Scott Byrd

189 posts

Scott Byrd banner
Scott Byrd

Scott Byrd

@slbyrd

Christian, Husband, Father, Grandfather, Retired Navy, Software Engineer, Lover of birds

King George, Virginia Katılım Kasım 2024
129 Takip Edilen93 Takipçiler
Scott Byrd
Scott Byrd@slbyrd·
A nice evening for some history.
Scott Byrd tweet media
English
0
0
0
1
Scott Byrd
Scott Byrd@slbyrd·
@arthurbrooks I just finished reading it. Extremely readable a very insightful. I talk about elements of it with my friends al the time, especially the impact of technology on our meaning.
English
0
0
0
14
Dr. Arthur Brooks
Dr. Arthur Brooks@arthurbrooks·
My new book, The Meaning of Your Life, has debuted as a #1 NYT Best-seller! I want to thank you for your support and for helping bring these ideas to others! I appreciate you.
English
15
13
139
15.3K
Scott Byrd
Scott Byrd@slbyrd·
@thdxr I find it even better to let others get the praise that comes with success while I absorb the blame when things go wrong.
English
0
0
1
327
dax
dax@thdxr·
the thing with being a leader is you get to take credit for your team's work so when things go wrong it's only fair that you pass the blame onto them
English
38
19
1.3K
49.8K
Scott Byrd retweetledi
Franklin Graham
Franklin Graham@Franklin_Graham·
“He is not here; for He is risen, as He said.” (Matthew 28:6)
English
208
1.4K
12.8K
93.8K
Scott Byrd
Scott Byrd@slbyrd·
@HogsHaven I would love to see them draft Love, not trade down.
English
1
0
4
153
Salesforce Ben
Salesforce Ben@SalesforceBen·
Salesforce has been named one of the World’s Most Ethical Companies again. But as questions around culture and leadership grow, the timing feels notable. Henry Martin and Tom Morgan look at the award criteria and why the reaction is more mixed this time. bit.ly/4bJjN0r
English
1
0
0
205
Scott Byrd
Scott Byrd@slbyrd·
@GuntherEagleman Boy, when they come up with a new talking point, they really can't let it go.
English
0
0
1
21
Scott Byrd
Scott Byrd@slbyrd·
How about my SS contributions and those from my employer all go to my 401(k)?
English
0
0
1
30
Scott Byrd
Scott Byrd@slbyrd·
@GuntherEagleman This is kind of like asking a kid if they’d rather go to the dentist or go get ice cream
English
1
1
4
43
Scott Byrd
Scott Byrd@slbyrd·
@RapidResponse47 Not sure we are seeing this here in VA. Feel like gas stations are gaming us. Saw the price per gallon go up $0.48 yesterday for regular.
English
0
0
1
30
Rapid Response 47
Rapid Response 47@RapidResponse47·
Progress made — with a lot more to come!
Rapid Response 47 tweet media
English
118
280
1.3K
70.3K
Scott Byrd retweetledi
James Hickman
James Hickman@thesovereignman·
PepsiCo spent $2.8 million last year lobbying to keep junk food eligible for food stamps. Then RFK got 18 states to ban SNAP purchases of soda, candy, and processed snacks. Within a week, PepsiCo cut Doritos, Lay's, and Tostitos prices by up to 15%. The CEO blamed "affordability." But the timing tells the real story. SNAP is a $100 billion-a-year program. According to the USDA, 20 cents of every SNAP dollar goes to junk food. Frito-Lay products appeared in 7.2% of all SNAP shopping trips. The moment the government stopped subsidizing demand, PepsiCo had to compete on price. No regulation. No price caps. No antitrust probe. The subsidy disappeared, and the market corrected overnight. Now consider that this same pattern — government money in, prices up — plays out in college tuition, healthcare, defense, and every other industry with a guaranteed government buyer. Pepsi was one company, one product line, one program. Imagine what happens when the subsidies stop across the board. schiffsovereign.com/trends/when-go…
English
419
5.1K
18.1K
624.9K
Scott Byrd
Scott Byrd@slbyrd·
@cjt5prkgvv @HarmeetKDhillon @VerizonSupport @Apple I’ve just given up calling them. It’s absolutely infuriating. Total waste of time. We’ve been waiting for a fill up for almost 2 weeks. We’ve had to stop cooking on our stove, minimize our use of hot water, and reconfigure our HVAC system to run without the furnace.
English
1
0
1
3
Marianne
Marianne@cjt5prkgvv·
