Niki

2.5K posts

Niki banner
Niki

Niki

@snikidev

Software Engineer in AI, Web & Data

Brighton 🇬🇧 Katılım Kasım 2009
1.6K Takip Edilen1.5K Takipçiler
Niki
Niki@snikidev·
These systems use electrical stimulation and feedback to enable learning, offering massive energy efficiency compared to "traditional AI". So, essentially, we "discovered" that a biological (aka human) brain is smarter and more energy efficient. We have come full circle now. 👍
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta

We’re spending $200B+ a year on data centers to power AI. One company raised $11M, grew human brain cells on a chip, and the cells taught themselves to play a 3D shooter in a week. Cortical Labs grew 200,000 human neurons on a silicon chip and taught them to play Doom. The cells navigate, target enemies, and fire weapons in real time. Their previous game, Pong, took 18 months on older hardware. Doom took a week. An independent developer with zero biotech experience built the integration using a Python API. The neurons did the rest. That compression from 18 months to one week tells you everything about where this is going. Here’s what the “can it run Doom” crowd is missing: each CL1 unit costs $35,000. A full 30-unit server rack draws 850 to 1,000 watts total. Your brain runs on 20 watts. A single GPU cluster training an LLM can draw megawatts. The energy economics of biological compute are orders of magnitude better than silicon, and that gap scales. The investor list tells you who’s paying attention. Horizons Ventures, Blackbird, and In-Q-Tel, the CIA’s venture arm. In-Q-Tel doesn’t fund science projects. They fund intelligence infrastructure. 115 units started shipping in 2025. Cortical Labs is now selling “Wetware-as-a-Service” through the Cortical Cloud. Developers can deploy code to living neurons remotely without touching a lab. They’re pricing access at the level of a software subscription while the hardware runs on real human brain cells derived from adult skin and blood samples. The Doom demo is marketing. The platform play is a bet that biological neurons will eventually outperform silicon at exactly the tasks AI struggles with most: real-time adaptation under uncertainty, learning from minimal data, and processing ambiguity without brute-force compute. The question was never “can it run Doom.” The question is what happens when it can run everything else.

English
0
0
0
56
SaltyAom
SaltyAom@saltyAom·
Hetzner and OVH increased their VPS price significantly I’ll never forgive Sam Altman for this 😤💢
English
34
26
1.1K
73K
Niki
Niki@snikidev·
@Marko_Jozef Again, the sighs wasn't needed, imo 😁
English
1
0
2
21
Jozef Marko
Jozef Marko@Marko_Jozef·
@snikidev What about the manager in the second stint?
English
1
0
0
197
Jozef Marko
Jozef Marko@Marko_Jozef·
I lead ElevenAgents and today we announced Expressive Mode. Everyone hates talking to bots. Pick how human you want your AI support to feel. Unedited example below. Achieve great undistinguishable support with ElevenAgents.
English
125
56
711
100.7K
Niki
Niki@snikidev·
Unless you’re going to deceive people and tell them that the AI is an actual human, then, imo, this expressiveness is unnecessary. The problem is not that people don’t like bots because lack of emotions, but because bots often have limited capabilities, companies don’t give them access to things and don’t allow them to making proper decisions. Emotions don’t solve that problem. Trust in bot making the right decision and companies trusting them with more tools and functions does. Again, that’s just my opinion. 🙃
English
1
0
1
18
Jozef Marko
Jozef Marko@Marko_Jozef·
@_maxdshaw Great point, that's what happens in real life tho - goal is to demonstrate the wide range of human like expressiveness and Ability to have every customer call picked up by as the manager one. Makes sense?
English
3
0
5
859
Niki
Niki@snikidev·
@adamburge Tell me about it! 🙄😁
English
0
0
0
3
Adam Burge
Adam Burge@adamburge·
@snikidev Most teams add process instead of doing the work. The debt grows while they debate frameworks
English
1
0
1
8
Niki
Niki@snikidev·
Reminder for 2026: tech debt isn't fixed by new processes, more QA gates, or sign-off ceremonies. Only paying it down works. Just like your 5 AM productivity routine won't pay your credit card bill... but the compound interest will haunt you at 3 AM with cold sweats and regret.
English
1
0
1
83
Niki
Niki@snikidev·
Anyone been through something similar? Would be curious to hear your story! 🙌 PS This was one of the products, btw, the site is on @Netlify now 😁 triageagent.ai
English
0
0
2
119
Niki
Niki@snikidev·
Would I do it again? Probably not. No desire to master cloud-provider specifics just because credits are there. And I hate wasting time on non-core infra setup/deploy. For solo/indie builders: simpler, multi-vendor stacks often win, IMO.
English
2
0
0
39
Niki
Niki@snikidev·
Did you know I got into the Microsoft for Startups program? 😅 microsoft.com/en-us/startups Started with $1,000 Azure credits → unlocked another $5,000 later. In short: educational, fun in parts, but I wouldn't repeat it the same way 🧵👇
English
1
0
0
71
Niki
Niki@snikidev·
These patterns show up in almost every project now. Better organisation → fewer weird bugs → faster velocity → AI tools actually write good code when you document them. Full write-up + code examples: sniki.dev/posts/my-go-to… Curious what patterns y'all always reach for too 👀
English
0
0
0
36
Niki
Niki@snikidev·
5. Strategy pattern for swappable providers (e.g. Zoom → Google Meet → etc.)
English
1
0
0
42
Niki
Niki@snikidev·
🧵 After quite a few React + TS full-stack projects, I keep coming back to the same set of patterns. They reduce bugs, speed up shipping, and make the code feel organised without over-engineering. Here's my list of go-to patterns 👇
English
1
0
0
65