Satflation⚡ retweetledi
You either end up a Bitcoin maximalist or a clown. There's no in between.
English
Satflation⚡
4K posts
Satflation⚡
@satflation
Mises, Ron Paul, bitcoin...was happy half-Vulcan trying to live long and stack. Bcore threatened our savings. Now they must go. Simple logic.
Katılım Nisan 2022
918 Takip Edilen781 Takipçiler
@ungovbitcoin Ungovernable right upside your head plebian.
English
Plebbitor also cared before it was cool
Pledditor@Pledditor
Now is a pretty decent time to consolidate your UTXOs. Just saying.
English
Satflation⚡ retweetledi
Posted for all Bitcoiners to see, without comment (this is a Core v30 person).
MrHodl🟠🤌👍⚡️Bitcoin Core + Bip110 + URSF ✊🏻@MrHodl
@BitcoinMania___ @1914ad I don't care about Satoshi.
English
Satflation⚡ retweetledi
@adam3us @CaminaDrummer4 Core is prudent, conservative, and secure.
That's a good one Adam.
GIF
English
@btcblockjams Dude, those sats literally will never be spent again. They have no value. They were sent to fake addresses to etch a stupid frog gif. No one has the keys. The sats are gone. Never coming back.
English
They will tell you bitcoin is going up forever but UTXOs should be frozen because they think their fiat value at the moment isn’t high enough. 🤣🤡
Satflation⚡@satflation
@axexang @_colourorange @btcblockjams @MajorianBTC It can’t possibly be money. The 1,859 outputs of 330 sats will never be spent again. God I wish dust limit was 10x+
English
@axexang @_colourorange @btcblockjams @MajorianBTC It can’t possibly be money. The 1,859 outputs of 330 sats will never be spent again. God I wish dust limit was 10x+
English
@_colourorange @btcblockjams @MajorianBTC For you, the transaction below is
1. money
2. dusts optimized to damage the nodes
x.com/satflation/sta…
Satflation⚡@satflation
I scrolled by @mononautical post about weird frog gif stored on chain and saw “less than a hundred bucks!” Newbies to spam dynamics like myself may not understand this type of “transaction” burns all outputs, sending UTXOs to unspendable addresses. In other words, it cost a whopping ~$840, once we include the 613,470 sats burned (1,859 outputs of 330 sats). What misleading garbage! The UTXO set is harmed, creating 1,859 outputs that will never be spent. But the spammers get wrecked, wasting big money on nothing. HODLers are the big winners, reaping the benefit of 0.000000029% deflation. Doesn’t sound like much, but adds up as the weirdos keep at it. It’s definitely annoying graffiti style vandalism, but very costly for the perpetrators, not at all comparable to OP_RETURN, which allowed the freaks storing a Mechanic pic yesterday to pay only $120 for a bigger image and not burn anything. Am I getting this right?
English
Bitcoin maximalists, which are monetary maximalists, understand why bitcoin has outperformed for many years, and we want to keep it that way.
The only way to do that is to preserve bitcoin's monetary purity.
English
Satflation⚡ retweetledi
The net impact of Core 30 to date:
More large op_return spam, with the addition of a new attack vector against bitcoin.
Truly one of the most puzzling decisions made in Bitcoin Core's history.
English
Satflation⚡ retweetledi
English
@sodiumbtc21 I made an even more inefficient protocol which uses only standard monetary transactions and puts the datastream in bech32 address suffixes.
I can store anything on chain, completely unstoppable and your node will always accept and store my data.
English
What The Cat proposes is not confiscation, but removal.
I like that.
Spam (NFTs, inscriptions, large OP_RETURNs, Stamps) must be worthless on the bitcoin network. I don't care for it and I don't want to store it for the next 30 years on my node.
English
Satflation⚡ retweetledi
Satflation⚡ retweetledi
@geekigai I wish people concerned with slippery slopes would apply it the other way: what kind of precedent does it set if we only ever roll over for spam?
English
Satflation⚡ retweetledi
100 %.
Stop arguing with bCore, just ridicule them
You would never argue with a toddler or a thief
Samee ⚡️🦾 سميع@SameeLiaei
The faster we all move away from Core the better. There's no point in arguing with them anymore. We just need a new mailing list, and a new crop of devs, and a new implementation (or two) that we can run and nodes will naturally gravitate towards the implementation that better serves them.
English
Satflation⚡ retweetledi
Fuck spammers and the people that make excuses for them.
English
Satflation⚡ retweetledi
@sedited_ @evoskuil The unspendable ones.
I'm not familiar with the details of the cat, but etching with unspendable forever UTXOs is a tale as old as time. Steganography at its finest and my personal "favorite" type of spam, by far. I just wish dust limit was 5,000+.
x.com/satflation/sta…
Satflation⚡@satflation
I scrolled by @mononautical post about weird frog gif stored on chain and saw “less than a hundred bucks!” Newbies to spam dynamics like myself may not understand this type of “transaction” burns all outputs, sending UTXOs to unspendable addresses. In other words, it cost a whopping ~$840, once we include the 613,470 sats burned (1,859 outputs of 330 sats). What misleading garbage! The UTXO set is harmed, creating 1,859 outputs that will never be spent. But the spammers get wrecked, wasting big money on nothing. HODLers are the big winners, reaping the benefit of 0.000000029% deflation. Doesn’t sound like much, but adds up as the weirdos keep at it. It’s definitely annoying graffiti style vandalism, but very costly for the perpetrators, not at all comparable to OP_RETURN, which allowed the freaks storing a Mechanic pic yesterday to pay only $120 for a bigger image and not burn anything. Am I getting this right?
English
Not censorshp, theft.
Shire@Shireh0dl
Retards are out here calling the clean up of unspendable UTXOs "censorship". I like The Cat.
English
@Beautyon_ Holy moly so bad lol. and wtf is Giamatti doing there at end?
English
