skittering

21 posts

skittering

skittering

@skittering97

Singapore Katılım Mart 2014
22 Takip Edilen19 Takipçiler
skittering
skittering@skittering97·
@SCOTUS_gami Principal opinions (incl majorities) are only compared to other principal opinions. That way principal solo dissents don't get mixed up with solo concurrences as happened here. Non-principal opinions get compared to everything, as you currently do.
English
1
0
1
76
skittering
skittering@skittering97·
@SCOTUS_gami I suggest an alternate scheme. It's a bit more complex but still clean. 1. Opinions whose justices are a subset of those in another opinion (incl the majority) are "non-principal" 2. Everything else is a "principal" opinion
English
1
0
1
53
SCOTUSgami
SCOTUSgami@SCOTUS_gami·
A thread to clarify my standard for a SCOTUSgami: In the spirit of other -gami’s, they shouldn’t be too frequent. To achieve this, I’ve chosen to only count individual pieces of writing that are joined by unique sets of justices.
English
6
1
88
10.7K
SCOTUSgami
SCOTUSgami@SCOTUS_gami·
@steve_vladeck I’ll also note that there’s a good reason nobody has done this before. You would think someone has made a dataset with detailed SCOTUS opinion breakdowns. Somehow, it seems like nobody has, and if they have, I have been unable to find it.
English
2
0
16
611
skittering
skittering@skittering97·
@WilliamBaude Interesting, perhaps I should try it then. I dropped the series after Bedlam Bride, felt the books were getting too big and too indulgent
English
0
0
0
47
skittering
skittering@skittering97·
@ZhouJaron Is the map on the left Trump 24 results? What's the lean in those red districts? I'm guessing GA Rs will go for 11-3, 12-2 is a bit scary in a "Dem-trending" state
English
0
0
0
26
Habeas Corpus Linguistics
Habeas Corpus Linguistics@HabCorpLinguist·
Alito and Thomas should announce they’re retiring effective end of term.
English
6
2
35
4.1K
skittering
skittering@skittering97·
@PoliticalKiwi The legislature *can* do whatever it wants now, since the judgment has been vacated. Assuming the leg does nothing, it will default to one seat.
English
0
0
0
384
skittering
skittering@skittering97·
@mike_frags Well, you could get a classical pick, or you might get a DJT personal lawyer (Bove/Smith/Schwartz). I'm sure the latter group could turn out to be superb — but I can see why some judges are wary.
English
0
0
2
387
Mike Fragoso
Mike Fragoso@mike_frags·
If any senior eligible circuit judges out there like the Domenico and Traynor picks, you have about two or three weeks to go senior. Don’t say you weren’t warned!
English
3
6
59
15K
skittering
skittering@skittering97·
@MattGlassman312 No, gerrymandering is definitely a P's Dilemma. The best outcome is when I gerrymander and you don't. The second best outcome is cooperation. So you always want to gerrymander, which is P's Dilemma.
English
0
0
0
20
Matt Glassman
Matt Glassman@MattGlassman312·
Partisan political actors are articulating---and playing out-- a lot of unusually-clear game theory right now---on gerrymandering, on court packing, and on filibuster-nuking. Stag Hunts everywhere you look! blog.mattglassman.net/partisan-stag-…
English
3
5
18
4.1K
Dilan Esper
Dilan Esper@dilanesper·
@OrinKerr 1. This may be the last chance for awhile for him to retire and be replaced by a Republican. 2. He's pretty political. 3. His book release is timed for an October book tour when SCOTUS is in session.
English
4
1
56
5K
Dilan Esper
Dilan Esper@dilanesper·
bookmark this tweet so you can come back and tell me i was wrong, but I agree with Dahlia Lithwick, Mark Joseph Stern, Elie Mystal, etc., that Sam Alito is going to step down in June. slate.com/news-and-polit…
English
17
16
142
50.8K
skittering
skittering@skittering97·
@dilanesper The more common criticism I see of CU is that it was first case to say that money is speech. Which is ... also untrue.
English
4
0
5
992
Dilan Esper
Dilan Esper@dilanesper·
I have decided to do an occasional series explaining legal doctrines I think the public does not understand and unfairly criticize. So let's talk about corporate personhood and Citizens United!
English
39
82
619
85.1K
skittering
skittering@skittering97·
@dilanesper I don't like how Justice "no such thing as SDP" Thomas is happy to cite Troxel (and concurred in that decision). Scalia dissent in Troxel was completely correct.
English
1
0
0
120
Dilan Esper
Dilan Esper@dilanesper·
I think we may eventually see this Court endorse a broader substantive due process parental rights doctrine, and I think liberals should think about contexts where such a doctrine will be useful to their own causes.
English
5
1
23
4.2K
Dilan Esper
Dilan Esper@dilanesper·
I really called it. Religious conservatives created a phony business because a real business would almost certainly have a record of homophobic discrimination, and used the fake business to write an exception into antidiscrimination laws. Just a shameful episode.
English
5
2
17
1K
Dilan Esper
Dilan Esper@dilanesper·
BTW if a liberal Court of Appeals panel wants to force birthright citizenship up to SCOTUS, deliberately ruling in favor of the Trump Administration would probably do it. That would give the plaintiffs standing to seek cert.
Dilan Esper@dilanesper

