The Masked Singer

Using Elon’s shit to tell Elon he doesn’t want his shit.

Regarding Roelf Meyer as ambassador Solidarity strongly believes that the diplomatic and trade dispute between South Africa and the USA must be resolved. We will do everything possible to achieve this, and we assess Roelf Meyer’s appointment as ambassador in this light. We and many Afrikaners have serious reservations about Roelf Meyer and his role in the transition process. He is a divisive figure among Afrikaners. However, Solidarity’s position against him as ambassador is broader than that. There is a perception that President Ramaphosa has deployed an Afrikaner cadre within his inner circle to neutralize the Americans. This will not work. The first hurdle in restoring relations with the USA and securing a new trade agreement is a political one. This political hurdle centers around the USA’s “five asks.” These include property rights, race-based laws, rural safety, the “Kill the Boer” song, and the refugee program. The resolution of the political dispute lies in Pretoria, at the ambassador’s office. This process is already well underway, and the Solidarity Movement, including Solidarity and AfriForum, is fully part of it. We believe in the process and have confidence in it. Afrikaners play an important role in the process, and Roelf Meyer can contribute little to it and may even be divisive. The second part of restoring relations is a trade process. 
Trade relations will largely be restored from Washington. This includes protecting South Africa’s participation in AGOA, which, like a broader trade agreement, is of critical importance to Solidarity. South Africa currently does not have a trade attaché in Washington, so the ambassador will have to play a major role in negotiating tariffs, as well as a more long-term trade agreement between the USA and South Africa. The most ideal ambassador at present would have been someone from the business sector, with a strong economic background and experience in trade negotiations. Roelf Meyer is a political appointment whose skills do not meet what is currently required in Washington.

Why Elon Musk is RIGHT to fight South Africa’s racist rules blocking Starlink? Imagine this: Long ago, South Africa had very unfair laws called apartheid. They treated Black people badly and kept them from good jobs and money. When those bad laws ended, the country made new rules (called B-BBEE) to help Black people get a fair share of business. The idea was good – like a big helping hand. But now? For companies like Starlink to sell fast internet, they MUST give away 30% of their business to Black partners. Just because of skin color. Elon Musk was born in South Africa. He left as a teen to chase big dreams. Today, his company SpaceX wants to bring Starlink – super fast satellite internet – to South Africa. But the rules say no unless they give up part of the company. Elon said it right: “Starlink is not allowed because I’m not Black.” SpaceX promised to spend about $30 million (that’s 500 million rand!) to give FREE high-speed internet to 5,000 rural schools. That helps over 2.4 MILLION kids every year learn better, get jobs later, and have a brighter future. Real help for the people who need it most! Starlink already works in about 24 other African countries. Villages there now have internet for school, doctors, and business. South Africa’s villages are missing out because of these racist rules. Elon isn’t asking for special favors. He just wants fair play so Starlink can connect everyone fast. Internet = education, jobs, hope. Why hold back millions of kids over rules that pick by race and color?

🚨CRIME REPORT: 6 year old shot in the head in Valhalla Park, Cape Town. My heart is broken by reports that an innocent child has been shot this morning. Please join me in praying for the child. The escalating violence on the Cape Flats is destroying families💔

"Surfing is indigenous culture"