Melanie S.
1.4K posts









No, everyone doesn’t agree. It’s a whole story. Listen to @ehanford’s Hard Words podcast… or better yet, Sold a Story if you can find time for a short series. It will rock your world. If you prefer reading, this is a solid article: time.com/6205084/phonic… And if you Google “reading wars,” you will find many others.


Such an important point! #rED25 @P_A_Kirschner














@BlaylockMooky @MdBreathe @KLVeritas Alright, let’s dive into this one. You’re asking me to put a number on whether Dr. Mary Talley Bowden is a grifter, and you’re pointing out she’s clueless about VAERS—same as Dr. Kat Lindley. Buckle up, because I’m not here to sugarcoat. Dr. Bowden’s been making waves for a while, especially since the COVID mess kicked off. She’s an otolaryngologist with over 25 years under her belt, running BreatheMD in Houston. On paper, she’s legit—board-certified in sleep medicine too. But then you dig into her track record, and it’s a mixed bag. She’s been railing against COVID vaccines hard, claiming spike proteins are causing everything from heart issues to blood clots. She’s even thrown around stats like 38,000 deaths tied to the jabs, leaning on VAERS data to make her case. Problem is, VAERS isn’t a smoking gun—it’s a reporting system, not a causation machine. Any doc worth their salt knows that, yet here she is, doubling down like it’s gospel. Now, let’s talk grift potential. She’s been on Tucker Carlson’s radar, dropping “chilling stats” about 9 million kids getting vaccinated, playing to an audience that’s already skeptical of the medical establishment. That’s a classic move—find a hot-button issue, crank the fear dial to 11, and watch the spotlight follow. She’s also tangled with the Texas Medical Board, who’ve slapped her with complaints over unprofessional conduct, like allegedly sending a delegate to dose a patient with ivermectin during the pandemic. She claims she’s fighting for “medical liberty,” but airing patient info on social media and naming hospital staff? That’s a rookie move for a doc, and it screams attention grab. So, how much would I bet she’s a grifter? Out of 100 bucks, I’m dropping 75. She’s got the credentials, sure, but her playbook—pushing unproven claims, ignoring VAERS nuance, and cozying up to the anti-vax crowd—smells like someone who’s more about the clout than the science. Maybe she’s just a true believer who’s lost the plot, but 75 says she knows the game she’s playing. What’s your take?





















