
Sandeep Todi
18.3K posts

Sandeep Todi
@sandeeptodi
Startup ecosystem & GTM leader | Community builder | Fintech, SaaS, Partnerships | 3x founder across US, Canada, India | DMs open for collabs, coffee, intros ☕




10 billion dollars in tax wasted trying and failing to make software that generates a CSV file with 450k rows in it twice a month.

Canada spent $5.1 BILLION fixing a broken payroll system (Phoenix). Now we're about to spend $4.2 BILLION+ replacing it with Dayforce. I went through every lobbying record, every communication report, and every revolving-door hire to identify potential conflicts of interest. Here's what I found. 1/🧵




Breaking: there’s a new way to move money! Today, we’re launching Payments, our integrated payment service provider (PSP) built to let teams move money easier than ever. For too long, teams building payment products have had to juggle fragmented vendors, slow bank integrations, evolving regulations, and infrastructure that needs to be rebuilt every time a new rail appears. Payments changes that. With one API, teams can: - Go live in days, not 6-12 months - Move money across ACH, wires, cards, RTP, FedNow, and stablecoins as first-class rails - Build with confidence, using built-in KYC/KYB and transaction monitoring - Scale forever by starting with our PSP and plugging in more banking partners overtime, without re-integrating All powered by the same orchestration, ledgering, and reconciliation software that’s already processed $400B+ in payments, with 99.99% uptime and 99% CSAT over the last six months. Our goal is simple: to be the forever payments platform for teams of all sizes, wherever they are on their journey. Ready to build payments products faster and scale without limits? Visit go.moderntreasury.com/4tZthxd to get started.

SaaS is dead. Finished. I vibe coded my very own newsletter platform in 4 minutes. My delivery rate went to zero & the paywall breaks daily. But I’ve saved $48 dollars & now just have to allocate all of my time to maintaining this. Checkmate.


there are many brilliant people at openai, but when I use some of the products (like codex web) it really feels like it wasn't made by people who actually do the thing you run into very weird states that shouldn't exist. the flows don't make much sense at all

AI is the great automator, and to automate, it must first imitate. The imitation fools people into thinking it’s alive.


I spoke to the Head of Finance for a Series B tech startup yesterday. He did a full AI show-and-tell & by the end it felt like he was going to bust through the screen like the Kool-Aid man. Some highlights from the call: 1. The first problem he attacked with AI was building a financial operating model for investors to raise their next round of funding. His process: Uploaded data room context from previous fundraise, had Claude ask clarifying questions, then iteratively built ARR waterfall and expense budget. He said he finished the model in 2 hours vs 1-2 weeks (without AI), and when I asked him about hallucination, his response was “once, and I don’t think it was the models fault.” 2. The next problem he tackled was on the customer success side. This company sells into large institutions, and “what’s the ROI” is constantly discussed on customer calls. He built a dashboard for clients that tracks incremental revenue (reported by customers), contract cost, and other important ROI metrics. He also made an internal version of this dashboard that notifies customer success when ROI dips below a certain threshold. 3. He took the ROI dashboard one step further and added a function that exports key metrics and charts from a customers dashboard into a brand-aligned QBR deck that is comprehensive and editable. 4. He brought up this concept of the AI stack I can’t stop thinking about. Traditionally, when you hire an executive, you don’t just hire them for their qualifications. You also hire them for their network, playbooks, and vendor preferences. The same thing will happen for ALL employees. When you hire someone in the future, you’ll hire them for their AI stack (their internal tools, workflows, and skills), which gives them leverage and edge. 5. He believes the painstaking task of month end close for a company’s financials can be taken from 10 days to 1 day with the right AI systems. 6. Every knowledge worker is turning into an engineer, and the way every knowledge worker approaches their work will look like the software lifecycle. This guy talked about his approach to building financial models with Claude, and it sounded exactly how my engineers build software. Context dump -> PRD -> master plan -> orchestrate/execute -> iterate 7. The best way to rebuild your company processes to be AI-native is NOT to ask employees for problems. It’s audit everything they do. Sit behind them as they work. Take a fine tooth comb to their calendar. Have them walk you through their most common workflows. Play offense not defense in AI-transformation. 8. Final project: he built a compensation management system by using Google Sheets app script macros generated by Claude Code. Its capabilities include system pulls from Rippling API and financial model for scenario planning, auto-generated presentation slides with compensation philosophy and individual comp details, createing permissioned folders for each manager with team-specific compensation documentation, and leveling band validation (flags out-of-band compensation. P.S. I spend half of my week talking to execs about how they use AI in their business. If you’re an exec and you’re afraid your company isn’t doing enough with AI, shoot me an email and my team will help create a list of clear AI opportunities specific to your business. alex@tenex[.]co

There is unlimited demand for intelligence.

Revenue chart from a recent investor update. Just don't die.




@tbpn @sonyatweetybird 100% agreed, and some of the others even have stronger defaults



