Silver Dividend

@RohOnChain Great stuff

@MercuriusFilius MD/Analyst (10 m) Analyst back w/🔦 (1m) VP/Analyst (5 m) Analyst back w/🔦 (1m) Associate/Analyst (2m) Leave the associate behind

How would you answer this common Goldman Sachs interview question?

Silver rips to highest price in almost 3 weeks 📈📈📈

The message is the great depression didn't look so bad, people in suits and dresses walking around.

Thank god it's taco tuesday

@DonDurrett @jenstilmanydots In uranium, Troy Boisjoli of Atha Energy hit 53 of 55 holes which is insane. Drilling starting again soon for 2026

I can name three that you didn't mention. Eric Sprott (The legend) Sean Boyd (Agnico Eagle CEO) Tony Makuch (Discovery Silver CEO) And these three younger guys to keep an eye on. Paul Huet (Americas Gold & Silver CEO) Hugh Agro (Revival Gold CEO) Charles Funk (Heliostar Metals CEO)

Most investors can name the legends - Pierre Lassonde, Robert Friedland, Ross Beaty. Almost no one knows who’s next (Lundins aside, of course). 
In our May issue, we’re highlighting 10 next-gen mining names that could define the next cycle…

Happy 4/7 to those who celebrate. April 7 is our day. 47 is the atomic number for silver. Silver47 is our name. We have 246 million silver equivalent ounces in three US jurisdictions.¹ Drilling now in Nevada and drilling soon in Alaska. $AGA.V $AAGAF #silver ¹ For important notes on mineral resource estimates, please refer to Table 1 "Combined Silver Mineral Resource Summary" → silver47.ca/silver47-and-s… ¹ Notes to Silver47 Mineral Resources: 1. The 2024 Red Mountain mineral resource estimate (“MRE”) was estimated and classified in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (“CIM”) “Estimation of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves Best Practice Guidelines” dated November 29, 2019, and the CIM “Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves” dated May 10, 2014. 2. Mr. Warren Black, M.Sc., P.Geo. of APEX Geoscience Ltd., a “qualified person” (“QP”) as defined by National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”), is responsible for completing the MRE, effective January 12, 2024. 3. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves have no demonstrated economic viability. No mineral reserves have been calculated for Red Mountain. There is no guarantee that any part of the mineral resources discussed herein will be converted to a mineral reserve in the future. 4. The estimate of mineral resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, market, or other relevant factors. 5. The quantity and grade of reported inferred mineral resources is uncertain, and there has not been sufficient work to define the inferred mineral resource as an indicated or measured mineral resource. 6. All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimates. Totals may not sum due to rounding. Reported grades are undiluted. 7. A standard density of 2.94 g/cm³ is assumed for mineralized material and waste rock. Overburden density is set at 1.8 g/cm³. For mineralized material blocks with iron assays close enough to estimate an iron value for the block, density is calculated using the formula: density (g/cm³) = 0.0553 * Fe (%) + 2.5426. 8. Metal prices are US$2,750/tonne Zn, US$2,100/tonne Pb, US$8,880/tonne Cu, US$1,850/oz Au, and US$23/oz Ag. 9. Recoveries are 90% Zn, 75% Pb, 70% Cu, 70% Ag, and 80% Au. 10. ZnEQ (%) = [Zn (%) x 1] + [Pb (%) x 0.6364] + [Cu (%) x 2.4889] + [Ag (ppm) x 0.0209] + [Au (ppm) x 1.923] 11. AgEQ (ppm) = [Zn (%) x 47.81] + [Pb (%) x 30.43] + [Cu (%) x 119] + [Ag (ppm) x 1] + [Au (ppm) x 91.93] 12. Open-pit resource economic assumptions are US$3/tonne for mining mineralized and waste material, US$19/tonne for processing, and 48° pit slopes. 13. Underground resource economic assumptions are US$50/tonne for mining mineralized and waste material and US$19/tonne for processing. 14. Open-pit resources comprise blocks constrained by the pit shell resulting from the pseudoflow optimization using the open-pit economic assumptions. 15. Underground resources comprise blocks below the open-pit shell that form minable shapes. They must be contained in domains of a minimum width of 1.5 m at Dry Creek or 3 m height at West Tundra Flats. Resources not meeting these size criteria are included if, once diluted to the required size, maintain a grade above the cutoff. Notes to Summa Mineral Resources: 1. Silver Equivalent (AgEq) cut-off grade for the Hughes Project in situ Mineral Resources is based on a silver price of $25/oz, recovery of 90% Ag, and cost assumptions including: USD$88.2/t average mining cost for approximately 70% longhole stoping and 30% cut and fill mining, USD$36.3/t processing cost, USD$9.7/t G&A cost, USD$0.20/oz Ag refining cost for a total mining, processing and G&A cost of USD$134.2/tonne. A 3% royalty has also been applied to the cut-off grade determination. 2. Silver Equivalent (AgEq) cut-off grade for the Hughes Project tailings Mineral Resources is contained within an optimized pit and based on a silver price of $25/oz, recovery of 90% Ag, and cost assumptions including: USD$2.25/t mining cost, USD$21.0/t processing cost, USD$9/t G&A cost, USD$0.50/oz Ag refining cost for a total mining, processing and G&A cost of USD$33.34/tonne. A 3% royalty has also been applied to the cut-off grade determination. 3. Silver Equivalent (AgEq) cut-off grade for the Mogollon Project Mineral Resources is based on a silver price of $25/oz, recovery of 97% Ag, and cost assumptions including: USD$83/t mining cost for longhole stoping, USD$36.3/t processing cost, USD$9.7/t G&A cost, USD$0.20/oz Ag refining cost for a total mining, processing and G&A cost of USD$129/tonne A 3% royalty has also been applied to the cut-off grade determination. 4. AgEq is based on silver and gold prices of $25/oz and $2100/oz respectively, and recoveries for silver and gold of 90% and 97%, respectively for the Hughes Project, and 97% and 97%, respectively, for the Mogollon Project. AgEq Factor= (Ag Price / Au Price) x (Ag Rec / Au Rec); g AgEq/t = g Ag/t + (g Au/t / AgEq Factor). 5. Rounding as required by reporting guidelines may result in apparent discrepancies between tonnes, grade, and contained metal content. 6. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that all or any part of the mineral resources estimated will be converted into mineral reserves. The quantity and grade of reported Inferred mineral resources in this estimation are uncertain in nature and there has been insufficient exploration to define these Inferred mineral resources as Indicated mineral resources. It is uncertain if further exploration will result in upgrading them to the Indicated mineral resources category. 7. The Mineral Resources were estimated in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM), CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves, Definitions (2014) and Best Practices Guidelines (2019) prepared by the CIM Standing Committee on Reserve Definitions and adopted by the CIM Council. 8. There are no known environmental, permitting, legal, or other factors which could materially affect the MREs.

