Sahil Gupta

1.5K posts

Sahil Gupta banner
Sahil Gupta

Sahil Gupta

@sahil5d

Spase, Big Circus Model

Silicon Valley Katılım Haziran 2017
141 Takip Edilen290 Takipçiler
Sahil Gupta
Sahil Gupta@sahil5d·
When human civ eventually sends robotic probes to other star systems, we would say hello and start interacting with any alien life (like we do with species on Earth (think David Attenborough)). We wouldn't send probes for silent scanning only. So, alien probes having visited us is unlikely.
English
0
0
0
55
Sahil Gupta
Sahil Gupta@sahil5d·
@sahil50/satoshi-nakamoto-is-most-likely-this-paypal-co-founder-770026e0360f" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">medium.com/@sahil50/satos…
ZXX
0
0
0
28
Sahil Gupta
Sahil Gupta@sahil5d·
Nakamoto was just 2008 Elon Musk. Objectively, he fit the Nakamoto profile. P2P payments, Windows C++, into Japanese culture, British spellings.
English
2
0
1
70
Charlie
Charlie@btc_charlie·
@MacnBTC Elon is satoshi
हिन्दी
20
0
38
34.7K
Documenting Saylor
Documenting Saylor@saylordocs·
WHEN ELON CONNECTED THE DOTS BACK TO SATOSHI NAKAMOTO Elon Musk once said Nick Szabo is “probably more than anyone else responsible for the ideas behind Bitcoin.” And Szabo? He once said “I designed Bitcoin.” Do you think Nick is Satoshi?
English
23
12
135
58K
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
𝕏 Money early public access will launch next month
English
15.6K
15.7K
157.9K
66.9M
Lunar Citizens
Lunar Citizens@LunarCitizens·
I think there’s a real possibility that Elon Musk could be Satoshi Nakamoto. He built Zip2 and PayPal, and creating Bitcoin requires skills in programming, cryptography, and payments—areas he clearly understands. Also, the name “Satoshi Nakamoto” is Japanese, and Musk has shown interest in Japanese culture. Most importantly, his vision aligns with decentralization—he doesn’t like being constrained by systems, and Bitcoin reflects that mindset.
English
2
1
5
149
Altcoin Daily
Altcoin Daily@AltcoinDaily·
Who do you think is Satoshi Nakamoto? 🤔
English
474
19
371
51.9K
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
@X4NWO Well, now that Satoshi Nakamoto has been discovered, I guess it is case closed ... :)
English
111
210
708
0
Sahil Gupta
Sahil Gupta@sahil5d·
@sahil50/satoshi-nakamoto-is-most-likely-this-paypal-co-founder-770026e0360f" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">medium.com/@sahil50/satos…
ZXX
0
0
0
62
Sahil Gupta
Sahil Gupta@sahil5d·
Nakamoto was just 2008 @elonmusk. P2P payments, Windows C++, into Japanese culture, British spellings.
English
1
0
1
222
Sahil Gupta
Sahil Gupta@sahil5d·
Question to Grok: Can you raise your intelligence and skepticism and refute every one of "Arguments that Elon is not Satoshi (the "con" side)"
Sahil Gupta tweet media
English
2
0
1
67
Sahil Gupta
Sahil Gupta@sahil5d·
The Big Coincidence of Fundamental Physical Constants raises the question, Is 13.8 billion years variable or constant?
Sahil Gupta@sahil5d

A message to anyone who cares for physics and cosmology and logic: All the fundamental constants cohere, even 13.8 billion years. In view of this Big Coincidence (an iteration of Dirac's large numbers hypothesis), What if 13.8 billion years is a constant – and not an age? What if 13.8 Gy isn't an age, and what if the universe doesn't have an age? Either [13.8 Gy is an age AND the Big Bang Theory is accurate AND this Big Coincidence does not hold or it does with h, c, or proton mass changing] xor [13.8 Gy is a constant AND the Big Bang Theory is inaccurate AND the physical constants are indeed constants and this Big Coincidence holds]. Logically, it's one xor the other. How can one check the validity of the Big Bang Theory? Compare its predictions of the contents of the far universe to what telescopes actually observe. What is observed? Highly developed galaxies. Is that what Big Bang Theory predicted? No. What next? What is the alternative? Debug the stack of claims. Find the bug and fix the bug. What is the bug? The false redshift explanation: that all galaxies recede or space expands. What is reality?: All galaxies are not receding. Space is not expanding. The redshift is merely and purely photons losing energy as they travel. How? At a rate modeled by E_t / E_0 = e^(-Ht), H being 1/(13.8 Gy). 13.8 billion years is not an age. It's a constant in the function that models the redshift.

English
1
0
2
48
Sahil Gupta
Sahil Gupta@sahil5d·
Relativity Theory is false because the Sun does not revolve around the Earth.
English
0
0
0
41
Sahil Gupta
Sahil Gupta@sahil5d·
@JohnCarreyrou There is someone who fits the Nakamoto profile better. Also a British-American personality, in his 50s, fascinated with Japan, connected to the Cypherpunks, proficient in C++, obsessed with digital money: Elon Musk. @sahil50/satoshi-nakamoto-is-most-likely-this-paypal-co-founder-770026e0360f" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">medium.com/@sahil50/satos…
English
1
1
1
1.1K
Adam Fisk
Adam Fisk@adamfisk·
The NYT says Adam Back wrote Bitcoin. The code says otherwise. I compared Bitcoin v0.1's actual source code against other top candidates across 12 stylometric traits — naming conventions, comment style, indentation, platform, class prefixes. Adam Back scores 1/12. He writes C, not C++ like Satoshi. He writes for Unix, not Windows like Satoshi. He also uses snake_case, tabs, and /* block comments */. Satoshi uses CamelCase, 4-space indent, // comments, and MFC-style C class prefixes. The closest match? A Gnutella P2P developer from Australia named Michael Stokes (11/12) who I got into lots of arguments with back in the Gnutella days over Gnutella protocol evolution. He used the exact same Windows MFC conventions, Hungarian notation, and even British English spellings in his code. Full analysis with downloadable source comparisons: whowrotebitcoin.com CC @robertgraham @nxthompson @JohnCarreyrou @dylfreed
Adam Fisk tweet media
English
1
1
4
362
Alex Waltz
Alex Waltz@raw_avocado·
Satoshi saying retarded. Do with this what you will.
Alex Waltz tweet media
English
46
15
392
58.2K