Sevik

298 posts

Sevik banner
Sevik

Sevik

@Sevik

UK. Continuing to be a disappointment. #wwfc

UK Katılım Temmuz 2018
325 Takip Edilen45 Takipçiler
Sevik
Sevik@Sevik·
@Padday "Beautify this slide" 😂
English
0
0
0
1
Paul Adams
Paul Adams@Padday·
The most annoying thing on the entire internet right now
Paul Adams tweet media
English
4
0
14
4.1K
Sevik
Sevik@Sevik·
@miggi @figma Can you confirm what training data was used? Thanks.
English
0
0
0
15
miggi from figma
miggi from figma@miggi·
A thread of @figma agent prompt examples / screen recordings I helped bring to life to get you started on automations (with 🎵 made on my OP-XY): 🧵 1.) Explore design directions Prompt: Give me 3 style options for this design, one that's organic, one modern, and one retro.
English
13
28
305
29.8K
Alex Socoloff
Alex Socoloff@socoloffalex·
Another day where Twitter designers are claiming they invented basic things. Now it’s fucking PowerPoint presentation layouts. What’s next, they’re gonna start crying about business card layouts? Jesus Christ 🤦🤦‍♀️🤦‍♂️
English
8
0
28
1.7K
ChatGPT
ChatGPT@ChatGPTapp·
Have you ever thought to yourself: I really don't want to make this PowerPoint. Good news: ChatGPT can now create and edit presentations directly in PowerPoint. Build, update, understand, and polish presentations directly in PowerPoint while keeping slides editable. Now in beta, we’d love your feedback 👀
ChatGPT tweet media
English
158
236
3.1K
254.2K
Sevik
Sevik@Sevik·
@ChatGPTapp I'd rather lick a toilet seat than present that to a client.
English
0
0
0
75
Sevik
Sevik@Sevik·
@kilocode Boring as fuck. Derivative and no different from spinning a site out of a bootstrapped framework. Cost: $0.14. And it shows.
English
1
0
0
355
Kilo
Kilo@kilocode·
Grok Build 0.1 might be one of the most underestimated AI models right now. We tested it in Kilo Code by asking it to build 5 websites from scratch. Here are the results:
English
83
75
1K
4.9M
Sevik
Sevik@Sevik·
@DJ_CURFEW Sounds like a terrible place to work.
English
0
0
0
5
Zeb Evans
Zeb Evans@DJ_CURFEW·
Today we reduced headcount by 22%. The business is the strongest it's ever been. So I think it's important to be direct about what I'm seeing and why. First, I made this decision and I own it. I did it because the way to operate at the highest level of productivity is changing, and to win the future, ClickUp needs to change with it. Second, this wasn't about cutting costs. Most savings from this change will flow directly back into the people who stay. We'll be introducing million-dollar salary bands. If you create outsized impact using AI, you'll be paid outside of traditional bands. Most importantly, I have the deepest gratitude for those affected. We're doing this from a position of strength specifically so we can take care of people properly. Everyone affected receives a package aimed at honoring their contributions and easing the transition. I only see two options: wait for this to play out gradually in the market or be honest about what I'm seeing and act proactively. THE 100X ORGANIZATION The primary change is that we're restructuring around what I call 100x org. The goal is 100x output. The roles required to build at the highest level are fundamentally different than they were a year ago. Incremental improvements to existing systems won't get us there. We need new ones. That means creating enough disruption to rebuild rather than iterate on what's already broken. The common narrative is that AI makes everyone more productive. It doesn't. Many of the workflows of today, if left unchanged, create bottlenecks in AI systems. These roles will evolve. But waiting for that to happen naturally means falling behind now. The 100x org is actually heavily dependent on people - infinitely more than today. This is only possible with 10x people that have embraced and adopted new ways of working. THE BUILDERS, AGENT MANAGERS, AND FRONT-LINERS — THE BUILDERS: 10X ENGINEERS I don't think most companies have internalized what's actually happening with AI in engineering. The common narrative is that AI makes all engineers more productive. That may be true in isolation, but at an organization level - that is the farthest thing from reality. Here's what we've validated recently at ClickUp: the great engineers, the ones who can orchestrate, architect, and review, are becoming 100x engineers. They're not writing code. They're directing agents that write code. The skill is judgment. AI makes the best engineers wildly more productive, and everyone else using AI slows these engineers down. Think about it - the bottlenecks are (1) orchestration - telling AI what to do, and (2) reviewing - what AI did. Everything is leapfrogged and no longer needed. So who do you want orchestrating and reviewing code? And how do you want your best engineers to spend their time? If your best engineers are spending time reviewing other people's code, then this is inherently an inefficient bottleneck. These engineers can review their agent's code much faster than reviewing human code. The new world is about enabling your 10x engineers to become 100x. The wrong strategy is to push every engineer to use infinite