sat engineer

189 posts

sat engineer

sat engineer

@sat_engineer

i like bitcoin. i write code. freedom stack = @start9labs @BitcoinKnots @ocean_mining

Katılım Haziran 2025
1.3K Takip Edilen333 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
sat engineer
sat engineer@sat_engineer·
toxic bitcoin maxis scared off vitalik to go build his own chain and now eth is only 22% the market cap of bitcoin. bitcoin does less and is more valuable because having no features is the feature. Core vs Knots is not a tech problem. it's an economic problem.
English
1
0
4
651
sat engineer
sat engineer@sat_engineer·
@Gemini bc1qf38wcrx3rhjxl7t0dnt8ar8cmwnre6cqtlzjl3
sat engineer tweet media
Nederlands
0
0
0
61
Joe Winke
Joe Winke@joewinke·
@unclebobmartin Uncle Bob the challenge of handling more agents scales exponentially. Someone had to rethink the IDE - so I built JAT. It allows you to handle easily 10+ agents in an organized IDE with tasks, git, source, files, etc. github.com/joewinke/jat
English
1
1
4
1.7K
Uncle Bob Martin
Uncle Bob Martin@unclebobmartin·
I'm keeping two Claude windows open. One making changes to the source code. The other helping me to plan future changes. This uses my time better since I spend a lot less time waiting for Claude to finish. The two Claudes are in two different directories, both have git repos of the project. The planning directory has rules that prevent source code changes. Only planning is allowed. I manually pull and push changes between the two.
English
137
102
2K
574.6K
sat engineer
sat engineer@sat_engineer·
@bcherny love the product your team is building! it would be great if claude chrome could talk to claude code
English
1
0
0
758
Boris Cherny
Boris Cherny@bcherny·
👋 Hi I'm Boris and I work on Claude Code. I am going to start being more active here on X, since there are a lot of AI and coding related convos happening here. Feel free to tag me with Claude Code feedback or bug reports. Love to hear how y'all are using Claude Code, and what we can do to make it even better.
English
995
233
9.3K
1.2M
sat engineer
sat engineer@sat_engineer·
@start9labs @Atlas63573102 FreeGPT on StartOS hasn’t been updated since February. Any idea when the next update is? Umbrel seems to get updates as they come out
English
1
0
1
50
Start9
Start9@start9labs·
@Atlas63573102 FreeGPT (Ollama + Open Web UI) has wonderful UX. The problem is performance. The current hardware only allows for small models, and speeds are not great
English
2
0
4
103
sat engineer
sat engineer@sat_engineer·
@TheBTCBreakdown @shocknet_justin what don’t you agree about and why? just looking at spark and its single account, even if you trust the provider to delete the spending key, you give up a ton of privacy. seems like it gives you worse bitcoin for faster tx speeds than on chain
English
1
0
2
30
Justin (shocknet)⚡
Justin (shocknet)⚡@shocknet_justin·
Fake L2 scams like Ark, Spark, Citrea, Drivechains, and others are Shitcoins 2.0 The are exploiting the same incentive dilemma with Lightning that Bitcoin faced with Shitcoins 1.0 stacker.news/items/1272421/…
English
11
6
73
7.3K
sat engineer
sat engineer@sat_engineer·
@ReLeomerda @satellen3 good money is 1. a store of value (ie a safe) 2. a medium of exchange (people using it as money) 3. a unit of account (people measuring value with it)
English
1
0
0
7
TheSheepCat
TheSheepCat@ReLeomerda·
@satellen3 ignorance at its finest: - "We are using it as a store holder of wealth." - "Get paid for “doing stuff” on Bitcoin". Bitcoin isn't thought to be a "safe": if people don't use it, it will die cause miners will be starving.
English
1
0
0
45
Bob623
Bob623@Bobob623·
@satellen3 you make up a narrative. Bitcoin maximalist say: don't fucking touch Bitcoin, leave it alone. ossifier says, don't fucking touch Bitcoin this mean NO FUCKING FORK the only thing you'll achieve is creating a new shitcoin à la Roger Ver
English
2
0
4
48
Alex Gladstein 🌋 ⚡
Alex Gladstein 🌋 ⚡@gladstein·
