Shitrea

81 posts

Shitrea banner
Shitrea

Shitrea

@shitreatoken

💩 The native shitcoin of Citrea | Backed by Bitcoin's security, powered by degeneracy | Launching on @SatsumaDex

Katılım Mayıs 2026
8 Takip Edilen94 Takipçiler
Satsuma 🍊
Satsuma 🍊@SatsumaDEX·
Fuck it $Shitrea airdrop for all NFT Holders.
English
29
5
76
4.8K
Sanjeev
Sanjeev@sanjeev405786·
@SatsumaDEX Everything is scam who linked with citrea😭
English
1
0
0
7
shah
shah@shahh·
This guy is doing technical analysis on a 30k mcap memecoin, aping in with $29 per position. This is who you’re trading against.
English
225
37
1.1K
219.8K
Shitrea
Shitrea@shitreatoken·
Was drake talking about Shitrea?
Shitrea tweet media
English
1
1
5
61
tochi
tochi@oxtochi·
tell me why you disagree with this tier list
tochi tweet mediatochi tweet mediatochi tweet media
English
112
2
204
10.9K
orkun 🍊🍋
orkun 🍊🍋@0x_orkun·
Most governance tokens are a checkbox. Ship token, add voting, call it decentralized. CTR was designed around four mechanics that actually change how this works. First is xCTR, the staked form of CTR and the only token that carries voting power. Unlike timelocked staking where you freeze capital behind an arbitrary countdown, xCTR uses an exit fee. Unstaking has a 90-day unbonding window. You can access liquidity at any point, but you pay a fee that starts at 50% and decays to zero over time. The fees paid by early unstakers stay in the xCTR vault, increasing the CTR backing of every remaining staker's position. The mechanism naturally rewards long-term alignment. Second, dual treasury. Full DAO models are slow. Full foundation models are centralized. We split the difference. Foundation handles operations, R&D, and strategic initiatives. Governance Treasury, controlled by xCTR holders, handles emissions, council selection, and infrastructure decisions. Third, optimistic governance. The biggest problem in DAO governance is that nobody votes. Quorum-based models require active participation, good proposals die from apathy. CTR's governance is optimistic. Proposals pass by default unless xCTR holders veto. If it looks good, you do nothing. You only act when something is wrong. Same trust assumptions, radically better UX. Lastly, the gauge system. xCTR holders allocate emissions to specific pools and applications through on-chain voting each epoch. Voters who LP in the pool they vote for get multiplied emissions, improving capital efficiency across the network. Projects that want deep liquidity need xCTR votes, so they build CTR treasuries or incentivize holders to vote their way. Competition channeled into productive capital allocation.
orkun 🍊🍋 tweet media
English
44
12
68
3.9K
Ratgor
Ratgor@Ratgor_nft·
@0x_orkun tldr: we airdroped tokens to ourselves
English
1
0
0
66
LΞO💎
LΞO💎@leomerchant_eth·
@0x_orkun Wrap it up and go home! It over man. Now Watch your chain and Ecosystem sink to the depths of the Bermuda. @citrea_xyz is scam. Greedy team.
English
1
0
1
47
CD III
CD III@CDIIIcrypto·
@0x_orkun why bother so much when it will go to zero unless you crime pump it
English
1
0
1
236
pymparticles.eth
pymparticles.eth@pym0xe·
@0x_orkun yeah but we're not eligible just because we did not meet the minimum pts requirements because we're not a whale or KOL
English
1
0
0
56