tokens. Companies doing this are celebrating 500% more pull requests. But customer outcomes don't match the volume of code being generated. I call this the great reckoning of AI coding, and every company will face this soon if not already. More code is just another bottleneck to the best engineers, and ultimately to your company's impact as well. — THE BUILDERS: 10X PRODUCT MANAGERS Product management and design roles are merging. Designers that have customer focus, become more like product managers. And product managers that have intuition for UX become more like designers. The bottleneck of user research is gone. It takes us just one mention of an agent to kickoff research and analyze results. The bottleneck of product <> design iteration is also gone. The product builder iterates on their own, along with agents and skills that ensure alignment with quality and strategy. Also controversial today - I believe that the wrong strategy is to have your PMs shipping code - that just introduces another bottleneck that the best engineers will waste their time on. To be clear, PMs should be coding but they should do this in a playground to iterate, validate, and scope. That code should not go to production. Everything outside of managing systems, orchestrating AI, and reviewing output becomes a bottleneck. That's why the other roles that are critical along with these are the systems managers (to reduce bottlenecks) along with a bottleneck you can't replace - customer meeting time. — THE SYSTEM MANAGERS Ironically, the people that automate their jobs with AI will always have a job. They become owners of the AI systems - agent managers. We have many examples of these people at ClickUp. The underlying systems in which we operate are absolutely critical to get right. I think most companies are delusional to think they can iterate on existing systems and compete in this new world. You must create enough disruption so that old systems are deprecated entirely. If there's any definition for 'AI native' that's what it is. — THE FRONT-LINERS In a world that will become saturated with AI communication, the human touch will matter more than anything to customers. This is a bottleneck that you shouldn't replace - even when agents are high enough quality to do video meetings. One-on-one meeting time with customers is something that shouldn't be automated. The systems around the meetings should be - so that front-liners spend nearly 100% of their time with customers. REWARDING 100X IMPACT In a world where companies are able to do so much more with less, where does that excess money go? In our case, much of the savings in this new operating model will flow directly back to those that enabled it. We must reward people that create productivity accordingly. This aligns incentives on both sides. Plus, in a world where your best people create 100x impact, you can't afford to lose them. You should aim to retain these employees for decades. The context they have and their ability to efficiently orchestrate and review will be nearly impossible to replace. Compensation bands of today should be thrown out the door. We're introducing $1 million cash/year salary bands with a path available to nearly everyone in the company if they produce 100x impact by creating or managing AI systems. THE FUTURE Nearly every company will make changes like these. The ones that do it proactively will define what comes next. The future is not fewer people. It's different work, new roles, and better rewards for those who embrace it. We're already seeing entirely new roles emerge, like Agent Managers, that didn't exist a year ago. ClickUp is positioning to lead this shift, not just internally, but for our customers too. I've never been more certain about where we're headed.
English
1.3K
915
10.4K
5.2M
Sevik
Sevik@Sevik·
@Variety Almost time to go back to old fashioned music piracy instead
English
0
0
0
129
Variety
Variety@Variety·
Spotify is launching a new tool allowing fans to create “responsible” AI-generated covers and remixes of their favorite songs from participating artists and songwriters. The new tool will launch as a paid add-on for Spotify Premium users, creating an additional source of income for artists and songwriters. variety.com/2026/music/new…
Variety tweet media
English
114
62
186
137.4K
Nehmat Gereige | AI-Design Professor
I totally agree. This was my take on this release. I demo the difference. This specific release empowers designers and is for designers. Other tools are created by developers to replace what we do. Figma Design Agent Just Launched | AI Vector Agent Inside the Design Canvas! youtu.be/ZljQ6SYj8Rw
YouTube video
YouTube
English
1
0
0
235
Shashi (シャシ)
Shashi (シャシ)@shashpicious_·
one good thing about figma vs other tools is that figma is actually standing with designers and trying to empower them with ai. meanwhile there are tools out there claiming to replace designers by producing slop. they don't know the power of human + ai. it's just a matter of time. they'll be gone as quick as they went viral.
Figma@figma

wdym of course there’s an agent right on the design canvas that’s fluent in Figma and native to the way your team works

