Shitrea
81 posts

Shitrea
@shitreatoken
💩 The native shitcoin of Citrea | Backed by Bitcoin's security, powered by degeneracy | Launching on @SatsumaDex
Katılım Mayıs 2026
8 Takip Edilen94 Takipçiler

@theOnlyDossen @SatsumaDEX Emphasis on the airdrop will be shit lol
English

@SatsumaDEX @shitreatoken How do i get whitelisted wen am not an NFT holder but someone that has been here from day one
English

@0xarsha09 @citrea_xyz @rollie1212 @tugcesmith @yilmaz_btc @0x_orkun maybe if you tag us we will airdrop
English

I have been with citrea from the beginning, I have always supported her. The last is not eligible for allocation CTR. The only fault is that my x is not verified. So my love has no value. Dear team, please solve issue.
@citrea_xyz
@rollie1212
@tugcesmith
@yilmaz_btc
@0x_orkun
English

Most governance tokens are a checkbox. Ship token, add voting, call it decentralized. CTR was designed around four mechanics that actually change how this works.
First is xCTR, the staked form of CTR and the only token that carries voting power. Unlike timelocked staking where you freeze capital behind an arbitrary countdown, xCTR uses an exit fee. Unstaking has a 90-day unbonding window. You can access liquidity at any point, but you pay a fee that starts at 50% and decays to zero over time.
The fees paid by early unstakers stay in the xCTR vault, increasing the CTR backing of every remaining staker's position. The mechanism naturally rewards long-term alignment.
Second, dual treasury. Full DAO models are slow. Full foundation models are centralized. We split the difference. Foundation handles operations, R&D, and strategic initiatives. Governance Treasury, controlled by xCTR holders, handles emissions, council selection, and infrastructure decisions.
Third, optimistic governance. The biggest problem in DAO governance is that nobody votes. Quorum-based models require active participation, good proposals die from apathy. CTR's governance is optimistic. Proposals pass by default unless xCTR holders veto. If it looks good, you do nothing. You only act when something is wrong. Same trust assumptions, radically better UX.
Lastly, the gauge system. xCTR holders allocate emissions to specific pools and applications through on-chain voting each epoch. Voters who LP in the pool they vote for get multiplied emissions, improving capital efficiency across the network. Projects that want deep liquidity need xCTR votes, so they build CTR treasuries or incentivize holders to vote their way. Competition channeled into productive capital allocation.

English

@0x_orkun @citrea_xyz reward your testnet users, deceivers
English

@0x_orkun Wrap it up and go home! It over man. Now Watch your chain and Ecosystem sink to the depths of the Bermuda. @citrea_xyz is scam. Greedy team.
English

@0x_orkun yeah but we're not eligible just because we did not meet the minimum pts requirements because we're not a whale or KOL
English

@SatsumaDEX @shitreatoken You're talking too much already mate
Drop it or keep shut
English
















