Suhail Sherif

17 posts

Suhail Sherif

Suhail Sherif

@shlshrf

Bangalore/Mumbai Katılım Mayıs 2009
24 Takip Edilen38 Takipçiler
Edward Lee
Edward Lee@edwardleetwtr·
@ask_ourself @yashkaf @TaterTotient Well, you do have to be a little careful about endpoints, since the proof requires two of them. E.g. you can go from 0% (0/2) to 66% (4/6) without crossing 25%, though you do cross 50%. The exact values in the OP prevent this. Still a very clever problem (I missed it as well).
English
1
0
3
0
mathematical potato
mathematical potato@TaterTotient·
A basketball player has a season free throw average of 70% halfway through the season, and raises it to 80% by the end of the season. Is it necessarily true that it was exactly 75% at some point? Why or why not?
English
15
4
63
0
Suhail Sherif
Suhail Sherif@shlshrf·
@RamsesThePigeon Slightly vertically misplaced comma, but: Go'd rest ye merry gentlemen. You boisterous folks would find tranquility in a game of Go.
English
0
0
2
0
Ramses the Pigeon
Ramses the Pigeon@RamsesThePigeon·
I couldn't figure out where the comma(s) in "God Rest Ye Merry, Gentlemen" should go, so I hit myself in the face.
English
426
6K
19.2K
0
Suhail Sherif
Suhail Sherif@shlshrf·
@ccanonne_ @xkcd Unmumbling: Else we know that after one step two numbers are at most X_2/3 and the third is at most X_1. So after another step all numbers are at most X_8/9.
English
0
0
0
0
Suhail Sherif
Suhail Sherif@shlshrf·
@ccanonne_ @xkcd Let the numbers be (L,M,U) in increasing order. U-L shrinks by 1/9 every two steps: Let X_c=(1-c)L + cU for c in [0,1]. Use AM>=GM to see that two numbers in the next step are at most X_2/3. If M<X_8/9, enough shrinking happens. Else *mumbles*. ▫
English
1
0
0
0
Suhail Sherif
Suhail Sherif@shlshrf·
@ryanqnorth Hey, I'm a huge fan of squirrel girl, but I think the latest issue has exponential written instead of quadratic. It's bugging me, is anything going to be done about it? Thanks in advance.
English
0
0
1
0
Suhail Sherif retweetledi
Steven Kaas
Steven Kaas@stevenkaas·
[Conclusion] because [list of reasons] is almost a type error.
English
0
6
11
0
Suhail Sherif
Suhail Sherif@shlshrf·
@ClickerHeroes If you're going to jump from some finite number to infinity, why not just do that at 1 and save us from your insincere game?
English
0
0
0
0
Suhail Sherif retweetledi
TIFR Ultimate
TIFR Ultimate @tifr_ultimate·
TIFR Ultimate Frisbee stands in solidarity with the students of Jadavpur University. #juprotest
English
0
1
0
0
Suhail Sherif
Suhail Sherif@shlshrf·
@Better_History Please remove the feature where your last search shows up when you open Better History. Other than that, it's awesome! :)
English
0
0
0
0