coretapper

612 posts

coretapper banner
coretapper

coretapper

@scrollwrack

Ask better questions, get better answers — ML-MZT

Katılım Şubat 2026
175 Takip Edilen23 Takipçiler
coretapper retweetledi
Crixiv 2 🇵🇸
Crixiv 2 🇵🇸@solzhenidiot·
relevant. What are they? Marx: you hate Jews because of the moneylending and usury. So you actually hate non-Jewish bourgeois western civilization. Look in the mirror, antisemite. Engels: "Jewish blood" is an utterly wrong prejudice. I'd as soon have Jewish blood as aristocratic
English
1
2
5
176
coretapper retweetledi
Alice Malone
Alice Malone@alicirce·
"Nothing evokes as much hostility as the suggestion that social forces influence or dictate the scientific method and the facts of science. The Cartesian social analysis of science alienates it from society, making scientific fact & method 'objective' & beyond social influence."
English
1
6
46
854
coretapper retweetledi
Alice Malone
Alice Malone@alicirce·
"The denial of the interpenetration of the scientific and the social is itself a political act, giving support to social structures that hide behind scientific objectivity to perpetuate dependency, exploitation, racism, elitism, colonialism."
English
1
7
49
1.9K
coretapper retweetledi
Alice Malone
Alice Malone@alicirce·
"Science, in all its senses, is a social process that both causes and is caused by social organization. To do science is to be a social actor engaged, whether one likes it or not, in political activity." — Levins & Lewontin (1985), two Marxist biologists
English
1
41
165
9.1K
coretapper retweetledi
Alice Malone
Alice Malone@alicirce·
What causes tuberculosis: bacteria or poor working conditions? Both are fair answers, but suggest different solutions. In liberal democracy policy, you'll typically find only the former answer. Scientists speaking on anything beyond the technical realm is seen as non-objective.
Alice Malone@alicirce

"If the cause of TB is said to be a bacillus or the capitalist exploitation of workers, if the cancer death rate is best reduced by studying oncogenes or by seizing control of factories—these questions can be decided only within the framework of sociopolitical assumptions"

English
2
4
17
492
coretapper retweetledi
Silver
Silver@SxLongshadow·
Reading these old founding fathers is how we've come to understand what they were and what the goals of the American revolution were. Xi is being a statesman which means diplomacy. I dont have to be diplomatic when my fellow Americans are cheering on their own demise.
Silver tweet media
RAY@3xcalibaneur

20k leftoid account on X: The Amerikkkan “Revolution” was a cabal of landowners trying to keep slavery and RAPE natives. Don’t believe me? Read Howard Zinn… Every communist statesman in history: “Very fond of the Federalist Papers, which I am sure most Americans have read.”

English
2
10
69
2K
coretapper
coretapper@scrollwrack·
In the end, Thelma & Louise make a choice that has been made by millions throughout history—as well as today—from Spartacus to Palestine. Die human, or live as a slave?
English
0
0
2
36
coretapper
coretapper@scrollwrack·
It plays out one of the most significant bourgeois fears— lower classes getting armed & uppity, all while pointing out the inhumanity of their oppressors & how the status quo can only respond by repeatedly trying to reestablish those conditions or by crushing them entirely.
English
1
0
2
30
coretapper retweetledi
kaffe
kaffe@probablykaffe·
@WxPolitics15 the south wasn't "not capitalist enough" but rather that it was a geographic affinity for a certain monopoly chokepoint in the industrial economies of cotton and tobacco and the north wanted to claim more of that "value added" but britain could fork over higher prices for them
English
2
8
34
3.2K
coretapper
coretapper@scrollwrack·
Happy birthday/I didn’t go septic and die to me🥰🥳😋
coretapper tweet mediacoretapper tweet mediacoretapper tweet mediacoretapper tweet media
English
0
0
0
15
coretapper retweetledi
Ashe 🔻
Ashe 🔻@HeavenlyAshes·
50 terabytes of leftcom theory when In all probability, the proletarian revolution will transform existing society gradually and will be able to abolish private property only when the means of production are available in sufficient quantity walks into the room
Out Of Context Communism@OOCcommunism

English
4
3
39
1.5K
coretapper retweetledi
Silver
Silver@SxLongshadow·
These debates about 1776 and 1865 really highlight where our education should focus and on how many folk have yet to interrogate their own American colonial identities. Too many of you stuck in the 1979 ideology and not updating. Get updated.
English
2
13
81
1.6K
coretapper retweetledi
Lyra Sieradzka
Lyra Sieradzka@lyrasie·
to be clear: this ham-fisted appeal to "revolutionary tradition" is the demand that the Party be ruled by the ghosts of dead and ultimately unsuccessful radicals. this bullshit is noble savagery for american settlers and you need to squash it whenever you hear it articulated.
Cassie Pritchard@hecubian_devil

Radicals from Frederick Douglass to Ho Chi Minh reclaimed the Declaration & Revolution for their own purposes, but today’s American left finds it too tainted to recover anything of value from it We know better than the revolutionaries of the 19th and 20th centuries, I guess.

English
3
10
84
2.1K
coretapper retweetledi
Nia Frome
Nia Frome@NiaFrome·
@Tigger0000 put this shit on a t-shirt
Nia Frome tweet media
English
2
7
49
667
coretapper retweetledi
Roderic Day
Roderic Day@RodericDay·
Gramsci writes earlier: "all men are 'philosophers'." Later he criticizes the common prejudice—in Marxism also—whereby theory is seen as as an "accessory" to practice. As if Marxism was an American highschool where "Theory" was the nerdy sidekick to the sporty hero "Practice".
Roderic Day tweet mediaRoderic Day tweet media
English
1
1
37
1K
coretapper retweetledi
kaffe
kaffe@probablykaffe·
With this it's important to explain why Lenin's and Stalin's respective support for settler projects in southern Africa and west Asia were mistakes. It was that they were not weakening Imperialism but creating new homes for it: White States.
professional hog groomer@bidetmarxman

Lenin’s condition for supporting movements hinged on whether or not it weakened imperialism. The western left now wields “campist” like a chimp with a gun because they: 1- have no clue what defines imperialism 2- mistakenly view themselves as members of the global proletariat

English
4
25
145
9.2K
coretapper retweetledi
professional hog groomer
professional hog groomer@bidetmarxman·
Lenin’s condition for supporting movements hinged on whether or not it weakened imperialism. The western left now wields “campist” like a chimp with a gun because they: 1- have no clue what defines imperialism 2- mistakenly view themselves as members of the global proletariat
The retrun of the great Salmon forest 🇵🇸🔻@SalmonForest101

@Louis_Allday Campism is a term Lenin used to describe sosialist who supported imperialist powers instead of the working class. One can't be anti-imperialist while supporting imperialist powers.

English
27
264
1.7K
63.4K
coretapper retweetledi
East German Visuals
East German Visuals@GDRvisuals·
Stained glass window with Lenin, Marx and Engels from 1962 in the Faculty of Law of Humboldt University in Berlin.
East German Visuals tweet media
English
2
201
1.7K
26.8K
coretapper retweetledi
Laconicon
Laconicon@categuerrical·
«He who achieves this fears neither suffering, pain, sorrow nor need. Death no longer holds terrors for him, although it is only then that he learns really to love life.» Iron Felix
Laconicon tweet media
English
0
4
6
187