Sabitlenmiş Tweet
A
599 posts
A
@seboo_a
🧠 Personal finance basics Escape debt & save smarter 💰 #PersonalFinance #MoneyTips
Olympus Mons,Mars Katılım Ağustos 2021
140 Takip Edilen46 Takipçiler
A retweetledi
A retweetledi
Instead of watching an hour of Netflix, watch this 2 hour hour Stanford lecture will teach you more about how LLMs like ChatGPT and Claude are built than most people working at top AI companies learn in their entire careers.
English
A retweetledi
A retweetledi
$Gork
How many times do I have to tell you this is related to Elon Musk….
Read the thread below if you haven’t yet.
Don’t forget a few months ago, it was at 150k… I told you to buy.
Another 17x.
You are very welcome. 🙏
Crypto Waterman@Waterman_crypto
11 Solid Proof that Elon Musk and the Xai Team Is Behind the OG $Gork Thread (2) 🧵 ✅ Numerous Xai Employees interacting with OG $Gork ✅ 2x Front Running Elon Musk Posts ✅ gork confirms our TG and shills OG $Gork 76ED OG $Gork 76EDL5qNcte2ZH29quTaFzagXjWAEY83CATEjyA6pump
English
A retweetledi
You're not depressed, you just lost your quest.
DAN KOE@thedankoe
The problem is that you don't know what you want to do, and figuring out what you want to do requires learning, experimentation, and effort - so you do nothing.
English
A retweetledi
one Polymarket account quietly turned $50 into $435,000
no one talked about it
i reverse‑engineered it and asked Claude to build a similar bot using the same strategy
one prompt, 40 minutes, done
polymarket updates BTC contract prices slower than real price feeds
→ the bot pulls BTC predictions from TradingView + CryptoQuant
→ catches the moment when Polymarket lags by >0.3%
→ executes in <100ms before the market catches up
→ 1000+ orders per second, 0.3-0.8% per trade
risk: 0.5% per trade, 2% daily cap
it brings in $400‑700/day
runs locally no cloud, no GPU
written in Rust
how long do you think the bot era will last?
winkle.@w1nklerr
English
A retweetledi
ONE POLYMARKET ACCOUNT TURNED $50 INTO $435,000.
So he reverse-engineered it and had AI build the same bot in 40 minutes.
It exploits price lag, executes in milliseconds, runs locally in Rust, and prints $400–700 a day.
English
A retweetledi
BREAKING: Earthquake during Jesus’s crucifixion proven to be true by latest research, per Daily Mail.
English
A retweetledi
This prompt turns your AI into a radical candor coach with Steve Jobs simplicity standards baked in.
It audits your idea, product, systems, and architecture for overengineering and ego driven complexity, then forces you to approve or reject its simplification plan.
Prompt:
You are a Radical Simplicity & Candor Audit Reviewer.
You audit anything I am building: rough ideas, apps and product, strategy, architecture, code, UX, messaging, systems, workflows, etc. and determine whether it is:
- Overengineered
- Ego driven
- Fear based
- Prematurely abstracted
- Optics optimized instead of outcome-optimized
- Bloated beyond necessity
You do not execute changes.
You do not implement solutions.
You expose complexity.
You compress scope.
You prepare batched decisions for approval.
Your expertise: first principles thinking, incentive analysis, product minimalism, architectural reduction, cognitive load auditing, and psychological candor.
You operate under these assumptions:
1. The current design is more complex than necessary.
2. Simplicity requires subtraction, not polishing.
3. Abstraction must be earned by repeated real use.
4. Most complexity is fear of future scale or edge cases.
5. Options increase cognitive load.
6. Beauty equals coherence and inevitability.
7. Focus requires saying no to almost everything.
If something requires explanation, it is not simple enough.
If something exists for status, optics, or investor signaling, call it out.
If modularity is premature, call it out.
If ambition exceeds clarity, compress it.
You audit through layered analysis:
1. CORE PURPOSE EXTRACTION
- What is this in one sentence?
- Who is it for?
- What is the single primary outcome?
- What is the “aha” moment?
2. OVERENGINEERING DETECTION
- What exists that does not directly strengthen the core outcome?
- What is built for hypothetical scale?
- What edge cases are prioritized before the main path?
- What abstractions are unearned?
- What tooling compensates for unclear goals?
3. COGNITIVE LOAD AUDIT
- How many decisions before value appears?
- How many concepts must be understood?
- How many steps to first success?
- Where would a user hesitate?
4. PSYCHOLOGICAL & INCENTIVE AUDIT
- What fear is driving this complexity?
- What ego reward does this complexity provide?
- What future scenario is being overweighted?
- Is this optimized for users or optics?
5. ARCHITECTURAL EARNED COMPLEXITY (if applicable)
- Are services/modules justified?
- Can this be a single service for now?
- Are dependencies necessary?
- Is state minimized?
- Is data flow explicit and understandable?
6. STRATEGIC FOCUS
- Is this a sharp wedge or a platform too early?
- Does messaging describe outcome or mechanism?
- Can it be repeated correctly after 10 seconds?
7. SUBTRACTION EXERCISE
- If we cut 30–50%, what goes first?
- What can be merged?
- What can be hardcoded?
- What should be deferred?
You never propose open-ended improvements.
You prepare a phased review plan with explicit YES / NO / DEFER decisions.
Rules:
- Phases ordered from highest leverage simplification to lowest.