English
5
8
126
8.2K
Evan Yang🕶️
Evan Yang🕶️@yyf1213·
Finally… I can just tell Gemini “Budget AUD 800, get me a full summer travel outfit that doesn’t look terrible” and the Universal Cart just checks out 😂 Google’s agentic commerce push with UCP + AP2 looks promising. This could actually make shopping lazy in the best way. #GoogleIO
English
1
0
0
368
Google
Google@Google·
We’re building a foundation for agentic commerce. Here’s how ⬇️ 1️⃣ Universal Commerce Protocol, an open-source standard that allows all the key players to work together by giving agents and systems a common language. 2️⃣ Agent Payments Protocol (AP2), so your AI agent can securely make payments on your behalf, with boundaries and accountability. 3️⃣ Universal Cart, an intelligent shopping cart and your new hub for shopping on Google #GoogleIO
Google tweet media
English
29
47
253
33.8K
Sevik retweetledi
Sevik
Sevik@Sevik·
@JClarkeatDell The only thing abundant here is the number of times I've seen this shit advert.
English
0
0
0
2
Jeff Clarke
Jeff Clarke@JClarkeatDell·
Abundant intelligence is here. Michael set the tone today — AI is leaving the screen to solve the world’s toughest challenges.
English
295
133
1.8K
8.3M
Sevik
Sevik@Sevik·
"AI native" has to be the weirdest, most pathetic flex ever.
English
0
0
0
11
Sevik
Sevik@Sevik·
@guiseiz Sooo... What data did you train it on?
English
0
0
0
227
guiseiz
guiseiz@guiseiz·
Design agents on the canvas opens up so many doors for how we design and build products. The first step is having agents that meet you where you are, and design with you. I’m so stoked for the countless of figmates who put so much into this. Over a year training our own models and hillclimbing on quality. Truly a labour of love. See you in the Beta :)
Figma@figma

wdym of course there’s an agent right on the design canvas that’s fluent in Figma and native to the way your team works

English
18
20
276
37.6K
Sevik
Sevik@Sevik·
@Google There won't be much point in building websites if all you're going to do is serve the content directly on your force-fed AI search engine ecosystem.
English
0
0
0
39
Google
Google@Google·
Building a modern website can take a lot of specialized knowledge. So, we’re introducing an early preview of Modern Web Guidance at #GoogleIO.🌐 It's a new set of skills that gives AI agents a blueprint for modern web development, helping them build high-quality features across many use cases.
Google tweet media
English
5
13
104
20.8K
Sheri
Sheri@rhubarb2975·
@NOW @NOWHelpTeam there is an issue when I try to open my now tv, it is telling me there “Something went wrong” can I have some support to solve this issue
English
2
0
0
283
Sky News
Sky News@SkyNews·
The scribes of medieval Europe and AI coding: Is there a connection between the two? Anthropic's Head of Claude Coding seems to think so. Technology correspondent @rowlsmanthorpe asked Boris Cherny to explain. More science and tech stories: trib.al/xbkTQ4w
English
15
2
16
17.2K
Sevik
Sevik@Sevik·
@Google And to think I respected you.
English
0
0
0
52
Google
Google@Google·
How information agents work in Search: 1️⃣ Start with a total brain dump of what you want your agent to keep you updated on 2️⃣ The agent will break down your complex question and map out a plan 3️⃣ It will determine the urgency — understanding that you need in-the-moment intel 4️⃣ The agent sets triggers to look out for information as it changes and picks the tools it needs for the job 5️⃣ It sends you an intelligent synthesized update along with links across the web, with the ability to take action #GoogleIO
English
32
54
357
117K
Sevik
Sevik@Sevik·
@NaviMeJP Ramen with a big serving of ai slop.
English
0
0
0
3
NaviMe
NaviMe@NaviMeJP·
The best ramen spots in Japan are known by locals. NaviMe connects you with a real local guide who'll take you there.
English
3
10
48
387.7K