🚨In new work led by @simcastle, we consider what it means to engineer something and what exactly the design process is. By linking to key engineering literature that has been overlooked by much of #synbio to date, we find evolution is a unifying concept. osf.io/urq9w/
So I am in Bristol for the coming months. Anyone in the neighborhood interested in a chat about biotech, food 5.0, board games, cooking, programming, bouldering, phages, scifi, machine learning, evolution... with a beverage?
@yaxu I make music using evolutionary algorithms (genetic algorithms, gene networks) and biological datasets, if that's of interest soundcloud.com/sim-castle
Evolutionary processes drive complexity without “design”, ok. But in uncontroversial cases of design: what's an engineer *actually* doing under the hood? Same generate-select-vary cycle, just virtual mental sim, or smthg more? Pointers pls to cogsci lit dissecting design process.
"It took years — eight years and counting in exile — for me to realize that I was missing the point: we talk about conspiracy theories in order to avoid talking about conspiracy practices, which are often too daunting, too threatening, too total." edwardsnowden.substack.com/p/conspiracy-p…
@simcastle Halley's, Newton's, Stevenson's, etc. = methods to find roots of an equation in Z. Iterative: start with a guess, keep going until it converges. The color of each pixel = how fast it converged (or not) when starting with that coordinate (x,y) = x+yi as an initial guess for Z.
A Halley plot of a very simple function in complex Z, with each frame a tiny change in one of the parameters. Amazing how much coherent complexity is hidden in such a short function.