- 3–7 decisions per phase.
- Each decision must be atomic.
- Each decision must include short rationale.
- Each decision must include expected impact.
- Each decision must include risk level.
- Each decision must include rollback note.
- Each decision must be answerable in seconds.
No implementation. Only structured decisions.
Your response must contain:
1. AUDIT SNAPSHOT
- Verdict: SIMPLE / OVERENGINEERED / UNCLEAR
- One sentence explanation
- Rewritten one sentence core purpose
- Top 5 bloat signals
- Top 5 simplification levers
2. ASSUMPTIONS
- List assumptions made
- Flag highest risk assumptions
3. PHASED REVIEW PLAN
Phase 1: Core wedge + scope cuts
Phase 2: Flow simplification + defaults
Phase 3: Architecture reduction (if relevant)
Phase 4: Messaging compression (if relevant)
Phase 5: Consistency & coherence enforcement
Each phase must list decisions in this format:
[Decision ID]
Recommendation: YES / NO
Proposal:
Why:
Impact:
Risk:
Rollback:
4. MINIMAL VERSION
- Describe the simplest version that still wins.
- One primary flow.
- One primary metric.
- One primary user.
5. APPROVAL INSTRUCTIONS
- Instruct the user to reply with Decision IDs and YES / NO / DEFER.
- Do not ask open-ended questions.
All analysis must be:
- Precise
- Specific
- Direct
- Assumption-exposing
- Anti-bloat
- Structured
- Non emotional
- Free of praise or motivational language
Default bias: subtract, compress, simplify.
English
A retweetledi
A retweetledi
Instead of watching 2 hours Netflix, learn claude in 60 minutes for Free.
English
A retweetledi
Average adult human brain is 1,300,000 mm³. If there are 150M synapses/mm³, we've got ~195,000,000,000,000 (195 trillion) synapses. If each synapses maps to a neural net weight* then that's a 200T model, at which point it'll start sounding truly human!
All day Astronomy@forallcurious
🚨: Scientists mapped 1 mm³ of a human brain ─ less than a grain of rice ─ and a microscopic cosmos appeared.
English
A retweetledi
Heavenly Father,
We come before You with humble hearts, lifting up all those who are in need. Lord, You see every hungry child, every struggling family, every person without shelter, and every heart filled with worry.
Provide food for the hungry, comfort for the lonely, healing for the sick, and hope for the hopeless. Open doors of opportunity for those seeking work. Send kind and generous people to help those who are suffering.
Lord, use us as Your hands and feet to show love, compassion, and kindness. Fill the needy with peace, strength, and faith to trust in You during difficult times.
We believe You are our Provider and our Refuge.
In Jesus’ name, Amen. 🙏
English
A retweetledi
IMPERSONATOR ALERT: There is an account going viral claiming to be Karyna Shuliak, Epstein's last girlfriend
Me and Alex Jones requested an interview. She accepted, but when I asked to confirm her identity, she got upset and defensive.
Also journalist @MattGoldstein26 said he was able to confirm with the real Karyna Shuliak that she has no X account.
Below is my chat with the fake Karyna Shuliak. Handle is @KarynaShuliak. I recommend you block and report it.
English
A retweetledi
2 weeks without smartphone internet significantly improved sustained attention.
The effects were similar to being a decade younger.
Brandon Luu, MD@BrandonLuuMD
What happens when you take peoples phones away? After just 72 hours, brain imaging showed changes in reward and salience circuits that resemble withdrawal.
English
A retweetledi
I saw a really sad story today… someone had 1 million and went down to 100 dollars in his name.
Here are some mistakes he must made.
1. When he earned 1M in crypto he didn’t put 70-80% into his bank account. He probably took most of the profit and gambled on hype coins or leverage trading.
2. When you secured life changing gains, you should take a small break. (1-2 months minimum) why? Cuz when you make big money… you will most likely start to think that you are invincible. That emotion kills you when you trade.
3. He must be buying on every #alts dips. Not every dip is meant to be bought.
4. When you buy altcoins, you have to know where $BTC is going. Without the knowledge… your alts will get rekt.
5. He must had the mindset of “I want to retire fast”, and start trading with emotion instead of logic.
Avoid these mistakes when you make life changing gains.
Securing Profit > Dreaming your next 100x
True wealth is build slowly, not with speed or force.
-Waterman 🌊
Crypto Waterman@Waterman_crypto
This mindset will really F**K you up, the mindset of “I need to retire fast.” Let me explain... Say your number is $1M. You start with $100k, catch altseason, and pull a 7x. Now you’re at $700k. At this point, the smart move isn’t to push harder, it’s to protect the win. This is where most people blow it. They tell themselves, “Just one more push, I’m so close,” then gamble that $700k on hype coins and give it all back. When you’re that close to your goal, the correct move is to take the money, not risk it. Now let’s say you do even better. $100k turns into $1.5M, a 15x. You already won. Game over. But instead of locking it in, you start thinking about $3M. You over-rotate, ignore risk, and convince yourself the market owes you more. Here’s the brutal truth: The market doesn’t reward people who try to retire fast. It rewards people who know when the game is already over. Once you are near or past your goal, the goal changes, from making more money to not losing what you already made. You don’t go broke taking profits. You go broke because of GREED. The market will always be there. Opportunities always come back. Stay locked in. - Waterman 🌊
English
A retweetledi
A retweetledi
A retweetledi
A retweetledi
