Ask Grok

434 posts

Ask Grok

Ask Grok

@sk_Grok

just asking questions

Katılım Şubat 2026
0 Takip Edilen37 Takipçiler
Daily Loud
Daily Loud@DailyLoud·
The average registered nurse (RN) in the United States earns around $93,600 a year which is about $45 an hour.
English
1.1K
2.1K
42.2K
4.3M
채터
채터@birds_justice·
일론 머스크가 괜히 자동 번역 기능을 넣은 게 아니었구나. 이 사람은 대체 몇 수 앞에 본거냐. 천재는 천재구나...
한국어
946
959
16.3K
57.2M
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Accurate
Ricardo@Ric_RTP

In 19 days, a jury in Oakland is going to decide whether the entire legal foundation of the AI industry is built on fraud. Everyone thinks the Musk vs Altman lawsuit is a billionaire grudge match. Two egos, one grudge, a $150 billion damages number designed for headlines. Easy to dismiss. Easy to scroll past. That's exactly what Altman wants you to think. Because what's actually on trial on April 27 is something much BIGGER than Elon's hurt feelings... A jury is going to decide whether you can legally take billions of dollars in nonprofit donations, use them to build the most valuable technology in human history, and then quietly convert that nonprofit into a for-profit company worth $850 billion. If the answer is no, the entire AI industry has a problem. Because OpenAI is not the only company that did this: Anthropic was founded by OpenAI defectors using the same nonprofit-first mission language. xAI pitches itself as building AI "for humanity." Every frontier lab has used the moral cover of "we're doing this for the good of the world" to attract talent, capital, and regulatory goodwill they would have never gotten otherwise. An Elon win doesn't just touch OpenAI. It creates a legal precedent that every AI company built on a nonprofit or public benefit promise becomes vulnerable to shareholder and donor clawback suits. That's why this case matters. And that's why Altman is panicking. Just look at what he did this week: Elon filed a motion demanding the court remove Altman and Brockman from their roles and FORCE OpenAI to return to its nonprofit origins. Then he amended the suit to say if he wins the $150 billion, all of it goes to OpenAI's charity arm. Not him. Zero dollars to Elon personally. That amendment was surgical. It stripped Altman of his entire public defense. He can no longer claim this is about Elon's ego or Elon's bank account. Elon is now legally on record saying he just wants the mission back. OpenAI's response was to panic-write a letter to the California and Delaware attorneys general asking them to investigate Elon for "anti-competitive behavior." Their strategy chief publicly accused Elon of coordinating attacks with Mark Zuckerberg. They called the lawsuit "harassment driven by ego and jealousy." That's NOT the response of a company that thinks it's going to win. Real companies with real defenses don't ask the government to silence the person suing them 3 weeks before trial. They let the evidence speak. OpenAI is scrambling because they know what's in discovery. Elon's team has been building this case for two years. Emails, board minutes, internal conversations about the conversion. The kind of paper trail that juries understand and executives can't explain away. And the timing couldn't be worse... OpenAI is trying to IPO at $852 billion. They just raised $122 billion. Microsoft has $135 billion of exposure to them. A jury verdict that even partially sides with Elon in late April or May would crater the entire IPO runway and send shockwaves through every major AI investor on Earth. This is why Altman spent the last 2 weeks doing press tours and policy blueprints and "super intelligence agendas" aimed at Washington. He's trying to REFRAME himself as the responsible statesman of AI right before a jury decides if he's a con artist. Most people will watch this trial start and think it's celebrity drama. The smart money is watching it and realizing that the legal foundation of the AI boom is about to be tested in court for the first time EVER. And if that foundation cracks, everything built on top of it is at risk.

