shart

1.4K posts

shart

shart

@shartstate

a cuppa a day keeps the red candles away

Katılım Şubat 2021
869 Takip Edilen311 Takipçiler
hoeflator/滥交师傅 (Yishun Kampung mode)
Singapore will continue to face a housing crisis as long as we prop up the belief that house = wealth. A politician and leader of this nation that actually CARES for the extension and continued prosperity of this tiny island would tell every single overlevered sinkie in the market to either start cashing out or accept losing assets (that they never owned, the bank did) and to push the population to instead reallocate savings and capital into the local stock market. The issue is we are caught in a hypnosis where the government knows that the BTO lottery keeps the cattle happy when tuberculosis is beginning to touch the outskirts of the population. Land scarce? We are not scarce on land, we are scarce on ENERGY. We must build MULTIPLE nuclear reactors on the island before the rest of the world enters WW3. Energy independence. Mutually assured destruction if bloodlust reaches our neighbors. Bitter respect from the mainland and Japan. Sinkie superpower. Energy becomes so cheap we can finance air conditioning for the majority of the population and raise the IQ levels a whole SD up. Continue to allow the hiding of dirty money from Asia (we should add Russia and Europe into this) while giving pure socialism to the local/PR population. Two tier society for expats and locals but the locals are given housing, slop and stability. With free energy we would be able to create gigantic glass ceiling complexes that range kilometres wide. We would create an artificial microclimate like Hawaii. We would plant forests that preserve the rarest flora from across the globe - more tourism. We would reclaim another island the size of Singapore before Msia secedes JB to us. We could fund the creation of a floating city above Singapore itself, like we once had before Younger Dryas event that stole everburning lamps and the elixir of life from our collective consciousness. We could have so much prosperity that every single citizen has an iron rice bowl that never cracks. We would have Merdeka once more.
The Straits Times@straits_times

Building taller: The rise of HDB blocks above 40 storeys in land-scarce Singapore bit.ly/4bIiFdz

English
26
20
249
28.9K
shart
shart@shartstate·
@FangYi11101 bruh they are just farming the morons paying absurd prices to live in an abandoned real estate development
English
0
0
0
42
shart
shart@shartstate·
@FinnMurphy12 100% true although I doubt revolution begins before many many years of economic malaise in the non asset owner class
English
0
0
1
11
Finn Murphy
Finn Murphy@FinnMurphy12·
lol Block/Square stock is up like 20% on laying off 40% of their headcount while growing and profitable. The Faustian bargain that big tech made with society was by creating a nuevoaristocracy of laptop-class landed gentry, their founders and shareholders were allowed to become wealthy beyond all imagination with little government intervention past slaps on the wrist. Google could cut 90% of the headcount and generate 90% of the revenue. But when this deal is broken, the displaced Baron’s will demand their own Magna Carta - tech leaders are too politically myopic to see this and so the more likely outcome is one of revolution. A rising of modern sans-culottes currently kept busy by the bread and circus’ of Doordash and TikTok but rallied to action by these displaced elites. AI may be the excuse but this has always been an option. Salesforce employs 75,000 people. Including Matthew McConnaughey on over $1,000,000.00 a year. Most of this headcount can hit the road - Covid proved many jobs are ritualistic button pressing exercises in a circular loop of keep up appearances financed by a need for elite docility. AI’s biggest disruption may be giving people the ‘excuse’ to finally break this pact. But I assure you the Maximilien Robespierre of today is not a puffed up perfumed Frenchmun. He’s a forty year old Stanford educated father of 4 who contributed to the Review about to lose his director role in Big Tech and enter the worst job market since the financial crisis. He will likely be equally as unforgiving if executives are not careful about how they carry themselves and their decisions in this coming shift.
jack@jack

we're making @blocks smaller today. here's my note to the company. #### today we're making one of the hardest decisions in the history of our company: we're reducing our organization by nearly half, from over 10,000 people to just under 6,000. that means over 4,000 of you are being asked to leave or entering into consultation. i'll be straight about what's happening, why, and what it means for everyone. first off, if you're one of the people affected, you'll receive your salary for 20 weeks + 1 week per year of tenure, equity vested through the end of may, 6 months of health care, your corporate devices, and $5,000 to put toward whatever you need to help you in this transition (if you’re outside the U.S. you’ll receive similar support but exact details are going to vary based on local requirements). i want you to know that before anything else. everyone will be notified today, whether you're being asked to leave, entering consultation, or asked to stay. we're not making this decision because we're in trouble. our business is strong. gross profit continues to grow, we continue to serve more and more customers, and profitability is improving. but something has changed. we're already seeing that the intelligence tools we’re creating and using, paired with smaller and flatter teams, are enabling a new way of working which fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a company. and that's accelerating rapidly. i had two options: cut gradually over months or years as this shift plays out, or be honest about where we are and act on it now. i chose the latter. repeated rounds of cuts are destructive to morale, to focus, and to the trust that customers and shareholders place in our ability to lead. i'd rather take a hard, clear action now and build from a position we believe in than manage a slow reduction of people toward the same outcome. a smaller company also gives us the space to grow our business the right way, on our own terms, instead of constantly reacting to market pressures. a decision at this scale carries risk. but so does standing still. we've done a full review to determine the roles and people we require to reliably grow the business from here, and we've pressure-tested those decisions from multiple angles. i accept that we may have gotten some of them wrong, and we've built in flexibility to account for that, and do the right thing for our customers. we're not going to just disappear people from slack and email and pretend they were never here. communication channels will stay open through thursday evening (pacific) so everyone can say goodbye properly, and share whatever you wish. i'll also be hosting a live video session to thank everyone at 3:35pm pacific. i know doing it this way might feel awkward. i'd rather it feel awkward and human than efficient and cold. to those of you leaving…i’m grateful for you, and i’m sorry to put you through this. you built what this company is today. that's a fact that i'll honor forever. this decision is not a reflection of what you contributed. you will be a great contributor to any organization going forward. to those staying…i made this decision, and i'll own it. what i'm asking of you is to build with me. we're going to build this company with intelligence at the core of everything we do. how we work, how we create, how we serve our customers. our customers will feel this shift too, and we're going to help them navigate it: towards a future where they can build their own features directly, composed of our capabilities and served through our interfaces. that's what i'm focused on now. expect a note from me tomorrow. jack

