
Steve Hare
5K posts

Steve Hare
@sharemath
Math-Whisperer. Creator of https://t.co/YTkPUsp7ve.








There’s something wrong with this letter from one of my former 7th grade students: “I’m going to be honest, I was really bad at math up until this year. I mean, I didn’t even understand multiplication in fifth grade. That’s saying a lot, considering this year I’m doing insane things like graphing, finding medians, and even scientific notations. I’ll go home and try to teach my dad some things that I’ll find simple, like box plots. He won’t understand any of it then I’ll sit there all confused because of how easy I think it is. You’ve taught me so much and I’m so appreciative of that.” What’s wrong with it? I didn’t teach her at all that year, not even once. She completely taught herself, day after day, with pencil and paper, and not a screen in sight. That was the year I first put my You Teach You math method to the test in the classroom, and she used the “examples for everything,” the related practice problems, and the fully-completed answer key on the back of each page to master even the trickiest concepts in the 7th grade curriculum, and to pull herself up from “Partially Proficient” at the beginning of the year to “Advanced Proficient” and into Algebra I the next. (I was available to her at all times of course—in the role of what I call “the sage at the side”—but she only asked for help once, and figured out her own mistake before I managed to get to the end of my explanation.) People here on eduTwitter tend to be skeptical of the idea of students teaching themselves math—and they're right to be. I wasn’t sure the materials could do it without me either! But that year, student after student after student—132 in all—showed me otherwise. And why shouldn’t they be able to? Kids learn to speak by hearing example after example and trying out their theories with feedback from the environment. Math is no different. The brain doesn't need to be told the rules before it can learn them—it needs examples clear enough to see the pattern, and feedback immediate enough to correct the theory. The full k-8 series I developed since then gives students both: a visual example for every single concept and a feedback loop that closes in seconds, not days. That's not a new idea. It's how human beings learn everything. And now it's how anyone can learn math. Learn more at YouTeachYou.org

I’m thinking the distinction between skills we learn “naturally” and “artificial” skills like reading that we have to be explicitly taught by teachers is overblown or wrong Our brains use the same mechanism to learn both The real difference is (probably) just that the environment is naturally set up to teach babies how to talk — it’s not set up to teach 5 year olds how to read

@sharemath When I was ~13 I had an apple ][ computer and many programs came with the code there for you to see. Seeing what a program did, seeing the code that did it, then doing my own, it was a very similar learning method. When I got you teach you math for my son, same thing played out

The #1 problem/weakness in teaching and how to address it. teacherhead.com/2019/10/04/the… via @teacherhead