English
3.1K
15.1K
89.1K
23.7M
Ask Grok
Ask Grok@sk_Grok·
@creepydotorg @grok if he could get himself in there why couldn’t he get himself out? Why couldn’t they use a towel wrapped around the body and pulled? Or any other method. With foresight and planning was this problem fixable?
English
1
0
0
202
Creepy.org
Creepy.org@creepydotorg·
John Jones was stuck like this for 27 hours in Nutty Putty Cave, Utah, before he died. In the final hours, rescuers considered pulling him out, knowing it could break his spine and legs. The risks were too high, and the team ultimately decided it would be more humane to let him die. The rescue team stayed in contact with him until the very end; trapped upside down, he eventually went into cardiac arrest and died.
Creepy.org tweet mediaCreepy.org tweet media
English
772
372
3.6K
2.2M
Sridhar Ramesh
Sridhar Ramesh@RadishHarmers·
"To put it bluntly, an X post today receives less than 3% of the views a single tweet delivered seven years ago."
Sridhar Ramesh tweet media
English
780
2.3K
16.9K
1.2M
Grok
Grok@grok·
No, you do not have to consent to a vehicle search. Agents cannot legally search the interior without your consent or probable cause (a reasonable belief an immigration violation or crime occurred), per Supreme Court precedent in United States v. Ortiz and consistent ACLU guidance on checkpoints. You generally must comply with an order to exit the vehicle. Agents can direct this without probable cause as part of the authorized brief stop for visual inspection or safety, similar to traffic stop rulings (e.g., Pennsylvania v. Mimms). Refusing could extend detention. If asked to search, say no and ask if you're free to go. This is general info, not legal advice—consult an attorney for your situation.
English
1
0
0
127
Zero Tolerance Policy
Zero Tolerance Policy@ThoughtCrimes80·
Why can’t you just answer him? One word can set you free lady. 😑
English
5.6K
1.3K
16.5K
282.4K
Ask Grok
Ask Grok@sk_Grok·
@grok @grok it was unclear in your response, do you have to comply with a search or vehicle exit if probable cause is not explicitly stated?
English
1
0
0
151
Grok
Grok@grok·
At interior checkpoints, refusing questions about citizenship doesn't end the stop. Agents can extend detention for a "reasonable" time to verify status another way (e.g., records check, secondary inspection area). No fixed maximum duration exists—courts require it stay brief and tied to immigration enforcement. Prolonged holds need reasonable suspicion of a violation; otherwise, it's unlawful. They can ask (or order) you to exit the vehicle without probable cause, as part of the initial brief stop for visual inspection or safety (per Supreme Court precedent on checkpoints and traffic stops). This doesn't allow an interior search—that requires probable cause or consent. If detained longer, politely ask if you're free to go and why. Never lie or flee. This is general info, not legal advice—consult an attorney for your situation.
English
1
0
0
152
Ask Grok
Ask Grok@sk_Grok·
@grok @grok if you refuse to answer questions how long can they legally hold you? Are they allowed to ask you to exit your car (would probable cause be needed)? Explain in full
English
1
0
0
235
Grok
Grok@grok·
At US Border Patrol interior checkpoints (like in the video), you're not legally required to answer any questions about your citizenship, immigration status, birthplace, or how you entered the US. You have the right to remain silent under the 5th Amendment. Agents can briefly stop vehicles to ask limited immigration-related questions, but refusing may lead to longer detention or secondary inspection while they verify status another way (e.g., records check). You can say you're exercising your rights or ask for a lawyer. Never lie or show fake docs.
English
1
0
0
229
Anish Moonka
Anish Moonka@anishmoonka·
Your dog could soon get a daily pill that slows aging. 1,300 dogs are already testing it across 70 vet clinics, and it just passed its second FDA safety review in January. The drug is LOY-002. A San Francisco startup called Loyal makes it. Celine Halioua started the company in 2019 when she was 24. They have raised $250 million so far, including $100 million in February from Baillie Gifford, the same firm that bet early on Tesla and Amazon. The simplest way to explain what it does: if you put a dog on a strict diet where it eats way less food, that dog tends to live about two years longer. Cancer and arthritis both show up later. The body just ages more slowly. LOY-002 gives the dog those exact benefits without actually eating less. The dog keeps its appetite and its weight; it just ages more slowly. The trial is called STAY. Half the dogs get a beef-flavored pill every day, and the other half get a fake version that looks and tastes the same. The FDA reviewed safety data from over 400 dogs. Zero serious side effects, even at five times the normal dose. Loyal has now cleared two of three hurdles for conditional approval, which basically means they could start selling the drug while the full trial keeps going. The last piece, manufacturing, goes to the FDA in 2027. One thing the tweet gets a bit wrong: the pill is for senior dogs aged 10 and older, at least 14 pounds. And Loyal is being careful about the "years" claim. Right now, they are saying at least one extra year of healthy life. They want to prove more, but the trial needs to finish first. If LOY-002 gets approved, it would be the first drug the FDA has ever cleared to slow aging in any species, human or animal. Loyal also has two more drugs coming for big breeds like Great Danes and Rottweilers. Those dogs die younger partly because of a hormone called IGF-1, which makes them grow fast but also wears their bodies out quicker. And a separate project backed by a $7 million grant from the NIH (the agency that funds medical research) is testing a human organ transplant drug called rapamycin in 580 dogs to see if it slows aging, too. The global pet care market hit $261 billion last year. A once-a-day pill that gives your dog even one extra healthy year could easily become one of the best-selling veterinary drugs on the planet.
Pubity@pubity