@paulbrigner a) I think zcash is unnecessary and I think activists can achieve really good privacy in Bitcoin today using cutting edge tools and techniques without having to be someone else's exit liquidity b) I am evil
English
10
5
269
8.2K
Hammond of Texas | BIP-110🌽
Knots runners! OPEN port 8333 & fight spam more directly. Do it now. Accepting inbounds on Knots = Spam Killer Extraordinaire Outbound only nodes aren't slicing & dicing nearly as much.
English
28
27
155
12.4K
sat engineer
sat engineer@sat_engineer·
@saifedean deflation isn’t even always a bad thing. the classic gold era saw both deflation and quality of life increases. deflation is good when caused by productivity increases. bad when caused by collapsing credit markets
English
0
0
2
521
sat engineer
sat engineer@sat_engineer·
gold may not have lost those properties because it’s the cleanest shirt in the laundry, but other commodity based monies such as cattle and barley would have. humanity has tried a lot of different things before it settled on gold. something too scarce isn’t good money anymore. price signals would be ruined in a barley money based system if there was a famine. bringing it back to bitcoin, the blockspace is a consumable that can be used for non-monetary data. too much non-monetary use could make blockspace too scarce. it’s not just NFTs, it’s also video and music players that are being stored with ordinals. i imagine bitcoin’s steady state will be predominantly monetary usecases with some non-monetary usages similar to gold. fees are one way of deterring spammers and culture around what is the identity of bitcoin is yet another way to deter spammers. bitcoin core seems to be okay with the definition of bitcoin as a decentralized p2p blockchain protocol while knots supporters use a definition of money. 100kb op return by default is saying bitcoin welcomes arbitrary data on chain, which i don’t align with culturally. defaults matter a ton because most node runners won’t change them and these txs will be able to flow through the network easily
English
1
0
0
21
Rob Leder
Rob Leder@rleder·
Gold didn’t lose those properties because ancillary usage does nothing to diminish scarcity, fungibility, divisibility, and verifiability. It doesn’t matter if there are better conductors, corrosion-resistance makes it essential for unshielded contacts in circuitry. Mass amounts of it are also used by jewelers. The only truly non-monetary use for Bitcoin that I’m aware of is sticking data in blocks - typically jpegs. While this uses blockspace, and NFTs in general are a dumb concept IMO, it doesn’t choke out the monetary demand for or usage of Bitcoin itself. Ordinals, by definition, attach data to a single sat.
English
1
0
0
39
Asanoha
Asanoha@asanoha_gold·
Anyone saying they are not bringing Ethereum to Bitcoin is 100% lying to your face and gaslighting you.
Asanoha tweet media
Adrián Treviño@visionario_btc

@asanoha_gold Nobody is turning Bitcoin into Ethereum and its not the end of Bitcoin. This is straight up fear mongering,

English
14
22
144
6.3K
sat engineer
sat engineer@sat_engineer·
gold didn’t lose those properties because there are better conductors such as silver and copper. enabling the lightning network makes bitcoin better money. unfortunately it also introduced ordinals and inscriptions, so it appears to be a double edged sword. there’s not much info to go on in the screenshot but i have reservations about people wanting to “build everything” on top of bitcoin. feature creep can lead to diminishing monetary premiums. see ethereum
English
1
0
1
42
Rob Leder
Rob Leder@rleder·
Good money is scarce, fungible, divisible, verifiable. Gold lost none of those properties when it gained tangential use in electronics. Regardless, the enhancements to Bitcoin are not even tangential, they are to support monetary usage. Bitcoin did not lose any monetary properties when SegWit removed tx malleability and enabled the Lightning Network.
English
2
0
0
43