rach 🤿

494 posts

rach 🤿 banner
rach 🤿

rach 🤿

@slaychael

your thoughts Katılım Ekim 2020
127 Takip Edilen36 Takipçiler
rach 🤿
rach 🤿@slaychael·
@Timcanrun @ReuelWilliams3 I understand your point now. I do think that the comparison to human-based tragedies is a bit gauche and there are fundamental differences in the current needs and behaviors of humans vs animals to make comparison confusing. Their arguments can stand without it. Thank you
English
0
0
1
20
Tim Can Run
Tim Can Run@Timcanrun·
@slaychael @ReuelWilliams3 …The fact that an animal gets killed must be the same tragedy as a human getting killed (even if the killer isn’t “evil” because they are impaired). So morally, we should be preventing animals from killing animals, even if they don’t understand what they are doing.
English
1
0
2
25
Reuel Williams
Reuel Williams@ReuelWilliams3·
Very dumb. You think eating meat is ok because they aren’t human. Slave owners thought it was ok to torture black people because they aren’t *white*. The moral circle has then since extended beyond whiteness and it will extend beyond humanity.
Monjula Ray 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️🥥@queerBengali

Ok but a cow is categorically not a human so it’s not the same issue. 100 years from today they will not discover that a cow is a human.

English
38
66
1.3K
34.6K
rach 🤿
rach 🤿@slaychael·
@Timcanrun @ReuelWilliams3 Is that his argument? Can you point me to that (genuinely)? I assumed that his argument was predicated on the idea that humans, as morally conscious beings, have the capability/capacity to empathise with animals and thus seek food that doesn’t necessitate mass-production of meat
English
2
0
4
137
Tim Can Run
Tim Can Run@Timcanrun·
@slaychael @ReuelWilliams3 Yeah, he dodged the question. The premise of his argument is: killing animals is wrong because animals are morally equivalent to humans. I’m asking him to follow that to its logical conclusion. If animals are morally equivalent to humans, it doesn’t matter WHO does the killing
English
2
0
2
144
rach 🤿
rach 🤿@slaychael·
@Moon_River05 @KensingtonRoyal @sueziad May I ask why? Tā moko has been practiced for a thousand years. I am wondering what about it *today* makes it unsuitable or “stupid”? Particularly when she comes from a country where this is a socially and culturally acceptable tattoo?
English
0
0
0
110
Lynn Without an E
Lynn Without an E@Moon_River05·
@KensingtonRoyal @sueziad I don't care what her culture is, nor her religion nor whom she's honouring....that is the stupidest place for tattoo I've ever seen....I'm at a loss for words
English
144
0
138
36K
The Prince and Princess of Wales
A pleasure to meet with Māori Queen Te Arikinui Kuini Nga wai hono i te po today at Windsor Castle.
The Prince and Princess of Wales tweet media
English
2.3K
1.6K
26.4K
4.1M
rach 🤿
rach 🤿@slaychael·
@Timcanrun @ReuelWilliams3 (I am not vegetarian nor am I particularly interested in the vegetarian twitter wars just dropping in from the TL for the moral quandary)
English
1
0
2
154
rach 🤿
rach 🤿@slaychael·
@Timcanrun @ReuelWilliams3 He didn’t say it was ok for animals to do it, he just said it was amoral and an unfortunate reality of nature. If a disabled person was in that position where killing someone was necessary for their own survival, it wouldn’t be “okay” but it wouldn’t make the disabled person evil
English
1
0
5
166
rach 🤿
rach 🤿@slaychael·
@Red_Mage23 Everyone else’s great points and also perhaps more importantly it would be very ugly and I wouldn’t like to be named “shee” when it could be spelled in an infinitely cooler way
English
0
0
1
4K
rach 🤿
rach 🤿@slaychael·
@palmerccio @megievalist @myaurorahong I don’t think Megan is defending, the verse says “whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart." Which is basically christian framework to your point (that watching other people for sexual grat is cheating).
English
0
0
3
65
rach 🤿
rach 🤿@slaychael·
@maybe_almost_ @pinkbarbiebrush @madsdanae (These links are things I have been reading recently. They provide some context to my belief which is that the porn industry is nearly wholly exploitative of both its ‘actors’ and audiences).
English
0
0
1
75
maybe_almost
maybe_almost@maybe_almost_·
@slaychael @pinkbarbiebrush @madsdanae It’s literally the same way YouTube works. Have some oversight on your platform and ban bad actors and/or send their info to the authorities. I don’t mean to be obtuse here, but you can say the same thing about literally every video of people online.
English
2
0
3
121
rach 🤿
rach 🤿@slaychael·
@maybe_almost_ @pinkbarbiebrush @madsdanae —block buster versus the free-for-all that online pornography serves as. The question from there is how to overcome this if we can, whether it’s theough more comprehensive regulations or banning online platforms in their entirety. But that wasn’t my initial point
English
1
0
0
104
rach 🤿
rach 🤿@slaychael·
@maybe_almost_ @pinkbarbiebrush @madsdanae The difference with films imo is that there is a process for obtaining consent and the inclusion of workplace safety regulations that categorically does not exist across porn due to how it’s distributed online. I think it’s a lot less likely a trafficked girl will appear in a—
English
1
0
1
141
rach 🤿
rach 🤿@slaychael·
@maybe_almost_ @pinkbarbiebrush @madsdanae All my first point says is that the sex act is actually physically occurring. Though one of my issues with porn is that consent is always “assumed”. There’s no guarantee that what you are watching is ethically or consensually produced bar some exceptions
English
2
0
3
282
rach 🤿
rach 🤿@slaychael·
@M4YBEIMAL1VE @maybe_almost_ @pinkbarbiebrush @madsdanae Are you suggesting sex acts aren’t actually occurring in pornography? Again, there is a difference between events actually occurring but perhaps being choreographed (porn) vs something that is made to look happen but doesn’t (sfx)
English
1
0
1
162
rach 🤿
rach 🤿@slaychael·
@maybe_almost_ @pinkbarbiebrush @madsdanae I think a difference is firstly that horror movies aren’t real, and secondly feminists have repeatedly and consistently been pointing out how specific archetypes and stereotypes within the horror genre exist alongside and perpetuate societal biases (e.g, the virgin, the whore).
English
2
1
52
825
maybe_almost
maybe_almost@maybe_almost_·
@pinkbarbiebrush @madsdanae wtf is this argument? If that’s true then horror movies normalize much more disgusting things than sexual violence.
English
4
0
47
3.3K
rach 🤿 retweetledi
Noble Art Understander
Noble Art Understander@UnderstanderArt·
Dude who hates Nolan’s adaptation of Homer not because it’s inaccurate or unfaithful but because he agrees with Plato that Homer is a corruptive influence on the youth.
English
21
622
7.7K
111K
rach 🤿
rach 🤿@slaychael·
@AnaEscobarShow Just following orders md I’ve seen this play before 😭😭😭
English
0
0
2
182
Ana Escobar
Ana Escobar@AnaEscobarShow·
And to be clear none of them want to be there. They are just following orders. It’s a big reason why I hate why I hate Trump so much. Their lives are at risk , not for any just cause. For Israel.
English
364
393
10.5K
415.7K
Ana Escobar
Ana Escobar@AnaEscobarShow·
My brother is an American military pilot. He texted me FROM A DITCH IN ISRAEL because during bombing the Israelis refused to let American soldiers into the bomb shelter. Israel has betrayed us.
Ana Escobar tweet media
English
3.9K
13.6K
71.6K
4.4M