tebba
4.9K posts






If Arsenal had beaten both Wolves and Bournemouth, we would still be nine points clear! Those matches were winnable, and we bottled both.



“Caicedo is better than Kante”😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭 youtube.com/live/-W87SzvUT…

I read something interesting about Paul Scholes yesterday. The writer argued it was when the football world began to respect Xavi’s style of play that they began to understand Scholes too. Especially when he became a deep lying playmaker who spread passes round. Scholes was a very good goalscorer. In fact, in his first 16 England games, he scored 7 goals. He scored over 150 goals for Man United too. But as a central midfield player, he argued Scholes wasn’t greatly rated in his era at the beginning. He premised his argument on the fact that Scholes was in the 50-man shortlist for the Ballon d’Or in 2000, 2001, 2003, 2004 and 2007 but never got a single vote in any of those years. What do you think?




The never ending cycle of Gyokeres and Havertz. One has shown you that if he can be found he will score 9/10 times, however he is rarely in those areas to score, the other has shown you that he can be found in those areas to score but when it matters most he will miss 9/10 times.




For some on here, finishing chances is the only way they distinguish between a good and bad player and that’s awfully sad that they can’t see everything else.







All Gyokeres actions vs sporting (2nd leg)









