Susan

14.8K posts

Susan banner
Susan

Susan

@skyork57

Katılım Mart 2011
52 Takip Edilen238 Takipçiler
Jenny
Jenny@Jennnyyyyyy·
I bet you can't guess it right 😋 Difficulty - Hard 🤯
Jenny tweet media
English
11.1K
157
1.4K
681.3K
Pippa Oona
Pippa Oona@SecretRiversMap·
You may experience intense nausea after a Timeline Jump. It happened to me recently. There is something about unfamiliar frequencies which can be extremely unsettling. Remember The Protocol, friends. Again this is: 1) Ground 2) The Breath 3) Core Being 4) Ask, "What is my mission in this realm?" 5) Trust you will get back to your familiar frequency range if you are meant to. Oh my goodness, you will be so grateful you remembered the above, I tell you. But Number 3 is enough if you don't remember the others.
English
5
6
44
1.3K
Susan
Susan@skyork57·
@NoContextHumans lol. I was looking at the seat I would normally pick, NOT who were in the seats. Window with a gap between me and the other passenger, 3F. THEN I NOTICED THE PEOPLE! 3F is still the best choice.
English
0
0
0
8
Susan
Susan@skyork57·
@keith369me Sync of words happening here as well. Starting to think I need to pull away from finding an actual meaning to all this, and focus on the frequency.
English
0
0
1
11
keith369me
keith369me@keith369me·
The external world has gone mad. Do not take part.
English
31
32
366
4.2K
Susan
Susan@skyork57·
@keith369me It’s like a perpetual repeat. It was good for a while, but now I’m getting bored.
English
0
0
4
168
keith369me
keith369me@keith369me·
This show sucks. Walk out.
English
23
10
235
7.5K
Aladex 🎙️
Aladex 🎙️@Emperor7391·
This is a popular idea, but most of it doesn't hold up well. The "60,000x faster" claim is simply made up. It traces back to a 1980s marketing document from a company called 3M, with no scientific study behind it. Neuroscientists have repeatedly noted it has no basis in research. The broader claim is also an oversimplification. The brain doesn't process images and text through completely separate, competing systems where one "wins." It uses overlapping networks. Reading activates visual cortex too. And complex images require significant cognitive work to interpret — a chart full of data isn't "instant." What the research actually shows is more nuanced: humans are good at rapidly detecting certain visual features (edges, motion, faces) but understanding an image takes time and effort. A SpaceX launch video communicates emotion and spectacle quickly. It communicates orbital mechanics, fuel chemistry, and engineering tradeoffs far worse than a well-written explanation. The slide deck example actually cuts the other way. Decades of research on "Death by PowerPoint" shows that bullet-pointed slides routinely reduce comprehension compared to prose. Edward Tufte and others have documented this extensively. NASA's own post-Columbia investigation partly blamed slide culture for obscuring critical technical information. What's genuinely true is that visuals and text serve different cognitive purposes and work best together. Dual-coding theory (Paivio, 1971 — an actual study) suggests combining images and words improves retention more than either alone. The "we're wired for pictures not prose" framing is itself a rhetorical move — ironically, a verbal one — designed to make a particular conclusion feel biological and inevitable. That's worth noticing.
English
9
8
167
32.2K
Peter H. Diamandis, MD
Peter H. Diamandis, MD@PeterDiamandis·
The human brain processes visual information 60,000x faster than text. Humans are visual processors, not text processors. Images hit the brain instantly. Words take work. That's why a single SpaceX launch video communicates more than a thousand-word essay—and why your slide decks hit harder than paragraphs. We're wired for pictures, not prose.
English
1.2K
1.2K
11.1K
29.9M
Fit_Fusion
Fit_Fusion@FitFusion__·
This is hard
Fit_Fusion tweet media
English
222
0
29
25.6K
keith369me
keith369me@keith369me·
Exhausted today. Barely functioning. Anyone else? Usually I’m pretty solid on Mondays after a weekend of fun/rest.
English
74
4
287
5.8K
Susan
Susan@skyork57·
@EricinAmericaX @BarronTNews_ Media polls have always been skewed. A more accurate reflection of national sentiment is a sample from all regions of the US and a larger sample body. Make sure you check the data for these polls. The majority of the samples are usually urban, ignoring rural.
English
0
0
0
15
Eric Jay
Eric Jay@EricinAmericaX·
