sonch

186.1K posts

sonch banner
sonch

sonch

@soncharm

One of the main ones on here. Williamson voter. Twitter account haver. UN Special Rapporteur on Smart People. Just a character I’m workshopping don’t worry

Katılım Mayıs 2009
6.3K Takip Edilen6.5K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
sonch
sonch@soncharm·
Still strikes me as pretty weird that the US government using public resources funded ridiculously ill-justified virus-breeding research that created a pandemic killing millions and counting, and no one’s in trouble for it and no one cares, but maybe that’s just me.
English
49
230
1.1K
0
sonch
sonch@soncharm·
There is a very simple explanation here. Ds made Franken resign cuz he became a liability to the ‘me too’ campaign which they wanted, ultimately, to direct against Donald Trump. (It had nothing to do with any coherent principled evaluation of what Franken actually did.) There’s no such political-op underway that somehow requires tossing NYC’s mayor’s wife under the bus. So you see, there’s no contradiction.
Brianna Wu@BriannaWu

We made Al Franken resign over a joke, but this woman can cheerlead the rape, slaughter, and torture of Jewish civilians and no one in my party gives a fuck.

English
1
1
32
1K
sonch
sonch@soncharm·
wait just remembered he also did Inherent Vice, another Pynchon adapation. which was much more amusing! i could watch that Joaquin character walking around for another 4 hours. maybe i just don't like Leo
English
0
0
0
81
sonch
sonch@soncharm·
Finished OBAA. Some good aspects, but geez overall what a lightweight movie. That Best-Picture award has gotta be a makeup-prize for his other movies (mostly There Will Be Blood, I guess). Like when they gave it to Scorsese for The Departed Licorice Pizza was so much better
sonch@soncharm

Risked breaking my no-Oscar-winner streak already & started to watch One Battle After Another. It’s pretty boring! What am I missing. Does it get better? Who can care about any of these stupid people idgi

English
3
0
6
513
sonch
sonch@soncharm·
p.s. in a sense, complaining about this whole Smart People/junior-HS clique dynamic is basically my whole online thing fyi, & has been for years. so if this kinda tweet annoys you, may as well unff now
English
0
0
2
68
sonch
sonch@soncharm·
I genuinely mean this btw not just snark. There’s a reason some judge considers a Robert Malone ripe for second-guessing on vaccines yet that same judge would not have considered [Rando Dumbass Bureaucrat w/MPH] ripe for second-guessing on, say, mask mandates. That reason can’t possibly be found in ‘the law’. It’s prior to that. It’s ‘cultural’. The cultural-cohort of (most of) the type of people who might become judges (or, Atlantic writers…same thing?) looks kindly on ‘Public Health Expert’ bureaucrats, but looks askance at all things related to RFK, and ‘anti-vaxxers’. That’s just true. That’s just a sociocultural fact about them. This isn’t traceable to something written in ‘the law’. How could it be? No, it’s just about which clique likes which type of people. Just like in junior high. If you’re in that clique, you and ‘everyone you know’ hates RFK, you find him icky. You just do. You’re suspicious of everything he does & think he ‘needs to be held in check’. You just do. This is something you ‘know’, without and prior to any case being brought. Therefore, if you’re such a person, and hold a judgeship, and someone brings a suit to stay an RFK thing, you *look for reasons to grant it*. Of course you do. Because you ‘know’ that’s needed, for ‘good governance’. Of course you do. Everyone you know agrees. Everything you read reinforces that. Read the article! Meanwhile, if it’s 2021 and lawsuit is brought against the Mask Mandate Edict written by [Local Midwit Public Health Poobah], you look for reasons to throw it out. Of course you do. So: The people who brought it, they’re probably icky right wingers anyway. Do they even have ‘standing’? Who am I as a judge to question the Expertise of this random moron with ‘Public Health’ in her job-title? Etc. That’s not a description of an objective legal or judicial dynamic, just a sociocultural one, and pretty obviously so.
sonch@soncharm

Indeed. And ‘norms’ and ‘good governance’ are based entirely on what all Smart People ‘know’ & have memed-up amongst themselves. This is actually *prior to* questions of legality. It’s pre-judicial. Pre-constitutional. All Smart People ‘know’ that any liquid called ‘a vaccine’ is good & must be injected into as many people as possible. Therefore, any process that inhibits this is automatically suspect, ‘against norms’, not ‘good governance’.

English
2
0
6
280
sonch
sonch@soncharm·
guys i’m having a hard time getting excited & celebrating with every N+1st Iranian guy I’ve never heard of who, I’m told, was a government guy in some capacity, getting killed with a missile. just not feeling it. am i a bad American
English
0
0
1
102
sonch
sonch@soncharm·
yeah but it’s more like what if a stoner ex radical had to be Liam Neeson in Taken (Big Lebowski was What if a stoner ex radical had to be Philip Marlowe) it was also derivative in other ways…‘bad guy is after a girl who is secretly his own daughter b/c her existence proves he did a bad thing & threatens his status’ was the plot of Zero Effect I guess i can forgive it for being ‘pynchonian’ and also, given its structure, doing fairy tale tropes (huntsman has moment of conscience & can’t kill Snow White) It did have some amusing parts, and of course was directed well (the score was annoying), good car chase set piece in the final sequence sure, but overall just very meh
English
1
0
0
31
Soniman
Soniman@sonimantennis·
@soncharm The premise was "what If the Dude was really Bill Ayers" and then it's got a few moments
English
1
1
2
22
sonch
sonch@soncharm·
Indeed. And ‘norms’ and ‘good governance’ are based entirely on what all Smart People ‘know’ & have memed-up amongst themselves. This is actually *prior to* questions of legality. It’s pre-judicial. Pre-constitutional. All Smart People ‘know’ that any liquid called ‘a vaccine’ is good & must be injected into as many people as possible. Therefore, any process that inhibits this is automatically suspect, ‘against norms’, not ‘good governance’.
Jonathan Cohn@CitizenCohn

"In a democracy, you don’t just get to do what you want—you have to operate within both the law and norms of good governance" @doritmi on why a federal judge is blocking some of RFK Jr.'s biggest vaccine changes thebulwark.com/p/somebody-fin…

English
0
1
14
663
sonch
sonch@soncharm·
When are prestige-directors gonna finally get their hands on the Robert Cormier corpus and do them justice
English
1
0
11
123
sonch
sonch@soncharm·
@cremieuxrecueil Absorbing to the point of incorporating-as-belief what The authority tells you is one of the core competencies being and remaining in academics selects for
English
0
0
2
81
Crémieux
Crémieux@cremieuxrecueil·
I am often shocked by how many seemingly rational academics believe strange, false assertions if they come from places of perceived authority. I don't know many of those people who would actually suggest just believing any odd thing they say just because of their authority.
English
53
39
671
24.6K
sonch
sonch@soncharm·
Team D just loves Our Precious Democracy so much they have no choice but to turn every power shift into politically-weaponized legal threats, thus replicating the conditions of the late Roman republic leading up to Caesar
AF Post@AFpost

Democratic Illinois Governor JB Pritzker speaks about a Democratic "Project 2029" in which members of the current Trump administration, along with federal agents, will be criminally and civilly prosecuted. "Whatever it is that we can do. It may be that you cannot criminally prosecute somebody, but you can go after them civilly." Follow: @AFpost

English
0
2
16
276
sonch
sonch@soncharm·
@benryanwriter whenever I’m at the used bookstore with a $1 shelf of these, very real danger I walk away with 5-10 I just pick on a whim
English
0
0
4
56