English
Seth Schroeder
2.8K posts
@sethschroeder @mrjohncook @SouthwestAir Sharing my experience and stating facts about their seat policy. Like I initially said you always have choices and you exercised it. 👍🏾
English
Lame that @SouthwestAir now charges me to select a seat for my 5 year old. An additional $60 just so he can sit next to his dad on a 3.5 hour flight??
English
@BernieSanders @grahamformaine You are established and not doing anything
English
On our way to Bangor, Maine for a rally with @grahamformaine.
The crises facing our country are too serious for establishment politics and tinkering around the edges.
We need candidates like Graham who will take on the greed of the oligarchs and deliver for working families.
English
@TresCaminos7 @mrjohncook @SouthwestAir You a southwest fan boy?
To be clear
I have flown triple digit flights with Southwest. Their benefits are gone for long time and first time flyers.
I moved to an actual primary airline that also deals international.
You defending them is cringe.
English
@sethschroeder @mrjohncook @SouthwestAir They told everybody at least 9 months prior that they were going to charge for seats and when
English
@TresCaminos7 @mrjohncook @SouthwestAir Yes so its a good thing people are calling these issues out so people realize they likely need to opt for a different choice.
Additionally normally you improve service then charge for it. Not charge for some magical future state you might never actually deliver fully on.
English
English
@TresCaminos7 @mrjohncook @SouthwestAir Lol sorry that Southwest isn't what it once was.
Also they can charge for seats when their aircraft are of the same quality as others.
They are fine but they are a budget airline trying to parade as premium.
English
@mrjohncook @SouthwestAir Everybody charges for seats. Get over it. Publicly whining won't change anything
English
English
@espnhomer dumb question
They say each time a batter faces a pitcher they get better.
Is it worth pitching only your bottom end rotation against LA now to save the looks against our best?
English
@hbomb4333 @Johnny_Barks Well then Bart Star is better than Elway I guess since Star won more in the playoffs.
English
@Johnny_Barks 0-4 in playoffs versus Jimmy G & Colin Kaepernick. Numbers don’t lie
English
It’s a fun debate on here but Aaron Rodgers will end his career with nearly double the passing touchdowns and half the interceptions as John Elway. Numbers don’t lie.
English
@_King_Beast_ @Dexerto Yes because this will really stop the cheaters... meanwhile you are giving full control of your device over to them.
Pass and already passed when this became a requirement.
English
@Dexerto People are actually mad about this. Fuck the cheaters lol
English
@CheeseGalaxy3 @Peach_Fightr OH sorry I was confused. You are giving complete control over your machine to a company and still to face cheaters.
I couldn't your take up if I tried in the past.
English
@sethschroeder @Peach_Fightr From the company’s POV it’s still a win since it means that only the portion willing to push through are cheating instead of half the playerbase.
Nobody ever promised zero cheaters, and yes one should be more discerning about who they hand control over their PC to.
English
Riot casually gloating that they put a malware that can brick your PC if they feel like it
Riot Games@riotgames
congrats to the owners of a brand new $6k paperweight
English
@EvoR6S @OwletB93 @Peach_Fightr Okay fine then the Casino owner takes the tires off and puts them on top of their casino for you to retrieve.
Better?
Its crazy you are trying to defend this. When in the end cheaters will just go back to cheating....
English
@sethschroeder @OwletB93 @Peach_Fightr No, because nothing gets stolen. Just reinstall your OS. Are you this openly stupid all the time or just today?
English
@CheeseGalaxy3 @Peach_Fightr The people who are willing to push through the friction are the ones who highly likely are the issue for you as a heads up.
Also I thought this was supposed to make zero cheaters and why you handed over the keys to your PC to that company?
English
@sethschroeder @Peach_Fightr It’s not going to stop everybody, but anything that increases friction narrows the funnel and makes it too much trouble for some percentage of former cheaters. That’s the principle upon which anti-cheat operates.
English
@ThatOneTakuma @Peach_Fightr Banning a device vs bricking a device are different things.
Also zero shot any cheat detection is 100% accurate ever. Which is why the reg level access is dumb.
Then add in cheaters will still get around this and keep cheating...
I uninstalled LOL when it rolled out.
English
@Peach_Fightr Hardware banning has been a thing for ages. Maybe don't join a large scale cheating operation if you value your hardware!
English
@CheeseGalaxy3 @Peach_Fightr Guess what people who want to cheat will get around this. People defending this even said you can literally just reinstall the OS with some registry edits.
So in other words you are not even stopping people who want to cheat while having reg access to non-cheaters.
English
@Peach_Fightr To be clear I’m not proponent of draconian anti-cheat/DRM/etc, quite the opposite, but it should also be acknowledged that the only reason it came to this is because a handful of fuckers will go to any length to cheat.
Yes, get angry at riot, but also get angry at the cheaters.
English
@EvoR6S @OwletB93 @Peach_Fightr Oh so its like the casino owner stealing your tires.
Oh and best part its like saying someone is card counting. While you can be 99% sure you can't be 100% sure and someone could be caught incorrectly.
You just gotta put new tires on it.
English
@OwletB93 @Peach_Fightr Even then it’s not bricked. You just need to reinstall your OS. It bricks the DMA firmware essentially.
English
@EvoR6S @Peach_Fightr Sorry but there is no chance it 100% without question is accurate every single time.
Which is why normal anti-cheat where its a single game is fine but system wide access is bad on top of giving that company full access over your machine essentially on top of it.
English
@Peach_Fightr You missed the part where it will not brick your PC unless you are a DMA cheater.
English
@tufpraise It's just possible she was not sentenced or even convicted.
Additionally don't threaten people online should be the take away.
You can easily call out the massive issue without the threat.
English
so they can give a woman 15 years in prison for WORDS against a corporation but when men stalk and verbally harass and threaten women there's "nothing they can do about it until he actually attacks you"
ً@tufdaxx
NEW: Florida woman breaks down in tears after she became the first Luigi Mangione copycat to be arrested. Briana Boston, a 42-year-old mother of three, was arrested for making threats to BlueCross BlueShield over a rejected medical claim. The woman, who is now facing up to 15 years in prison, allegedly quoted Mangione, saying, "Delay, Deny, Depose. You people are next." This was a similar message that Mangione left on his bullet casings. The woman told investigators that "healthcare companies played games and deserved karma from the world because they are evil," adding that she was inspired by the recent news cycle. Boston was charged with threats to conduct a mass sh**ting or act of terrorism. Her bond was set at $100,000. She faces up to 15 years behind bars.
English