@SilverDegen Silver47 has a new one that is very nice

What is the most elegant and exquisite silver coin in existence? I’ve got an itch that needs scratching.

Silver daily chart. Rally is underway...

"You don't really get too many opportunities like this..." – CEO $AGA.V $AAGAF With $54 million in the bank and three high-grade U.S.-based silver projects, we're drilling 7,000m RIGHT NOW in Tonopah’s historic district. "We're looking for the main structure" 🎙️ @jessebday

#Silver has cleared a multi-decade ascending triangle and surged through long-term resistance. The breakout signals a structural shift, with price now holding above former resistance as it transitions into a higher range with strong upside potential.

"We definitely need to go up and retest that $100 limit and break through it ... we're just starting a generational bull market." @GalenMcNamara CEO of @Silver47co, on where he sees the #silver market headed. Full interview up TOMORROW.

@jessebday One of the best US explorers. If not the best. 246 million ounces and drilling happening now in Nevada and then soon in Alaska 🐂 $AGA.V

Galen McNamara, CEO of @Silver47co believes that #silver's run to triple digits earlier in the year was merely a preview of a coming bull market he thinks will result in a generational opportunity for those who understand the fundamentals of the sector. Galen explains how Silver47 fits into the picture, with their focus on high-grade silver exploration in the United States. Silver47 Website: silver-47.com Buy Silver47 Rounds: silver-47.com/product/silver… Disclaimer: Commodity Culture was compensated by Sasquatch Resources for producing this interview. Jesse Day is not a shareholder of Sasquatch Resources. Nothing contained in this video is to be construed as investment advice, do your own due diligence. $AAGAF $AGA.v

The Silver47-DARPA announcement is leading into the publication of the US-Mexico Action Plan, which will identify #silver specifically, for the first time, as a "critical mineral of interest" for a price floor. This is the news that will trigger fireworks imho.

@silvertrade $AGA.V $AAGAF

🚨BREAKING: DEPT OF WAR COUNTERING FOREIGN MANIPULATION OF SILVER⚠️ 🚨SILVER47 JOINS DARPA/DEPARTMENT OF WAR-BACKED CRITICAL MINERALS FORUM TO COUNTER FOREIGN MANIPULATION OF CRITICAL MINERALS

@DeItaone $AAGAF gets the inside lane

SILVER47 JOINS DARPA/DEPARTMENT OF WAR-BACKED CRITICAL MINERALS FORUM TO COUNTER FOREIGN MANIPULATION OF CRITICAL MINERALS

HUGE 💥 Silver47 has joined the Critical Minerals Forum, a DARPA-funded coalition backing the U.S. Department of War’s mission to secure critical materials for defense, aerospace & energy @DeptofWar @DARPA $AGA.V $AAGAF