@bonerici @foam_boat No you can't because the strategy only "works" as long as you lose every case.

English
5
1
16
4K
skittering
skittering@skittering97·
@dilanesper I normally like and respect your takes, so I'll assume you're having a rough morning Being told sgp is "autocratic" and not a democracy when I see: parliamentary coverage; election billboards; gvmt trying to be popular & moderate; and an election tomorrow is v strange to me
English
0
0
0
24
Dilan Esper
Dilan Esper@dilanesper·
@skittering97 And Donald Trump was voted out of office in favor of a politician of the other party in 2020. Does Singapore have that freedom? OK, so don't mouth off about Trump here.
English
1
0
0
59
Dilan Esper
Dilan Esper@dilanesper·
Melissa's take is intelligent and she knows a lot more about Singapore than I do, but her perspective doesn't consider that things such as these family feuds are more likely when you have veneration of a single person's rule rather than competitive, pluralistic political systems.
Melissa Chen@MsMelChen

Elections in Singapore are a couple days away so this NYT op-ed by Lee Kuan Yew’s son is potentially explosive. I’m sympathetic to some of Lee Hsien Yang’s arguments (especially on some of Singapore’s illiberal policies) but what this really stems from is a family feud between two brothers (one is the former Prime Minister and the other, the author) played out on a national and international scale. It’s really sad that this is part of the Lee family legacy now. Singapore may seem like an autocracy judging from outcomes (one-party rule since 1965); one could make the argument that elections are therefore a mere formality. But what if the ruling party, LKY’s People’s’ Action Party (PAP), is what the people continue to choose? What if this does actually reflect the will of the people? To characterize Singapore as an autocracy is to basically consign one of the wealthiest, safest nations (GDP/capital) into the same bin as China or North Korea. This kind of op-ed does little to change the minds of Singaporeans. The whole “Democracy™ vs. Evil Autocracies” framework doesn’t work outside of the W.E.I.R.D (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich and Democratic) orbit. Partly it’s because the Western media warning about the “dangers of autocracy” rings hollow. Is it really true after all, that it’s only autocracies that have unchecked power, rampant corruption, and politics that serve the elite at the expense of the people? Outsiders can see that the US political system - controlled by billionaires, lobbyists and special interests - functions more like a corporate oligarchy than a democracy. They’ve seen two-tier systems and weaponized lawfare. They’ve seen how wielding the wrong opinions can get you debanked and canceled from your job and exiled from polite society. They’ve seen how the US can’t even maintain basic infrastructure, let alone solve social crises. So kvetching about authoritarian doom in Singapore on the pages of the NYT has the same effect as threatening to annex Canada and incorporate it as the 51st state, I’m afraid. It will only stoke nationalistic sentiment. It will backfire. Or it just won’t matter at all.

English
2
0
8
2K
skittering
skittering@skittering97·
@dilanesper I'm not claiming it deserves a 9. (I don't know enough to be precise, but 6 feels low. Only recent incident I recall is an arrest for racist comments online - which we see in UK too!) My point is Sgp is mostly liberal and democratic - same way you defend Israel.
English
0
0
0
39
Dilan Esper
Dilan Esper@dilanesper·
@skittering97 The Economist democracy index rates Singapore as a "flawed democracy' with ratings in the 6's-- truly democratic countries score high 8's or 9's.
English
1
0
0
56