi@sabbathiRL·
@DerpsClassicOG @tylerwith4rs Large scale data centers can be problematic because they cause massive amounts of noise pollution, the demand for materials to create more computer parts has a downstream effect as creating microchips can be very polluting. Data centers also do consume large amounts of power-
English
1
0
3
159
sabbathi
sabbathi@sabbathiRL·
@vistadelray @keomoakoa @DeadlockAnon it’s cheating because it removes mental load from you, allowing you to delegate it elsewhere which is unfair to everyone else. but some of these mods are also way more than that, i know that qol-lock lets you boost footstep sounds too
English
1
0
2
66
sabbathi
sabbathi@sabbathiRL·
@dxpper @KnomadicZekrom @JackDunc1 I understand. In other interviews on this subject he does articulate himself much better on this and broadly I do think he is much more policy-focused and articulate than most politicians, so I’m not bothered by it here.
English
0
0
1
24
Malcolm🇮🇷🇦🇫
Malcolm🇮🇷🇦🇫@dxpper·
@sabbathiRL @KnomadicZekrom @JackDunc1 What you’re saying makes perfect sense and is backed by statistics. What Zack is saying doesn’t. At absolute best it’s extremely, extremely sloppy phrasing. So that invokes another question, do I want to vote for a man that can’t articulate himself better than 2 randoms on X?
English
2
0
0
41
sabbathi
sabbathi@sabbathiRL·
@dxpper @KnomadicZekrom @JackDunc1 Because in Portugal, and Denmark as well, not too well-versed on other countries; these drug centers offer free drugs to addicts, and so they're actively taking money away from the black market whilst also providing an avenue for recovery and safely weaning them off hard drugs
English
1
0
1
43
Malcolm🇮🇷🇦🇫
Malcolm🇮🇷🇦🇫@dxpper·
@sabbathiRL @KnomadicZekrom @JackDunc1 If people aren’t scared of criminal proceedings they’re more likely to seek help So how would possession of drugs being made illegal make drug selling less profitable and unsustainable? Of course you will curb crime rates if something previously illegal is no longer an offence.
English
1
0
0
42
sabbathi
sabbathi@sabbathiRL·
@dxpper @KnomadicZekrom @JackDunc1 I mentioned it as well, is because the overwhelming majority of users of dangerous, hard drugs, are people who a repeat users and so by redirecting them to drug centers run by the NHS, they're not giving money to the black market anymore and can also safely be weaned off drugs
English
1
0
1
17
sabbathi
sabbathi@sabbathiRL·
@dxpper @KnomadicZekrom @JackDunc1 I understand what you're saying, and I think he could've phrased it much better, but from hearing him speak about this policy and also from reading the Green's drug policy on their site; it's exactly like Portugal's system. The reason that he talks about the black market, and why
English
1
0
1
18
sabbathi
sabbathi@sabbathiRL·
@dxpper @KnomadicZekrom @JackDunc1 -deaths, overdoses, HIV/AIDS infection rates, a significant reduction in adolescent drug use, as well as a 12% reduction in social costs from drug use. It also helps make illicit drug selling less profitable and unsustainable, curbing crime rates overall.
English
1
0
1
40
sabbathi
sabbathi@sabbathiRL·
@dxpper @KnomadicZekrom @JackDunc1 I understand that it might seem like a shocking policy, but this sort of approach to drug use is present in several European countries to great success. The clearest example is Portugal, which implemented this sort of policy in 2001 and saw a tenfold reduction in drug related-
English
2
0
1
58