He's doing a better job at representing the majority of Americans who oppose this war. Trump never had a plan. Which is obvious to anyone who has been listening to him and his allies contradict themselves while they lie to the American people about the pretext for this war and what their motivations are moving forward. Khamenei's death is certainly a win for many, but killing him doesn't mean "regime change." Mind you, the 86 year old Ayatollah was already on death's door when we turned him into a martyr in the eyes of his most radicalized followers. Regime change isn't the primary motivation here. Trump's messaging has been inconsistent and he is nonchalantly brushing off the fact that strikes have also killed potential US backed replacements while Trump doesn't appear sympathetic at all to the Iranian people. Trump telling the Iranians to "rise up" so he can avoid having to take responsibility for what follows is NOT a strategy. The Iranian people have no power right now to mount ANY sort of resistance. Trump is telling them to march to their deaths, just like he will our troops when we eventually put boots on the ground because there's no other plausible way to facilitate structural change. The truth is, the operation in Venezuela emboldened Trump. And even though we kept the oppressive Maduro government intact in exchange for their cooperation, Trump saw it as a massive success. So this is less about regime change and more about Trump feeling empowered to use the military to whatever end he sees fit. This is more about Trump and his jingoists within the administration trying to instill fear into his global enemies. It's a vindictive and imperialist military campaign meant to show the rest of the world that the US can cut off the head of any government that opposes them. Trump clearly doesn't care about the cost(s) of war, economic or otherwise, so long as he accomplishes his goal of displaying US dominance and exposing the weaknesses of his adversaries. He doesn't care about the rising death toll, the innocent civilian casualties, the immediate and long term consequences of unbridled military force in these regions. All he seems to care about is demonstrating the might of the US military, which he no doubt sees as a reflection of his own strength. But this isn't like Venezuela. If the goal actually is regime change, it isn't going to happen over night. There's no guarantee that it WILL happen. Iran's power structure and institutions run DEEP and the Ayatollah will just be replaced by another hardline figure. This war will have rippling consequences in the region and for most of the world. E.g. power vacuums and the fights to fill them, years of tumult and violence, ongoing military incursions, proxy battles, terrorist attacks and infighting, even civil war. Also global trade disruptions, market shocks, and rising oil prices. And yes all of the taxpayer money and resources that will be consumed and who knows how many lives lost. And for what? Imaginary nuclear weapons? Have we learned nothing!? Trump and his partner in war crimes will also say that these bombings and interventions are necessary; insisting that they're "liberating" a country that they intentionally destabilized just the same. And let's be clear. Trump and his supporters couldn't care LESS about the freedoms of the Iranian people. NO, this isn't about freedom, it's about Trump's self interests, his ego and "legacy," his imperialist whims. It's about showcasing his own power through his belligerent use of the military. Trump's assassination of Soleimani; his decision to abandon the previous JCPOA out of sheer spite for Obama; his failed attempts at "negotiating" a new nuclear deal, AND his use of devastating sanctions against Iran and his reckless foreign policy over the years—all of these things are part of the same sequence of events that triggered this latest phase of the war, with a little nudge from Netanyahu of course
Eric Jay tweet mediaEric Jay tweet mediaEric Jay tweet mediaEric Jay tweet media
English
3
1
5
448
ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸
🚨 HOLY CRAP: Sen. Tim Sheehy stepped in himself and helped Capitol Police eject a protester screaming about President Trump’s Iran strikes. No patience for the circus. He handled it personally. 🔥
English
143
143
1K
83.8K
Susan
Susan@skyork57·
@keith369me Last night checked time and got 11:11.
English
0
0
1
17
keith369me
keith369me@keith369me·
2/26-2026 2:26 PM 1-1-1 New Beginnings Angel number 1 is a powerful message from the universe signaling new beginnings, independence, and the power of positive thought to manifest your desires. Peace, love, joy, abundance, truth, expansion.
English
3
9
94
1.3K
Susan
Susan@skyork57·
@keith369me No, no more odds - IT IS. Happily, I am still at the stage that it is a pleasant surprise that pops up throughout the day. One regret, the time will come that it may seem mundane.
English
0
0
1
4
keith369me
keith369me@keith369me·
What are the odds of this happening? 1 in 100 million?
keith369me tweet media
English
80
68
883
11K
keith369me
keith369me@keith369me·
So Mac the Lefty is my memory and eyes...
GIF
English
1
0
7
512
LadyValor
LadyValor@lady_valor_07·
I got only 1 point. You?
LadyValor tweet media
English
2.8K
64
734
74.4K
Susan
Susan@skyork57·
@keith369me @taylorkenneyitm Not just precious metal. A friend’s bank refuse to transfer funds from his account to purchase xrp.
English
0
0
1
9
Taylor Kenney
Taylor Kenney@taylorkenneyitm·
🚨Banks blocking the exits into gold and silver today, 1/16/26
English
768
4.3K
12.3K
843.4K
Mishi Vibes 🇺🇲
Mishi Vibes 🇺🇲@Mishi_2210_·
If answer is not 300 then what is the answer..? 1 percent will succeed
Mishi Vibes 🇺🇲 tweet media
English
33.3K
346
8.8K
6.2M