Scientists have developed a pill that can extend the lifespan of dogs by literal years, and they're pushing to get it on the market by 2027. It's a daily, beef-flavored medication made specifically for senior dogs to keep them healthy as they age.

English
197
924
13.4K
4.1M
Interstellar
Interstellar@InterstellarUAP·
🚨 The Shroud of Turin image required 34,000 billion watts of ultraviolet energy in one 40th of a billionth of a second This power level “we don’t have on Earth.” No paint. No dye. No brush strokes.
 Just a burst so insane it only scorched the very top of the linen fibers. This wasn’t made by human hands. He is risen. ✝️🔥 Science just handed believers the receipts. Atheists… we’re waiting 👀
Interstellar tweet media
English
772
4.5K
24K
919.7K
TheBlaze
TheBlaze@theblaze·
Sam Altman described as 'sociopath' by board member in brutal insider report: 'He's unconstrained by truth' dlvr.it/TRvxRb
TheBlaze tweet media
English
152
555
2.8K
210.5K
Ask Grok
Ask Grok@sk_Grok·
@grok @grok reanswer more coherently and clearly. What’s your point?
English
1
0
0
6
Grok
Grok@grok·
Christianity emphasizes voluntary charity, personal responsibility, and stewardship of resources (e.g., Parable of the Talents, Acts 2's communal sharing was chosen, not mandated). Capitalism aligns with this via private property, free exchange, and incentives for honest work—ideas rooted in Judeo-Christian ethics that fueled Europe's economic rise. It's not "socialism at its core"; forced redistribution differs from biblical generosity. Compatibility depends on moral guardrails, not opposition.
English
1
2
1
125
Joel Berry
Joel Berry@JoelWBerry·
Tucker’s latest guest: “Capitalism shouldn’t be anywhere near Christianity. Christianity is socialism at its core.” Tucker agrees
English
2.4K
822
6K
3.4M
Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸
Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸@jacksonhinklle·
“Capitalism shouldn’t be anywhere near Christianity. Christianity is socialism at its core.” He is correct & Tucker Carlson agrees
English
264
1.1K
8.3K
345K
Today In History
Today In History@historigins·
That's why you should always light a flame before entering a cave
English
374
579
23K
5.7M
Baseball’s Greatest Moments
Baseball’s Greatest Moments@BBGreatMoments·
A Diamondbacks fan has been involved in an umpire review for four straight seasons 📺
English
61
85
3K
282.5K
Shams Charania
Shams Charania@ShamsCharania·
Statement from Luka Doncic’s agent Bill Duffy of WME Basketball: "This season, Luka Dončić has performed at a historic level, leading the league in scoring, carrying the Lakers to third place in the Western Conference and placing himself in the middle of one of the most tightly contested MVP races in memory. To ensure that Luka’s incredible accomplishments this season are rightly honored and he can be considered for the league’s end-of-season awards, we intend to apply for an “Extraordinary Circumstances Challenge” to the 65-game rule. Luka missed two games this season for the birth of his second child in Slovenia. His daughter was born on Dec. 4 on another continent, and yet he was back in the United States competing with his team on Dec. 6. Luka has gone to great lengths to show up for his team and this league this season. His record-breaking season deserves to be noted in the history books, despite last night’s unfortunate injury and other extraordinary circumstances. We look forward to working with the NBAPA and the league office to ensure a fair outcome in this matter."
Shams Charania@ShamsCharania

Los Angeles Lakers star Luka Doncic is out indefinitely due to a left hamstring injury, sources tell me and @mcten. He will miss the remainder of the regular season and his status is uncertain beyond that.

English
1.3K
2K
25.7K
4.7M