esok🌥️

baru sadar, orang yang beneran sayang itu yang notice sama hal-hal kecil. kayak tau kalo kita ga suka es teh manis, atau inget kita alergi sama beberapa makanan. selain itu cuma orang yang lagi gabut suka doang

pembicaraan orang dewasa senin pagi:

Your tattoo isn’t just decorative ink: it’s a permanent trigger that keeps your immune system locked in a lifelong cycle of chronic inflammation. As soon as the ink is injected into your skin, your body recognizes the pigment particles as foreign invaders. Immune cells called macrophages immediately swarm the area and attempt to swallow them up. But because they can’t actually break down the ink, the macrophages eventually die, releasing the pigment back into the surrounding tissue — only for a new wave of macrophages to arrive and repeat the process. This endless cycle is what keeps the tattoo permanently visible, while also maintaining a state of ongoing, low-level inflammation in the skin. Over time, some of these ink particles migrate through the lymphatic system and accumulate in the lymph nodes, placing constant stress on the body’s defense mechanisms. Emerging research suggests this internal ink buildup may interfere with normal immune function, potentially reducing the effectiveness of certain vaccines, including mRNA types. Additionally, many tattoo inks contain heavy metals like nickel and cobalt. Combined with the chronic inflammation, this has been linked to a modestly elevated risk of lymphoma and skin cancer. While tattoos remain a powerful form of self-expression, they represent a complex, decades-long biological conflict between your immune system and foreign substances embedded in your skin. [Nielsen, C., Jerkeman, M., & Jöud, A. S. (2024). Tattoos as a risk factor for systemic lymphoma: A population-based case-control study. eClinicalMedicine]

Tahun depan bisa gini ga yaa

kelebihan: fast learner kekurangan: pelupa

This article should be mandatory reading for every medical student, PhD candidate, researcher—and honestly, for anyone who mistakes expertise for certainty. “The importance of stupidity in scientific research” sounds provocative, almost offensive. But Martin Schwartz is not glorifying incompetence. He is describing the real operating system of discovery. Science is not built on knowing. Science is built on tolerating not knowing. That distinction matters. Most of education rewards correctness. School teaches us to answer. Exams reward speed, certainty, and precision. You feel intelligent when you get things right. Research is the opposite. Real research begins exactly where competence ends—at the frontier where nobody knows the answer, including the people you thought must know. That moment is psychologically brutal. You ask the expert. The expert shrugs. You assume you’re missing something. Then you realize: no—this is the work. You are not failing. You are standing at the actual boundary of knowledge. That feeling—“I must be stupid”—is often not a sign of inadequacy. It is often the first sign that you are finally asking an important question. Medicine struggles with this. We train doctors to avoid uncertainty, to fear being wrong, to perform confidence. But the best clinicians and the best scientists know how to sit inside ambiguity without collapsing into fake certainty. This is why AI in medicine also deserves caution. Systems trained only to reproduce established answers may become extraordinarily good at passing exams while being terrible at discovering what matters next. Guideline intelligence is not the same as scientific intelligence. Discovery requires productive stupidity: the willingness to stay with the uncomfortable, to look ignorant, to ask naïve questions, to be wrong repeatedly without protecting your ego. Most people want the authority of expertise. Very few want the humiliation required to earn it. But progress lives there. Not in certainty. Not in performance. Not in sounding smart. In the quiet discipline of saying: “I don’t know… yet.” And continuing anyway.

gimana cara kamu tau lawan biacaramu wawasannya luas pas lagi ngobrol?

Your partner's cognitive function may contagiously influence yours over the years.

Mari normalisasikan untuk mengutamakan fungsi, bukan gengsi: • Pakai pakaian yg itu2 aja gapapa • Gak beli barang branded pun gapapa, selama masih layak dipakai • Makan di warteg, warung kaki lima, atau bahkan masak sendiri pun gapapa • Naik motor, naik angkot, atau transum gapapa • Pakai HP yg udah 2–3 tahun pun gapapa, selama masih lancar buat komunikasi dan kerja • Liburan ke tempat deket/staycation di rumah gapapa, yg penting bisa quality time Belajar jg untuk jadi orang yg gak penting, orang lain gak sepeduli itu sama kita

I could really use some words of encouragement right now. If you have any, feel free to drop them through a QRT, whether it’s quotes or anything else, totally up to you.