@HarmeetKDhillon @VerizonSupport @Apple Try calling @Amerigas…they out sourced all their customer service to India during last Admin! After years of disliking them, I will be switching to a local service they possibly haven’t bought up.😡
English
1
0
0
29
Harmeet K. Dhillon
Harmeet K. Dhillon@HarmeetKDhillon·
I’m at 3.5 hours on the phone and my fourth customer service rep with @VerizonSupport on the simple task of connecting a new @Apple watch to my account. Shockingly bad and incompetent service. Ruining my day!
English
2.4K
1.5K
13.4K
274.2K
Scott Byrd
Scott Byrd@slbyrd·
This may not be popular, but I do not believe deadly force was needed in the case of the Renee Good incident. I don't debate that her behavior leading up to that event was unlawful, but shooting her was an escalation that was likely not the best choice.
English
0
0
0
20
Scott Byrd
Scott Byrd@slbyrd·
@JPFinlayNBCS 💯 I would root for the devil first, but since that isn't go to happen either, Go Jags!
English
0
0
0
25
JP Finlay
JP Finlay@JPFinlayNBCS·
Not sure I’m really rooting for anybody but it definitely isn’t the Eagles
JP Finlay tweet media
English
129
38
1.6K
70.6K
Scott Byrd retweetledi
Cynical Publius
Cynical Publius@CynicalPublius·
I have been monitoring the Venezuela issue all day long, and there are so many questions yet to be answered (thanks to great Pentagon OPSEC), but the strategic reason for bringing down Maduro has become abundantly clear. While we ostensibly captured Maduro based on legitimate, outstanding US drug charges from 2020, the real reason for the military operations early this morning is that neutralizing Maduro's Venezuela had become a strategic imperative for the USA. Under Maduro, Venezuela had become the Latin American crossroads for all of the USA's principal enemies. Maduro was nurturing relationships with Russia, Hezbollah and Iran. Worst of all, Venezuela was eagerly becoming a part of Red China's Belt & Road initiative. As America's enemies were lining up Venezuela as their base of operations in the Western Hemisphere to cause mischief and destruction for the USA, Maduro was at the same time making Venezuela a crossroads, safe haven and enabler for all manner of narcoterrorist operations, ranging from Colombia's FARC to Mexico's Sinaloa cartel. On top of all that, Venezuela had become a key player in the illegal alien invasion of the USA, shipping its very worst to the USA in a deliberate and comprehensive destabilizing operation that might have worked had Donald Trump not won in 2024. Next in importance: oil. The global and regional ambitions of both China and Russia are in large part dependent on the politics of petroleum, and the USA just deprived both of the cudgel afforded by friendly Venezuelan oil. Trump opponents say "It's about oil" as if that was a bad thing. Yeah, it's about oil. Finally, all of this was in keeping with the most essential and fundamental foreign policy mandate of the USA almost since the nation's inception: the Monroe Doctrine. Operations like what Maduro was running simply cannot be allowed in the Western Hemisphere. Trump was right for falling back on this most basic of doctrines that protects the USA's sovereignty. So was Maduro seized because of some five year-old drug charges? Yes. Legally--yes. However, like so many strategic issues in the world today, an action needed to be backed by the fine points of law, and it was. But the reality is that the Maduro takedown was a Monroe Doctrine-driven necessity that has greatly enhanced the power and national security of the USA. Congratulations, Donald Trump, Marco Rubio, Pete Hegseth and the rest of the Trump national security team: you boldly took the steps necessary to defend the USA. Well done.
English
1.8K
11.4K
43K
1.1M
Scott Byrd
Scott Byrd@slbyrd·
Yesterday was a great victory for those who cherish freedom. I am so happy that we can provide a chance for this freedom to the people of Venezuela. God is good.
English
0
0
0
10
JP Finlay
JP Finlay@JPFinlayNBCS·
How does the ref blow dead a backwards pass? And then they say it went out of bounds? That’s outrageous
English
15
8
102
24.2K