@PeterSchiff@saylor Peter, you're the piper for morons.
What's that like?
All you ever do is cherry-pick timelines. Meanwhile, $BTC has hammered gold over its lifetime.
What do you imagine is the top for an asset that can't cross borders freely and isn't finite?
The future is digital, you relic.
I don't shop at @Walmart, & it's a good thing because I'm noticing a trend here, & I don't believe in coincidences.
It's a safe bet employees are doing what they're told.
Markets swing, prices move… but true holders just chillax. 😌
Earn 2.0% APY on $BTC Lending till Nov 10 and let your #crypto work for you.
Start chillaxing with Bake today.
2 out of 3 people think 2026 will be a bear market where bitcoin crashes. But what if bitcoin continues its yearly doubling, from $20k to $40k in 2023, to ~$80k in 2024, possibly $160k end of 2025, $320k 2026, $640k 2027. Wouldn't surprise me..
BBB has passed, so the federal EV tax credit is ending on Sept 30, 2024. If you've been on the fence, get your Tesla orders in soon. Tesla could always raise the price if there's a big rush of orders.
3 months of free FSD when using my referral link to order: tesla.com/referral/david…
Waymo has a fleet of 1,500 cars, but Tesla can produce 1,500 cars with ~6 hours of production.
Waymo is confined to certain regions in certain cities, the Tesla will drive you anywhere.
Waymo is ugly, Tesla is beautiful.
Waymo took the shortcut to market, Tesla will win the market.
The $MSTY dividend depends on the volatility of $MSTR, which in turn depends on the volatility of $BTC — and that volatility is trending lower over time.
As $BTC volatility decreases, so will the dividend.
I would not rely on $MSTY for retirement income.
This is fake date. Unrealistic.
The X post by @ia_william claims that you can earn up to $23.12 per sale through affiliate marketing for products sold on Amazon, specifically in the electronics category priced over $100. However, this claim doesn't align with Amazon's affiliate commission structure, and I’ll break down why the $23.12 figure for a $100 product is incorrect based on standard rates.
### Amazon Associates Commission Rates
According to the Amazon Associates Program (as referenced in the web results and generally available data up to 2025), the commission rate for electronics is typically 3% of the product’s sale price. For a product sold at $100:
- Commission calculation:
$100 × 0.03 = $3
This means the affiliate earning for a $100 product in the electronics category should be $3, not $23.12 as claimed in the post.
### How Could the Post Claim $23.12 per Sale?
To earn $23.12 per sale at a 3% commission rate, the product price would need to be much higher. Let’s reverse-engineer the product price needed to achieve $23.12:
- Product price calculation:
$23.12 ÷ 0.03 = $770.67
So, a product would need to be priced at approximately $770.67 to generate a $23.12 commission at a 3% rate. The post mentions filtering for products over $100 but doesn’t specify that the example product generating $23.12 is priced at $770.67. This discrepancy suggests either:
1. Misrepresentation: The post inaccurately implies that a $100 product yields $23.12, which doesn’t match Amazon’s commission structure for electronics.
2. Different Commission Rate or Program: The $23.12 could reflect a different affiliate program with a higher commission rate, but the post explicitly mentions Amazon, and no evidence supports a 23.12% commission rate for electronics on Amazon.
3. Higher-Priced Product: The $23.12 commission might be for a more expensive product (like one costing $770.67), but the post’s context of filtering for products “over $100” creates confusion by not clarifying the exact product price.
### Additional Context from the Thread
The thread shows examples of products like the “Tribit Bluetooth Speaker” priced at $99, which at a 3% commission would yield $2.97, far from $23.12. Another image in the thread (Post: 1924434595778371922) highlights a commission of $23.12, circled on a graph, but doesn’t specify the product price tied to that sale. This lack of clarity further supports the idea that the $23.12 figure is misleading when paired with the $100 product context.
### Why the $100 Product Earning $23.12 is Incorrect
- Commission Rate Mismatch: A $100 product at Amazon’s 3% rate for electronics yields $3, not $23.12. To earn $23.12, the product would need to be priced at $770.67, which contradicts the $100 example.
- Potential Misleading Claim: The post may be exaggerating earnings to attract attention, a common tactic in affiliate marketing promotions. The PayPal screenshot showing $29,127.01 in 30 days further suggests inflated or unrelated earnings to make the method appear more lucrative.
- Alternative Explanation: If the $23.12 commission came from a different affiliate program with a higher rate (e.g., 23.12% commission on a $100 product), it might be plausible, but the post ties the method to Amazon, where such rates don’t exist for electronics.
### Realistic Earnings for a $100 Product
For a $100 product in the electronics category via Amazon Associates:
- Standard Commission: $3 (at 3%).
- Special Promotions: Amazon occasionally offers higher rates for specific events (e.g., as mentioned in the web results for Trade-In Events), but these are not standard for electronics and typically don’t reach 23.12%.
### Conclusion
The claim of earning $23.12 on a $100 product is not feasible under Amazon’s standard affiliate commission rates for electronics, which are around 3%, yielding only $3 per sale. The $23.12 figure likely corresponds to a much higher-priced product (around $770.67) or is an exaggeration.
honey, I've changed. Started to invest safely. Our life savings are invested in a Japanese restaurant called metaplanet
I've full ported this to give you a peace of mind.
Strategy has acquired 13,390 BTC for ~$1.34 billion at ~$99,856 per bitcoin and has achieved BTC Yield of 15.5% YTD 2025. As of 5/11/2025, we hodl 568,840 $BTC acquired for ~$39.41 billion at ~$69,287 per bitcoin. $MSTR $STRK $STRF strategy.com/press/strategy…