English
88
88
1.4K
356.8K
shart
shart@shartstate·
I think a better name for the debasement trade is the analog trade people often forget how powerful boomer memes are (e.g real estate)
English
1
0
1
58
shart
shart@shartstate·
think the next implosion comes from meta and its private debt complex unless they do an abrupt about turn like they did with the ‘metaverse’ and basically zero out capex over one quarter
English
0
0
0
51
shart retweetledi
fejau
fejau@fejau_inc·
What happens to market structure when MAG7 buybacks disappear this year? Think diversifying out of megacap tech is important theme to consider this year.
fejau tweet media
English
27
36
433
184.2K
shart
shart@shartstate·
@HyperTechInvest too many idiots who don’t understand it’s run by morons
English
0
0
0
4
Daniel Romero
Daniel Romero@HyperTechInvest·
$GRAB is a good example of why you shouldn’t always listen to X 1 year ago, it was the hottest pick Now you barely see it mentioned Why? > No clear upside thesis > The valuation was always expensive > Not enough growth > People overestimate the growth of poor countries
Daniel Romero tweet media
English
110
19
417
138.4K
shart
shart@shartstate·
there are still so many morons around Godspeed
Naeven@Naeven_0

.@infinex has revised its ico terms & now it looks much better $100m valuation with 1-year lockup or $300m valuation with no lockup they cut the initial valuation from $300m to $100m, while reducing the early-access valuation from $1b to $300m also, after the sonar sale, they’ll sell 2% of the supply via @Uniswap cca with a $100m floor even at $300m, that’s still lower than patron’s valuation, which is around $400M.... looks like a good deal?

English
0
0
0
101
shart
shart@shartstate·
you can write all the threads you want but the truth is the hl bros who got lucky and continue to degen bottom long have no skill and will be hunted + continuous team unlocks (new) + competition (new) + general loss of interest in crypto (new wave) = bad, very bad
English
0
0
0
17
shart
shart@shartstate·
im sad to say that hype has lost its pristine asset status gg
English
0
0
0
11
shart
shart@shartstate·
@MrBoywunder sack the manager and what? Play salah every match? And we win every game? Just because salah plays instead of someone else? that’s the most retarded statement I’ve ever heard in my life
English
0
0
0
9
MrBoywunder
MrBoywunder@MrBoywunder·
Slot HAS to go before we even dare think about pushing Salah out of the club, that man has given us too much to club. And the way Slot is acting after Salah basically carried him to the league last year is disgusting.
English
17
82
508
21.6K
Phaedra and Rat
Phaedra and Rat@mcdowell_ellie·
@TheRedmenTV Slot has to go. Certainly. Salah might have a dip in form but he’s club legend. To lose him like this? Not ok. I am not ok if Slot stays and Salah goes. That would be awful. Sack Slot right this minute.
English
6
0
17
6.5K
The Redmen TV
The Redmen TV@TheRedmenTV·
Thoughts on the Salah situation? 🤯
The Redmen TV tweet media
English
812
27
1.3K
305.8K
shart
shart@shartstate·
the large DATs might not ‘blow up’ if they technically don’t have to sell but that’s a technicality - very little capital will flow into any of them and mNAV will likely compress more accumulation vehicles can easily become bag holders when sentiment turns
English
0
0
0
24
shart
shart@shartstate·
fwiw, it is ok to make less than you wanted to - you can always do it over a slightly longer time frame the obsession with making it in one / a few trades is what creates the boom bust cycle in crypto anyway
English
0
0
0
18
shart
shart@shartstate·
the number 1 rule remains the same - survive and you shall thrive are there crypto assets worth bidding? of course. is it the time to bid now? it's hard to tell I think a lot of people are going to lose a lot simply for believing blindly
English
1
0
0
20
shart
shart@shartstate·
crypto prices have always been bound by the hip to global liquidity, but the correlation with overall macro is much deeper than ever before add to this the absence of new retail demand, who can basically degen stocks and options, and you have a dire liquidity outflow situation
English
0
0
0
19
shart
shart@shartstate·
here's my 2 cents on why price keeps going down: - macro deterioration (ai bubble fears, carry trade unwind, US macro) - bunch of mms blew up collectively (not one) - crappy DATs unwinding, limited capital flows to big DATs so lower net buying - no new demand from retail
English
2
0
0
37
shart
shart@shartstate·
mstr, ETFs, dats, trump (wlfi) have transformed crypto into basically the de-facto proxy of 'riskiest risk asset' in tradfi exposure any serious tradfi fund needs to own these assets, when risk-off mood kicks in, these are dumped into oblivion in risk rebalance
English
0
0
0
24